Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
So what. He was appealing to voters who wanted to see a woman of color as the vice president. That doesn’t mean that it was the only criteria he used. Why does that make him a racist and why does that make her a diversity hire.
|
Look, not every female or minority nominee is a "diversity hire". Many prove their merit on the job. Kamala Harris did not. She has zero positive accomplishments to show for her 4 years as Veep. THAT is why people scoff and label her a diversity hire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
You keep harping on this fact like it means something but the fact is that it has no relevance whatsoever.
|
The guy who harped incessantly on it was Joe Biden, not me. He wanted to virtue-signal to liberal voters like yourself - "look at me, I'm so virtuous! I promise you I will pick a black female running mate (regardless of qualifications)!"
Evidently Joe Biden thought it was extremely relevant! Nobody will ever accuse him of being colorblind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
People who say that Kamala Harris is not qualified because she is black or a woman are spouting sexist and racist rhetoric.
|
Please go back to your post #29 and re-read your wikipedia definition of "straw man argument". You just delivered one.
Nobody is saying Kamala is not qualified because she is black or a woman. What people are thinking - and saying out loud in the runup to Election Day - is she's not qualified because she is an AIRHEAD. They see it every time she opens her mouth. No depth, no clarity of thought, no convictions, no accomplishments to speak of. Thoughtful, discerning people understand what a disaster it would be to put someone as shallow and vacuous as Kamala Harris in charge of our nation.