an a hobbiest post a review of a VP that he HAS NOT even seen??

[Queen_Killee_Francois]

IS A HOBBIEST ALLOWED TO POST A REVIEW WITHOUT ACTUALLY EVER MEETING A VP???

Is this right or wrong??? seems really unfair. I could see if I arrived and a service was rendered but I wasn't ever even there. Should the review of me not showing up be posted in the men's powder room?? or wherever??? IDK just curious Thanks!

[lacrew_2000]

The review is not elible for credit, because no activities took place. However, this is an information board - if his account is true, most members would appreciate reading it.

His putting it in a review forum makes it a little more 'searchable', which could be an advantage...or a disadvantage, depending on your point of view....but it is an acceptable place to post the information. Again, the more information, the better, as far as the board is concerned.

If you outright dispute the veracity of the review, please let me know.

If you have another 'side' to his story (which happens often), you can start a thread in coed about it.