Encounter: Test the limits

[paintedbynumbers]

Originally Posted by blckstuff412

[suspiciouscouch]

Originally Posted by Wolf3168

I don't consider this rape, but I do consider it taking advantage of someone who was obviously desperate for money.

That's like... an awful lot of what happens in the hobby isn't it?

[pittlicker]

Taking advantage happens both ways.

[cabot]

Originally Posted by wheretogo

I gotta tell you, I feel a little sick after reading this. I get it, most of the women WORKING in what we call a “hobby” do it out of what we hope is their choice.

Wheretogo - I literally don't understand where you're coming from, or your perspective. I see your reviews, and see that you see AMPs a lot - you think those girls jack you off because they just love all that strange dick? Or do they make a choice that they're ok with sexual acts for money - as a 'choice'..? One could also easily argue that a Chinese woman here who doesn't speak english, can't get around easily, and is beholden to the spa 'owner' has a hell of a lot less 'choice' than this girl who picked $700 for 2 hours.

Or how about your review where you 'bartered' a bit, and negotiated the rate.... do you think that worked because she loves banging your dick, and the money was purely a sidebar? No - she needed money, you needed pussy, and you saved some money by negotiating. Why is your willingness to pay her $120 to bang her, worse than this reviewer paying a girl $700 to bang her? Do you think your girl would have rather taken his dick, or yours?

He negotiated, you negotiated - the basis of this is that the girl is there voluntarily, and decided to sell sexual acts in exchange for money. Her choice, and we decide that we're ok with a woman doing that - because they're independent adults, not children that need looking after.

So - this is not an attack; I just literally have no idea how you can say that paying a girl $700(!!) for 2 hours is totally different than banging some girl at a reduced rate($120!!), because she 'needs the money'....or having some random Chinese mom jack you off, because you want to get off and she 'needs' the money. If you can explain it to me, I'd be curious. Or maybe, on reflection, you took there to be some element of coercion or force that was not actually mentioned in the review. He used the same thing thing you did (we ALL do) when we negotiate - money, and a mutual agreement of what something is worth and the relative value.

C

[pittlicker]

Well-spoken Cabot

[paintedbynumbers]

Originally Posted by cabot

Wheretogo - I literally don't understand where you're coming from, or your perspective. I see your reviews, and see that you see AMPs a lot - you think those girls jack you off because they just love all that strange dick? Or do they make a choice that they're ok with sexual acts for money - as a 'choice'..? One could also easily argue that a Chinese woman here who doesn't speak english, can't get around easily, and is beholden to the spa 'owner' has a hell of a lot less 'choice' than this girl who picked $700 for 2 hours.

Or how about your review where you 'bartered' a bit, and negotiated the rate.... do you think that worked because she loves banging your dick, and the money was purely a sidebar? No - she needed money, you needed pussy, and you saved some money by negotiating. Why is your willingness to pay her $120 to bang her, worse than this reviewer paying a girl $700 to bang her? Do you think your girl would have rather taken his dick, or yours?

He negotiated, you negotiated - the basis of this is that the girl is there voluntarily, and decided to sell sexual acts in exchange for money. Her choice, and we decide that we're ok with a woman doing that - because they're independent adults, not children that need looking after.

So - this is not an attack; I just literally have no idea how you can say that paying a girl $700(!!) for 2 hours is totally different than banging some girl at a reduced rate($120!!), because she 'needs the money'....or having some random Chinese mom jack you off, because you want to get off and she 'needs' the money. If you can explain it to me, I'd be curious. Or maybe, on reflection, you took there to be some element of coercion or force that was not actually mentioned in the review. He used the same thing thing you did (we ALL do) when we negotiate - money, and a mutual agreement of what something is worth and the relative value.

C

first and foremost I agree with everything you said here. I just don't feel you should have singled out wheretogo on this. You literally have Deja Vu calling the OP a rapist, mentioning in other posts how mods are allowing this review to stay up and flat out accusing the OP of rape. If this review made wheretogo feel sick that's ok. It's his opinion and he can have it. But to accuse the OP of rape and not being banned for it in my opinion is 100% bullshit. Whether he got points or not isn't the issue. You shouldn't be able to slander someone like that and not get banned for it. Again 100% my opinion but I am sure others agree.

[onawbtngr546]

I was going to throw a reply in the other day, but others have covered what I would had said already.


We are all in the hobby, and know that more or less there is a mutual agreement of a provider providing services for money. What they use that money for, because they 'need' to, or 'want' to, is none of our business.

Nobody would bat an eye at this review is the OP didn't state why she needed money. I see nothing wrong with what happened here as everything was discussed before hand.

[Dogface78]

Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

I was going to throw a reply in the other day, but others have covered what I would had said already.


We are all in the hobby, and know that more or less there is a mutual agreement of a provider providing services for money. What they use that money for, because they 'need' to, or 'want' to, is none of our business.

Nobody would bat an eye at this review is the OP didn't state why she needed money. I see nothing wrong with what happened here as everything was discussed before hand.

I think that the problem arose when he said he , but as it has already been covered they were in agreement.
Do no harm no foul, and had this review been written in the proper section of the forum nothing at all would have been said.

[Déjà vu]

Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

I was going to throw a reply in the other day, but others have covered what I would had said already.


We are all in the hobby, and know that more or less there is a mutual agreement of a provider providing services for money. What they use that money for, because they 'need' to, or 'want' to, is none of our business.

Nobody would bat an eye at this review is the OP didn't state why she needed money. I see nothing wrong with what happened here as everything was discussed before hand.

[Cantigetausername]

I had written it in the proper section. The mod came in and moved it. He said didn't meet criteria bc didn't have phone attached so he moved it. Not sure why to here.

On a different note, it is definitely pretty funny some of the responses. This hobby isn't about wining and dining. It's strictly (mainly) about sex. If a provider agrees to do whatever the person wants and accepts payment for it, what's the problem? Are there really that many people on here who think the girl actually cares about them if they didn't have money for her?

[onawbtngr546]

Originally Posted by Cantigetausername

I had written it in the proper section. The mod came in and moved it. He said didn't meet criteria bc didn't have phone attached so he moved it. Not sure why to here.

On a different note, it is definitely pretty funny some of the responses. This hobby isn't about wining and dining. It's strictly (mainly) about sex. If a provider agrees to do whatever the person wants and accepts payment for it, what's the problem? Are there really that many people on here who think the girl actually cares about them if they didn't have money for her?

That's a little bit absurd. Their contact information was provided, in a link. No different for girls who are on seeking and want to be contacted there first.

[Cantigetausername]

Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

That's a little bit absurd. Their contact information was provided, in a link. No different for girls who are on seeking and want to be contacted there first.

He said bc it's a private site not everyone has access to it.

[onawbtngr546]

That's the same deal with seeking, and just posting those links to their profile is wholly acceptable. Wow

[Cantigetausername]

Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

That's the same deal with seeking, and just posting those links to their profile is wholly acceptable. Wow

That's what I thought but not fighting it. Not like a big deal.

[pensfan123456]

Cabot-

You said exactly what I would have said. For once one of your novels was warranted lol.