Encounter: Relaxing time with Stephanie Hepburn

[btfree]

User ID: 462032
Date: Oct 2018
Name: Stephanie Hepburn
Phone: -
Email Address: StephanieHepburnVip@protonmail .com
URL (Profile or Bio Page): https://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=462032
City: Las Vegas
State: Nevada
Address: Airport Hotel
Appointment Type: Outcall
Activities: LFK, DFK, teasing, FIV, CBJ, doggy, CG
Duration of Encounter: Multi-hour
Hair Length and Color: Red
Age: 23
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Young women with a petite frame, cute bubble butt, great C/D breast, and about 5' 6". Looks just like her pictures.
Recommendation: Yes

[lionsntigers]

[rodeoplayboy]

[Ace Johnson]

But I don't care as cbj only is a deal breaker for me even though she seems like a good time otherwise.

[kcone]

[IQ160]

Originally Posted by Ace Johnson

You guys are right, no donation here, Erotic Monkey or P411 either. But I don't care as cbj only is a deal breaker for me even though she seems like a good time otherwise.

That's why I posted the question in the Coed Discussions forum. If the provider is a retired porn actress, then don't they realize that covered oral is a deal breaker for most hobbyists, even if the provider is good otherwise? It still makes no sense to me. I like Stephanie but I won't visit her because of that.

[jmaster299]

Originally Posted by IQ160

That's why I posted the question in the Coed Discussions forum. If the provider is a retired porn actress, then don't they realize that covered oral is a deal breaker for most hobbyists, even if the provider is good otherwise? It still makes no sense to me. I like Stephanie but I won't visit her because of that.

Well, as a former porn star she is used to every dick she sucks being tested before she sucks it. I've never understood this nonsense of refusing to see girls who won't do BBBJ.

I used to refuse BBBJ. It's honestly a safety issue and now I only accept it if I feel it's safe too. If you really have a problem with a girl trying to protect herself from a laundry list of STDs, you have a problem.

Plenty of crap a girl can catch from a guy showing no physical signs of being sick.

[IQ160]

Originally Posted by jmaster299

Well, as a former porn star she is used to every dick she sucks being tested before she sucks it. I've never understood this nonsense of refusing to see girls who won't do BBBJ.

I used to refuse BBBJ. It's honestly a safety issue and now I only accept it if I feel it's safe too. If you really have a problem with a girl trying to protect herself from a laundry list of STDs, you have a problem.

Plenty of crap a girl can catch from a guy showing no physical signs of being sick.

Which is why I get tested every couple of months, and have always been negative (I don’t hobby enough anymore to warrant more often than that). Fortunately, there are several other providers that I will visit. And I have no problem with any provider’s restrictions, it is just good to know about them ahead of time to make an informed choice. However, when a provider advertises a GFE experience, there are certain expectations with that abbreviation.

[jmaster299]

Originally Posted by IQ160

Which is why I get tested every couple of months, and have always been negative (I don’t hobby enough anymore to warrant more often than that). Fortunately, there are several other providers that I will visit. And I have no problem with any provider’s restrictions, it is just good to know about them ahead of time to make an informed choice. However, when a provider advertises a GFE experience, there are certain expectations with that abbreviation.

You are wrong on all counts there pal. Getting tested "every few months" is useless for the point you are trying to make. You can literally be infecting people for months between tests and not know it. Porn stars are tested every couple of weeks, some times more as certain studios will require a fresh test specifically for their scene.

It's also obvious you do have a problem with providers restrictions as you are doing all you can to bash every woman who won't put her health at risk to go bare for you.

Lastly, there is zero service expectation attached to GFE. Try asking any provider and they'll tell you this. You may have an expectation attached to it service wise, but that's your false assumption. Take a minute to talk to providers about GFE, especially ones who offer different levels of service beyond GFE, and they'll tell you GFE means how they behave attitude wise, not the services they offer. It never, EVER, means bare anything.

GFE means they will act sweet, listen to your direction. Making it different from PSE where they are more aggressive or enthusiastic in their actions and movements. GFE is soft while PSE is hard, but there is never the promise of bare anything unless they advertise a menu that says as much.

[vegasmatt]

Originally Posted by jmaster299

You are wrong on all counts there pal. Getting tested "every few months" is useless for the point you are trying to make. You can literally be infecting people for months between tests and not know it. Porn stars are tested every couple of weeks, some times more as certain studios will require a fresh test specifically for their scene.

It's also obvious you do have a problem with providers restrictions as you are doing all you can to bash every woman who won't put her health at risk to go bare for you.

Lastly, there is zero service expectation attached to GFE. Try asking any provider and they'll tell you this. You may have an expectation attached to it service wise, but that's your false assumption. Take a minute to talk to providers about GFE, especially ones who offer different levels of service beyond GFE, and they'll tell you GFE means how they behave attitude wise, not the services they offer. It never, EVER, means bare anything.

GFE means they will act sweet, listen to your direction. Making it different from PSE where they are more aggressive or enthusiastic in their actions and movements. GFE is soft while PSE is hard, but there is never the promise of bare anything unless they advertise a menu that says as much.

I guarantee most men feel GFE=BBBJ and more.

[jmaster299]

Originally Posted by vegasmatt

I guarantee most men feel GFE=BBBJ and more.

And I guarantee most providers do not. Where those guys got that incorrect notion in their head is their own damn fault. Take two seconds to pay attention to what providers talk about. Switter is a great place to see candid comments like that.

Assume all you want, you'll still be wrong. And that's the heart of the issue, never, ever see a provider assuming a service is offered that hasn't been specifically advertised. When you make an assumption like that, then bash the provider because your assumption was incorrect, that makes you the problem.

If GFE meant BBBJ "and more" there would be no need for providers to spell out exactly what they offer or for guys to spell out exactly what they received in their reviews.

If you insist on only seeing providers who will risk kissing, BBBJ, DATY, "and more" that's on you. But stop bashing providers who are unwilling to put their health at risk for you. You may be clean, or claim to be clean, but what about all the other clients she sees???

I'm sorry, but this constant bashing of providers who won't go bare for you all is a bit sickening.

[vegasmatt]

Originally Posted by jmaster299

And I guarantee most providers do not. Where those guys got that incorrect notion in their head is their own damn fault. Take two seconds to pay attention to what providers talk about. Switter is a great place to see candid comments like that.

Assume all you want, you'll still be wrong. And that's the heart of the issue, never, ever see a provider assuming a service is offered that hasn't been specifically advertised. When you make an assumption like that, then bash the provider because your assumption was incorrect, that makes you the problem.

If GFE meant BBBJ "and more" there would be no need for providers to spell out exactly what they offer or for guys to spell out exactly what they received in their reviews.

If you insist on only seeing providers who will risk kissing, BBBJ, DATY, "and more" that's on you. But stop bashing providers who are unwilling to put their health at risk for you. You may be clean, or claim to be clean, but what about all the other clients she sees???

I'm sorry, but this constant bashing of providers who won't go bare for you all is a bit sickening.

LOL

[Boltfan]

The posters have expressed their opinions on both sides. So long as it remains civil the discussion can continue. This is not an opinion, regardless of the popularity, that needs to be stifled.

[jmaster299]

Originally Posted by Boltfan

The posters have expressed their opinions on both sides. So long as it remains civil the discussion can continue. This is not an opinion, regardless of the popularity, that needs to be stifled.

Does it really belong I reviews? People aren't expressing an opinion on what something means, they are openly attacking providers, in their own reviews, for refusing unsafe sex.

[Boltfan]

It is relevant to the reviewed provider. All parties may discuss so long as it remains on the topic of the review and remains civil.