Tomorrow night

[herky]

Wow, agree, there was no call for that.

Originally Posted by Parttimehobbyist

Not cool man. Not cool when you bring up kids into this topic. I understand you’ve had issues with Ginger in the past, but there are other ways to go about it without mentioning kids.

I’ve had the privilege of seeing both Chloe and Ginger and I’ve gotta say both these ladies are magnificent, discrete, independent, professional, courteous, attentive, (insert positive adjective), etc. To put it simply, they “get it.” Just do yourself a favor and read their stellar reviews and you’ll understand why they are top elite world class courtesans.

Then you brought up their age. I can confirm they are not “old.” Without a doubt, they would put soooooo many of the younger generation of providers to shame. As a matter of fact, these younger ladies can learn a thing or 2 from Chloe and Ginger.

Another thing I can confirm is that Gingy doesnt bring her grandkids to sessions. We hung out recently and I only saw one (1) toothbrush and no evidence of kids in the premises. Seriously though, not sure why you would make those things up when you haven’t seen her.

Anyhoo, not sure why I’m posting this since this thread will probably close down soon. Meh.

[WMJ4657]

Some choose to stay in the shadows & not say much so you never truly know but when you walk out into the sunlight you will get exsposed!!

[Guest110920]

Originally Posted by BuxomBeauty

I find it curiously obvious that BIOMED the moderator, staff edited the comments here yet ALLOWS ALL OF THE WOLF IN THE FOLD THREAD which is BLATANT GUIDELINE INFRACTION OF TARGETING to run rampant and UNEDITED FOR MONTHS then reopen 6 months later still with no staff edit.
This shows the true hypocrisy of your moderator. Wonder if i need to schedule a session with him too. Maybe I'll receive equal protection under the guidelines as well.
I guess egregious is in the eye of the beholder regardless of if it violates eccie guidelines or not.
Its almost like certain members are being told when and how to circumvent the guidelines and how to target other members. I'd like to see this guideline enforcement be applied across the board and not just to the extreme veterans of the board. Bc it is blatantly obvious that it has been.

Wow, it's been a while since you've posted (except ads). And yet here you are. Many people probably don't know what you're talking about so in case anyone needs context to catch up and evaluate the statements made above, the referenced thread is here: https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2342631


BTW I got no points or warnings from that thread, best I can recall. I probably would today, under the new guidelines update, but it was a different time. And no, I haven't scheduled any sessions with biomed. Let's just put that one to bed right now. Ew.

[JdeHog]

Originally Posted by biomed1

Staff can only act when there is proof of a Guidelines Violation

What kind of proof do you need? A post blatantly accusing a provider of having minors present during hobby activities and of having substance abuse problems isn't proof enough? Hell, I've been dinged a couple times for mentioning controlled substances in my posts. Talk about double standards.

[biomed1]

Originally Posted by JdeHog

What kind of proof do you need? A post blatantly accusing a provider of having minors present during hobby activities and of having substance abuse problems isn't proof enough? Hell, I've been dinged a couple times for mentioning controlled substances in my posts. Talk about double standards.

If someone made a post that blatantly said you had 7 toes on 1 foot an 12 toes on the other foot, what exactly does that prove?


To answer your question, Eccie need proof that a violation occurred. That would be documentation that has not been handled or altered and the audit trail substantiates that is real and unaltered.


Righteous Indignation does not prove a violation has occurred.

[biomed1]

Originally Posted by BuxomBeauty

I find it curiously obvious that BIOMED the moderator, staff edited the comments here yet ALLOWS ALL OF THE WOLF IN THE FOLD THREAD which is BLATANT GUIDELINE INFRACTION OF TARGETING to run rampant and UNEDITED FOR MONTHS then reopen 6 months later still with no staff edit.
This shows the true hypocrisy of your moderator. Wonder if i need to schedule a session with him too. Maybe I'll receive equal protection under the guidelines as well.
I guess egregious is in the eye of the beholder regardless of if it violates eccie guidelines or not.
Its almost like certain members are being told when and how to circumvent the guidelines and how to target other members. I'd like to see this guideline enforcement be applied across the board and not just to the extreme veterans of the board. Bc it is blatantly obvious that it has been.

Originally Posted by SpankyJ

Wow, it's been a while since you've posted (except ads). And yet here you are. Many people probably don't know what you're talking about so in case anyone needs context to catch up and evaluate the statements made above, the referenced thread is here: https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2342631


BTW I got no points or warnings from that thread, best I can recall. I probably would today, under the new guidelines update, but it was a different time. And no, I haven't scheduled any sessions with biomed. Let's just put that one to bed right now. Ew.

Neither one of you could afford a session with me. . .

[biomed1]

Originally Posted by WMJ4657

Some choose to stay in the shadows & not say much so you never truly know but when you walk out into the sunlight you will get exsposed!!

There is a great deal of truth in this statement.
Many here could benefit by heading its advice.

[austin88998833]

Originally Posted by biomed1

Neither one of you could afford a session with me. . .

Guys guys guys! That would not be pretty! Now I can’t get these awful pictures out of my head. Please please no more!

https://youtu.be/0kja30aeU80

[Lacie Foxx]

All I can say is WOW, smh

[Sidinman78]

How should I ask again without the chaos?