Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh > The Sandbox - Pittsburgh
test
The Sandbox - Pittsburgh The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here. If it's NOT an adult-themed topic, then it belongs here

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70831
biomed163764
Yssup Rider61304
gman4453377
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48840
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37431
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2024, 11:48 AM   #46
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... Smith knows that the 14th Amendment doesn't apply here.

And WHY all the whataboutism here with Trump?
Are we discussing Kamala getting BANNED or not?

### Salty
It's ok, salty. My point in starting this thread was to invite the comparison between trump and kamala.

Dems never get it - what's good for the goose is good for the gander!
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 01-06-2024, 11:57 AM   #47
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eyecu2 View Post
The element of insurrection; any and all including election interference, or inciting a riot, or conspiracy to defraud are the elements. Nobody gets charged with INSURRECTION. They get charged with the elements of the crime. I've posted elsewhere about this prior also. In Trumps case- he's facing a prosecution of exactly that.
Trump has been charged (by Special Counsel Jack Smith) with conspiracy to defraud the US and obstruct an official proceeding. He hasn't been convicted of anything. He hasn't even been charged with "insurrection" - an entirely different crime. Where do you come up with the argument they're the same? Please show me a link from a respected legal source instead of just tossing out your "theory".
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 01-06-2024, 12:01 PM   #48
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eyecu2 View Post
If Harris is taken off the ticket, what would be the reason?? Seeing as she faced no charges or any informal or formal accusations...
Go back and re-read my OP. The case for using the 14th Amendment to keep Kamala off the ballot is just as plausible, if not more so, as the rationale to keep trump off.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 01-06-2024, 02:21 PM   #49
onawbtngr546
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Feb 17, 2020
Location: PA
Posts: 2,810
Encounters: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Go back and re-read my OP. The case for using the 14th Amendment to keep Kamala off the ballot is just as plausible, if not more so, as the rationale to keep trump off.

If we are going to use that logic, then anyone who held office and publicly announced something similar to 'make sure you go out there and vote!' can also be charged for inciting a riot.


By your logic, if someone says something that directly, or indirectly results in a riot, even if they specifically do not say to riot, then they are inciting a riot.
That logic doesn't make sense. Harris never rallied a group of people to protest, riot or otherwise try to overthrow the government.


Saying she should be removed if just you saying 'well Trump is off the ballot! Lets take someone ELSE off the ballot so it is even!'
Adulting doesn't work like that.
onawbtngr546 is offline   Quote
Old 01-06-2024, 02:44 PM   #50
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by onawbtngr546 View Post
If we are going to use that logic, then anyone who held office and publicly announced something similar to 'make sure you go out there and vote!' can also be charged for inciting a riot.

No, now you're just being silly. Urging a big voter turnout is NOT inciting a riot.


By your logic, if someone says something that directly, or indirectly results in a riot, even if they specifically do not say to riot, then they are inciting a riot.

How about if they specifically say "you should peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard"?


That logic doesn't make sense. Harris never rallied a group of people to protest, riot or otherwise try to overthrow the government.

"They (rioters) are not going to stop... They're not going to let up, and they should not..."


Saying she should be removed is just you saying 'well Trump is off the ballot! Let's take someone ELSE off the ballot so it is even!'

Do you really think one side can weaponize and subvert the election rules with impunity, and the other side won't follow suit?


Adulting doesn't work like that.

Adulting? Is that even a word? Hmm... ok.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/adulting#:


You're trying to pick apart my "logic" regarding kamala's bad conduct - even though it's the same "logic" you use to argue trump's bad conduct should get him thrown off the ballot!

You seize on every argument to insist trump was guilty of "insurrection". Then you turn around and dismiss the same arguments when it comes to Kamala.

You assume the role of prosecutor against trump, then you pivot on a dime and act like a defense counsel for harris.

Why don't you just admit it's not cut-and-dried and reasonable people can disagree, ok?

