Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
At this point, it is clear that your only qualification for a position with Trump is just to agree with him. And if you have name recognition, that is a huge plus.
Hell, I thought he planned on ditching that federal government department anyway... if he wanted to prove that it is useless and a waste of money, he just did if she makes it through. To be honest though, at least here in Texas, the state decides so he may be correct about the actual usefulness of The Department of Education.
He appointed DeVos to destroy Education his first time around. She was so incompetent she literally was unable to fuck up a wet dream.
And she never took a Tombstone piledriver from the Mayor of Knox County, TN. On the other hand, she's the first Sec.Ed who will be represented by Mick Foley in a steel cage fatal 4-way.
In Texas, public education is an absolute joke and on its way to religiosity.
I like Trump’s picks. Folks kept telling themselves it won’t be as bad as democrats claimed. Trump is proving the Democrats rights and the “hold your nose and vote Trump” crowd wrong. I want them to be as incompetent and stupid as possible and they are heading there fast.
I like Trump’s picks. Folks kept telling themselves it won’t be as bad as democrats claimed. Trump is proving the Democrats rights and the “hold your nose and vote Trump” crowd wrong. I want them to be as incompetent and stupid as possible and they are heading there fast.
People should get what they vote for.
I totally agree, that the incompetent selections of Herr Trump will fully illuminate the level of incompetence and wretched stench as always...starts from the head down.
I totally agree, that the incompetent selections of Herr Trump...
So how now brown cow did that Nazi rhetoric work out for ya on November 5th? Yet still flinging it about now makes about as much sense as denying the existence of oxygen or gravity - IMMHO
I figure those who survive the confirmation process will be fired quickly and replaced with the stooges of Putin’s choosing.
How was yer figuring for the outcome of the election being so monumentally ginormous, resulting in total repudiation and decimation of all things Team D? Just curious.
Report: All Trump Nominees on ‘Solid Political Ground’ for Confirmation
The chances that President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees are confirmed by the Senate are quite good, according to Jeff Greenfield, a contributing writer at Politico Magazine...
Greenfield’s opinion contradicts the mainstream media’s narrative on the confirmation chances of Pete Hegseth, Matt Gaetz, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Big media outlets have been claiming for days the three have almost a zero chance of confirmation. Punchbowl News told readers last week Gaetz “can’t get confirmed.”
Greenfield, a Yale-trained lawyer and former speechwriter of President John F. Kennedy informed Politico Magazine readers that history supports the confirmation of Trump’s nominees, who he characterized as “the most unqualified individuals ever to be nominated.”
In an op-ed published Tuesday, Greenfield gave three reasons why all of Trump’s nominees will be confirmed:
“The last time a nominee was rejected on the floor of the Senate was in 1989.”
“Trump has consistently demonstrated his capacity to intimidate Republican legislators into doing his bidding.”
“[T]he Republican majority in the next Senate is wholly different from the majority Trump faced in his first term…”
Politico Toplines further summarized Greenfield’s argument:
Placing bets that the Senate will vote down some of Donald Trump’s more hair-raising Cabinet appointees? History might make you think twice. As POLITICO Magazine’s Jeff Greenfield writes in his latest column, it’s been nearly three and a half decades since the Senate rejected a president’s Cabinet nominee — and that streak isn’t likely to end now.
The Senate last bucked a Cabinet nominee back in 1989, when it voted against Sen. John Tower, George H.W. Bush’s pick to become Defense secretary. Tower was staring down accusations of substance abuse and sexual assault — sound familiar? — but those weren’t even the major factors in his defeat, which “was mostly a matter of party alignment,” Jeff writes.
Long story short: Don’t hold your breath: “The landscape of the Senate … suggests that the astonishing, almost contemptuous challenge Trump has made — confirm my picks or I will recess appoint them without your votes — is likely to succeed.”...