Post a bad review? or not

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by exoticentyce

I think an honest review would better serve the needs of the community . I can see why one would abstain from writing a negative review with the fear that he may be prohibited from seeing some ladies in the future, but I dont think all ladies will black ball you for giving some other chic a no. Clearly ANYTHING could have happened in there resulting in her NO so it would be out of place for me to think its your fault or that I would get a no as well. If i provide A1 service, I shouldn't get a no.


I think it would help tremendously if providers could see the ROS, but were NOT allowed to comment on it. I personally would LOVE to see what's being said about me in the paid access only portion so I would know how I can improve, why my phone may not be ringing and what I can do to make it better the next time. Saying YES, then talking smack in the ROS is a cowardly thing to do. I know some guys take the ROS as their opportunity to give hints about what they didn't like, but how does that help the provider become better??

Might I recommend an SL clinic? Be sure and watch the next time he is in town. It’s a complete and thorough full hour of constructive criticism that enamels you to strategically pin point those areas that might need some attention. The SL staff has been known to take as much as 3-5 one hour sessions to objectively research and evaluate to make sure success is in your future. They also give a 100% money back guarantee. If you correctly follow the wise advice and instructions we guarantee you be getting all yes reviews! Watch for their specials. Rates are normally $300.00 per hour. I believe they have a special right now in Austin that even includes a photo shoot. Don't take chances on low end evaluation firms that just give lip service and have no track record. Choose SL clinics where there motto is, "When we say YES, we mean HELL YES!"

[Milehigh65]

I think bad reviews should only be posted for the following reasons. Not because you and the provider had bad chemistry. This is on reason I avoid providers with high rates as if there is no connection I've have yet to see a provider give any amount of money back (well except 1 actually refunded 50%). That is rare.

1) Bad attitude
2)bad Hygien
3) Bait & switch
4) Upselling
5) Advertise as GFE but has a list of restrictions
6) Answers her phone in the heat of things (happen to me) Lol!
7) clock watcher

[burkalini]

Originally Posted by Milehigh65

I think bad reviews should only be posted for the following reasons. Not because you and the provider had bad chemistry. This is on reason I avoid providers with high rates as if there is no connection I've have yet to see a provider give any amount of money back (well except 1 actually refunded 50%). That is rare.

1) Bad attitude
2)bad Hygien
3) Bait & switch
4) Upselling
5) Advertise as GFE but has a list of restrictions
6) Answers her phone in the heat of things (happen to me) Lol!
7) clock watcher

Good list and I agree,. The only other one I have a hard time with is dead fish. I haven't given a bad review on this yet but those sessions still stick with me. You know the type. They just lay back and open their legs. They say nothing. You get off and they immediately get up and go the bathroom. I know it's kinda like not meshing but I just have a feeling that they hate the hobby and just want to get it over with no matter who they are with. What do you guys think?

[daratu1]

@burk: I would imagine dead fish to stick with you. If it ever happened to me, I'd be having a chat with the provider as well as posting it in the ROS.

I personally write no reviews for the following reasons:
1. Bad behavior (answering calls in the heat of things, etc)
2. Bait and Switch


I have a conditional modifier of no screening. Where I hobby most of the time LE there is focused on the hobby and not screening is a red flag. I've only seen two ladies that didn't screen and both got a no. Granted one talked to literally 2 other clients on the phone during the session. The other could be argued I was too harsh on and should have gotten a yes.

I don't feel a no review should be given based of YMMV experiences. I always give the lady the benefit and assume I am at fault should I get a luke-warm session. Usually I go back again just to see if the session improves. If it does, I chalk it up to nerves. If it doesn't, and this has yet to happen, I move on.

[Milehigh65]

Originally Posted by burkalini

Good list and I agree,. The only other one I have a hard time with is dead fish. I haven't given a bad review on this yet but those sessions still stick with me. You know the type. They just lay back and open their legs. They say nothing. You get off and they immediately get up and go the bathroom. I know it's kinda like not meshing but I just have a feeling that they hate the hobby and just want to get it over with no matter who they are with. What do you guys think?

Agree; for me "Dead fish = Attitude

[awl4knot]

Originally Posted by Syncial

If you are worried about negative feedback, then maybe you should stop writing reviews. Eventually you are gonna get negative feedback for writing dishonest\sugarcoated reviews. The hobby is YMMV, so each person experience is different, but noticeable physical features are harder to sugarcoat.

I was certain that I would catch flak from the "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead" crowd by writing that there are negative consequences to negative ads, but I am a big boy and can take the heat.

Who says I write "dishonest/sugarcoated" reviews? The "truth" is that I haven't had even a so-so experience in the last three years. I do my homework, only see well-reviewed ladies, act like a gentleman and my reward has been a series of wonderful experiences, which I am happy to write about in a truthful and favorable manner. So none of my reviews are either "dishonest" or "sugarcoated." You must be thinking about someone else.

I agree that YMMV is a big factor, and for that reason, I omit some details that may not apply to others. It also means that if I have a middling experience, I would probably not report it. However, if I had a genuinely bad experience, I would report it, and hope that my good board reputation would protect me and the review from attacks.

Yet none of this takes away from my central point: If you post negative reviews there may be consequences and you should factor that into your decision making process.

[awl4knot]

Originally Posted by burkalini

Good list and I agree,. The only other one I have a hard time with is dead fish. I haven't given a bad review on this yet but those sessions still stick with me. You know the type. They just lay back and open their legs. They say nothing. You get off and they immediately get up and go the bathroom. I know it's kinda like not meshing but I just have a feeling that they hate the hobby and just want to get it over with no matter who they are with. What do you guys think?

Luckily, I don't know the type but your description is detailed enough for me to get the picture.

This type of session seems worthy of a negative review, but how do you couch it? Do you say she was: "like a dead fish. She just laid there, opened her legs and didn't respond either physically or vocally to my efforts?" Or do you say things like, "We just didn't seem to connect" or " "there was a very low energy level" or "she was very, very, very quiet" or "she didn't display lot of personality although I am sure she has one?"

Remember, even dead fish had a mother at one time.

[Soonerman12]

The only bad reviews that I've seen which seem to really stop business are ones which involve the guys being in danger, their privacy compromised, or being scammed out of money. The other ones just seem to hurt business temporarily for the provider and result in her and her friends getting angry at the bad reviewer.

[Still Looking]

Don't make me bring up the burnt rubber thing again! LOL It’s challenging when a provider gets a NO recommendation, then I turn around and post a YES singing the providers praises. Hobbyist really need to properly evaluate the review and the reviewer. I've been at times labeled as a hobbyist that gives YES recommendations. Its a lot easier for me to give YES recommendations since I am not a GFE hobbyist! Most of my reviews are the same. Suck, Suck, Suck, Bang, Bang, Bang, Big smile and whistling walking to my car! I NEVER talk about a GFE experience, because there isn't one to be had. My expectations are obviously not nearly as high as other hobbyists! The most popular question other hobbyist PM me about, is wether the provider is a good kisser? I tell them I wouldn't know! That’s a big deal for some guys as part of their hobby experience.