Quote:
Originally Posted by surfindick
Everyone chill...BBL the ladies got very tired of you (and others it not all just about you) asking about BB service in PM's and generally being a pain about it, yes chat moves very quickly and the chat MODs do and will continue to make decisions on the fly before it get's out of control. We will continue to run a very open chat and do everything in our power to keep the drama to a minimum. If someone is booted from chat they can come back very quickly.
|
surfin, I would like to see these PM chat log of the conversations that I had with girls requesting BBFS. Since I am supposedly the author of these private chats, I should be allowed to see them. Please share them with me.
Are you saying that I requested BBFS from ladies because you or some other mod SAW logs or because ladies complained that I asked for BBFS?
There are many ladies that want me gone simply because of my handle.
If ladies have made accusations about me, then we need to
check into it and punish me OR punish them for making false accusations. Let's go to the day in question that I was kicked out of chat. I did not have any private chats with anyone that day except GDLMAN.
Go back to previous days and you will see that ladies have made requests of me for BBFS with offers and rates.
The chat rule says "requests or inquiries for bareback full service BBFS are not ok". It is not gender specific. NEITHER sexes may inquire about BBFS as in a provider may not ask me "Would you like BBFS?"
For he who was wondering why I posted the chat log, it was to make full disclosure of the chat events, of what I said in public, for all to see, after the fact. If people on the forum here were to see some of the chat logs, they would really be disappointed in some of the members here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba3452
Mods do NOT make the rules. We apply and interpet them as needed but the owners make the rules, not us. Sometimes, we have to make a choice on the fly. If we are wrong, we will fix the problem. if you dont like what a mod does, your best 1st action would be to respectfully discuss it in PMwith the mod instead of blasting the forums that you were kicked out of chat. That applies to all the forums not just chat. Do you really think attacking the person who kicked you out or pointed you is the best way to change thier mnd?
|
Bubba, actually you did make a rule by warning me for revealing ROS/Private info on my Phucktoi review. I decided to put the activities ALL in the Activities section rather than Rest of Story. But you decided that I should have posted everything in ROS and moved the entire block of my "Activities" Section to the "Rest of Story" section.
You interpreted a clear rule: "Revealing Premium Content to Non-Premium Members" to mean that the author of a review MUST put specific content in ROS and may not decide what he wants made public and what he does not. I have PMd St. Chris to inform him that you are indeed MAKING policy here and scaring people off from writing reviews because they may post too much info in Activities and not enough in Rest of Story. What you did not realize was that 4 hours earlier surfindick accepted my review and as with all reviews notes:
Quote:
|
I have reviewed it and found that it meets the criteria for approval.
|
So you have one mod that says the review meets the guidelines and one mod that says there is a big enough problem with it to point the author.
The policy reads:
Quote:
|
#20 - The men and women of our board each have their respective private areas in which secure content is posted and a greater freedom of expression allowed. Each member is responsible for keeping the information in any of the private secure areas (Men's Lounge, Provider Powder Room, The Rest of the Story, posts which have been tagged as private) 100% restricted to the members who are intended to have access to that material. Revealing ANY content which was posted in one of the men's or women's private sections of the board will result in penalty, up to and including loss of your access to these areas. Full cooperation may result in a less severe penalty, and each violation will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Repeated infractions will impact the severity of punishment.
|
Did I reveal anything that was posted in private?
bubba, show me a guideline that states that I MUST put details in ROS.
Look at guideline number 22
Quote:
#22 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already becomed involved with the thread or post in particular.
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.
|
Was it absolutely necessary to censor/edit my thread? Absolutely necessary? Extreme circumstance? What was the extreme circumstance that you removed my text from the view of the female membership?
Please explain why YOU violated guideline number 22.
