Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70796
biomed163313
Yssup Rider61021
gman4453296
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48678
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42739
CryptKicker37222
The_Waco_Kid37102
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2024, 06:55 AM   #1
VitaMan
Premium Access
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,366
Encounters: 70
Default Texas says Fed election monitors aren’t allowed in polling places

“Texas’ top elections official told the U.S. Department of Justice on Friday its election monitors aren’t permitted in Texas polling places after the agency announced plans to dispatch monitors to eight Texas counties on Election Day to ensure compliance with federal voting rights laws.”
VitaMan is online now   Quote
Old 11-02-2024, 01:11 PM   #2
ICU 812
Valued Poster
 
ICU 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 6,110
Encounters: 15
Default

Interesting:

LINK?
ICU 812 is offline   Quote
Old 11-02-2024, 01:27 PM   #3
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,102
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ICU 812 View Post
Interesting:

LINK?

vm doesn't post links just headlines


Texas tells U.S. Justice Department that federal election monitors aren’t allowed in polling places

https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11...tion-monitors/


Texas’ top elections official told the U.S. Department of Justice on Friday its election monitors aren’t permitted in Texas polling places after the agency announced plans to dispatch monitors to eight Texas counties on Election Day to ensure compliance with federal voting rights laws.


The Justice Department regularly sends monitors across the country to keep an eye out for potential voting rights violations during major elections. The agency said monitors would be on the ground in 86 jurisdictions in 27 states — including Atascosa, Bexar, Dallas, Frio, Harris, Hays, Palo Pinto and Waller counties.


Late Friday evening, Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson told the federal agency that its election monitors aren’t among those allowed inside Texas polling places or in central locations where ballots are counted under state law.


“Rest assured that Texas has robust processes and procedures in place to ensure that eligible voters may participate in a free and fair election,” Nelson wrote to a DOJ official Friday evening.


For decades, the Justice Department has dispersed election monitors across the country to observe procedures in polling sites and at places where ballots are counted. That was a power granted to the federal government under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which outlawed discriminatory voting practices and sought to equalize voting access. After the U.S. Supreme Court gutted parts of the law years ago, the agency now must get permission from state and local jurisdictions to be present or get a court order.


Officials in Florida and Missouri barred federal election monitors in 2022 — and this year, Arkansas officials told ABC News they wouldn’t be allowed there.


The agency didn’t say Friday why it picked those eight Texas counties — though it will send monitors to as many jurisdictions in Massachusetts. The Justice Department has regularly dispatched monitors to Texasincluding in 2022, when those monitors were sent to Dallas, Harris and Waller counties. A group of Texas Democrats at the local, state and federal level had called on the federal agency in September to send election monitors to the state’s five most populous counties — though it ultimately planned to send monitors to three of them.


The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s office told ABC News this week that state election inspectors would be sent to “various locations” throughout Texas.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 11-02-2024, 11:50 PM   #4
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,021
Encounters: 67
Default

Ain’t that something that makes you wanna say hmmmmmm.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old Yesterday, 05:31 AM   #5
Unique_Carpenter
Chasing a Cowgirl
 
Unique_Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 19, 2013
Location: West Kansas
Posts: 31,495
Encounters: 89
Default

YR, look at it this way:

Due to security issues, every "Federal monitor" will need to have a baby sitter assigned. There's simply insufficient staff for that. The only official authorized to assign monitors is a state's Secretary of State.

Our local sheriff has stated that they will arrest anyone that interferes with, or attempts to enter the county "counting" location. The local press has been instructed to be on the other side of the street, there will be no interviews, etc. and have accepted that. Something about a 3 day hold that starts Weds means that the earliest in front of a judge is the following Monday shut up the whiny reporters.

Seriously, all official results are issued by the Secretary of States office and no one else.
So what's the point in staking out the local offices by anyone.
Unique_Carpenter is offline   Quote
Old Yesterday, 07:13 AM   #6
yeahsurewhatev
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 19, 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 110
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter View Post
YR, look at it this way:

Due to security issues, every "Federal monitor" will need to have a baby sitter assigned. There's simply insufficient staff for that. The only official authorized to assign monitors is a state's Secretary of State.

Our local sheriff has stated that they will arrest anyone that interferes with, or attempts to enter the county "counting" location. The local press has been instructed to be on the other side of the street, there will be no interviews, etc. and have accepted that. Something about a 3 day hold that starts Weds means that the earliest in front of a judge is the following Monday shut up the whiny reporters.

Seriously, all official results are issued by the Secretary of States office and no one else.
So what's the point in staking out the local offices by anyone.
The point, according to the DOJ, is “to help assess compliance with the federal voting rights laws,” specifically identifying “discrimination or interference with the right to vote.”
Seems like how you get to the official result should matter.
yeahsurewhatev is online now   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved