If DC Courts are majority Democrats and the SCOTUS majority Republicans

[Cody69]

If DC Courts are majority Democrats and the SCOTUS majority Republicans how is that any different?

How can the SCOTUS be allowed to make a decision about Trump being majority are Republican when you say DC Courts are prejudice because they are democrats? Is this what you guys are saying when you say double standard? Only when it affects something you guys want?

We see what they did with the abortions. And for the record I am totally against abortions but its none of my business its there choice not mine. They will have to answer for it not me. Everyone should have that kind of fun raising kids.

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by Cody69

If DC Courts are majority Democrats and the SCOTUS majority Republicans how is that any different?

Excellent question, Cody. I'd offer that the major difference would be that the DC Circuit Courts are filled with qualified judges who ended up there legitimately.

[lustylad]

... as did Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett at the SCOTUS.

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by lustylad

... as did Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett at the SCOTUS.

Only Gorsuch ended up there legitimately. The other two were the result of shady backroom deals and blatant hypocrisy.

[lustylad]

The screening and scrutiny process for SCOTUS nominees is more stringent, elaborate and exhaustive than for DC Circuit Court nominees, whom you seem certain were all "legitimately" appointed.

[Jacuzzme]

I enjoy these guys bitching about senate republicans finally using the power granted by their constituents when you know damn well democrats would have done EXACTLY the same thing we’re the situation reversed. Maximus Butthurtus.

Sorry fellas, Trump’s appointments are as legitimate as any other Justice to have ever served on the court. Best part is that they’re young, and will be pissing theses guys off for a generation.

[Cody69]

I see some of you guys are more worried about making snide remarks instead of answering the question. If it was reversed and it was Democrats that had the majority in the SCOTUS would you still feel the same?

I see you guys whine everyday of the democrat judge in New York, In DC, where ever there are a democrat judge that prosecutes Bone Spurs. If a Republican judge makes the right decision and prosecutes any political Republican well then he is a RINO and is no good.

The ones that sit back and make girly comments. What are they suppose to mean anyway? What value do they have here?

Actually why don't some of the ones that sit back and pick apart anyone whos trying to get to the bottom of things actually man up and post something. Don't be a sheep, start a thread by yourself. You can do it.

Berry not you bud, you post, wow do you post, LOL. I like what you post actually. We can be men and discuss things. Different views. All good.

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by Cody69

I see some of you guys are more worried about making snide remarks instead of answering the question. If it was reversed and it was Democrats that had the majority in the SCOTUS would you still feel the same?

I see you guys whine everyday of the democrat judge in New York, In DC, where ever there are a democrat judge that prosecutes Bone Spurs. If a Republican judge makes the right decision and prosecutes any political Republican well then he is a RINO and is no good.

Yeah, the Democrats certainly don't have the market cornered on whining. Holy moly, Republicans whine about everything and anything that doesn't go their way, which have been most things lately. "Deep state", "RINOs", "Voter fraud", you name it, they whine about it.

And I'm sorry, but if you don't see the blatant hypocrisy involved in how two of the current SCOTUS justices got their seats, you're simply being dishonest with yourself. It's insulting to any rational person's intelligence.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by tommy156

And I'm sorry, but if you don't see the blatant hypocrisy involved in how two of the current SCOTUS justices got their seats, you're simply being dishonest with yourself. It's insulting to any rational person's intelligence.

... Too right, mate... NOW, we are surely gettin' somewhere.

I do see a problem with two of the recent ones!

The girl that Trump put on - He said he wanted to add
a woman - and did so... Maybe she was the best person
for the job - maybe not. ... I'd rather see the
best person for the job than "filling a quota"...

And the last one that Biden added was a diversity hire.
Kinda the same thing that Trump did.

Would rather see the BEST person for the job.
Or at least one who has Australian bloodlines. ...

#### Salty

[lustylad]

Actually Salty, Amy Coney Barrett WAS the most qualified candidate for the job, as she demonstrated when she was grilled by the Senate Judiciary Committee about dozens of SCOTUS decisions and expertly answered question after question in great depth. And she did it all off the top of her head without scribbling down any notes.




By contrast, Biden's diversity hire dud couldn't even tell the Committee what the definition of a woman is.

[Cody69]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Actually Salty, Amy Coney Barrett WAS the most qualified candidate for the job, as she demonstrated when she was grilled by the Senate Judiciary Committee about dozens of SCOTUS decisions and expertly answered question after question in great depth. And she did it all off the top of her head without scribbling down any notes.




By contrast, Biden's diversity hire dud couldn't even tell the Committee what the definition of a woman is.

Lusty, I never had a doubt that your people were so much more qualified so much more of a man or more of a woman or better looking, drank more beer, never got drunk, but all of you are missing the point.

Anytime Bone Spurs goes to court and that is almost daily and if he gets a ruling against him, which is almost daily, it is either senile Biden's fault, or the Democrats fault, or a RINO fault, or all of the other millions of excuses. Bottom line, Its that peace of shits fault.

Get it? Trump is no fucking good. And if the rolls were reversed and they went to the SCOTUS and it was loaded against him and he lost as usual it would be because of all the excuses I just mentioned. Get it?

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by lustylad

By contrast, Biden's diversity hire dud couldn't even tell the Committee what the definition of a woman is.

[Dr-epg]

Gentlemen this thread needs reeled in and back on topic.