Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylongcaulking
If an unborn person is not a person prior to birth then you are absolutely correct. If on the other hand, the unborn person is a person, then it's not as cut and dry as "her body, her choice." Determining which case is true is fundamentally critical to the pro-life vs. pro-choice debate. If a fetus is nothing more than a parasitic conglomeration of tissue, then a woman's liberty to choose what to do with her body MUST be guaranteed. If on the other hand, a person becomes a person prior to birth, that person has the same fundamental right to life that the rest of us who have had the good fortune of being born have. I guess, not knowing the motivation of the OP concerning why she asked the question leaves us all a little too uninformed to properly answer her question.
|
wtf, why is this turning into an abortion debate? I'm as pro-life as they come (abortion makes baby Jesus cry, folks). But the mother having sex at any point during the pregnancy does not hurt the baby (unless you're talking about after the water breaks, hehe). Doctors even recommend this for mothers who are running past their due date.
To OP: if you want to provide during your pregnancy, you should do it. Just be careful and screen, screen, screen.
There are some who have their own hangups and won't see you - there are others that won't care and will, and still others who are into it and will see you because you are pregnant. WALDT - every guy is different.