It's not up to you, me or the Maine Secretary of State to decide. It has to be decided in a court of law, where trump (or kamala) are accorded full due process rights to defend themselves. And at the end of the day if you truly believe in democracy, it should be decided at the ballot box.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 01-06-2024, 03:40 PM   #51
1#Ratt
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Oct 28, 2023
Location: earth
Posts: 132
Encounters: 4
Default

I'm glad the OP now admits that trump committed insurrection. of course, it also shows much of a hypocrite he has been.
1#Ratt is offline   Quote
Old 01-06-2024, 04:03 PM   #52
eyecu2
Premium Access
 
eyecu2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 21, 2011
Location: Bonerville
Posts: 6,023
Encounters: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Trump has been charged (by Special Counsel Jack Smith) with conspiracy to defraud the US and obstruct an official proceeding. He hasn't been convicted of anything. He hasn't even been charged with "insurrection" - an entirely different crime. Where do you come up with the argument they're the same? Please show me a link from a respected legal source instead of just tossing out your "theory".
What Is Insurrection and Rebellion?
The term "insurrection" is generally described as a violent uprising or organized resistance against the government or its regulations.

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or Insurrection
Rebellion and insurrection charges can be filed if you destroy property to overthrow the government.
It usually involves acts intended to overthrow, disrupt, or challenge the authority of the United States or impede federal law enforcement.

The term "rebellion" is generally described as an organized, armed, violent resistance or opposition to established government authority or its laws.

Rebellion is often a broader and more coordinated effort than insurrection, which is focused on overthrowing the existing governmental structure.

To convict you of violating U.S.C. 2383, federal prosecutors must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, all the elements of the crime, including that you did all of the following:

Knowingly incited, engaged. or gave aid and comfort to a rebellion or insurrection;
The rebellion was against the authority of the United States or its laws;
The illegal actions were willful and intentional.
What Are the Related Federal Laws?
18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 Treason, Sedition, and Subversive Activities have several federal statutes that are related to 18 U.S.C. 2383 rebellion or insurrection, such as the following:

18 U.S.C. 2381 - Treason;
18 U.S.C. 2382 - Misprision of treason;
18 U.S.C. 2384 - Seditious conspiracy;
18 U.S.C. 2385 - Advocating the overthrow of Government;
18 U.S.C. 2386 - Registration of certain organizations;
18 U.S.C. 2387 - Activities affecting armed forces generally;
18 U.S.C. 2388 - Activities affecting armed forces during war;
18 U.S.C. 2389 - Recruiting for service against the United States;
18 U.S.C. 2390 - Enlistment to serve against the United States;
40 U.S.C. 5104 - Unlawful activities.
Notably, 18 U.S. Code 2384 Seditious Conspiracy law says, “If two or more persons in any jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall….”

Related crimes are often more specific to the actions that were observed , vs the overarching crime of rebellion, or insurrection. Hope that clears it up.
eyecu2 is offline   Quote
Old 01-06-2024, 04:41 PM   #53
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1#Ratt View Post
I'm glad the OP now admits that trump committed insurrection.
No, I didn't. Please cite where I said that. I'll wait.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 1#Ratt View Post
of course, it also shows much of a hypocrite he has been.
No, the hypocrite is anyone who insists that trump is guilty of insurrection - but Kamala & others who egged on the BLM/antifa rioters are not.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 01-06-2024, 04:49 PM   #54
Dr-epg
Moderator
 
Dr-epg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 29,322
Encounters: 45
Default

Gentlemen last warning. Back on topic this is not about Trump and the 14th

Kamala is the topic
Dr-epg is offline   Quote
Old 01-06-2024, 07:10 PM   #55
onawbtngr546
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Feb 17, 2020
Location: PA
Posts: 2,810
Encounters: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr-epg View Post
Gentlemen last warning. Back on topic this is not about Trump and the 14th

Kamala is the topic
I'm not sure how we are supposed to discuss removing Harris from the ballot without mentioning the 14th, and discussing how other candidates should be removed from the ballot for the same thing. Any advice?
onawbtngr546 is offline   Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 06:59 AM   #56
Chase7
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 21, 2019
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 528
Default

Harris will not be on the ballet because she is an “Incompetent Laughingstock”, simple as that!
Another Obama failure.
Chase7 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved