let's test the new rules out

[ztonk]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

It's getting to the point where if a member writes a "No review" that is considered rude and insulting!! Just pay attention and you'll see !! By the new definitions and the ways the mods. are implementing the rules a "No review" is considered a personal and unnecessary attack !

Originally Posted by Whispers

Back in the day of a corrupt ASPD many a NO review was made to disappear to appease one of he local prostitutes.

It appears we could be headed in that direction.

I respectfully disagree... one of the guiding tenets has always been that we don't delete content from the site. However, hate speech, bullying, and harassment can no longer be tolerated (not that it should have ever been tolerated) which is why you've seen some content removed.

And it's pure craziness to think that a "no review" would be removed just because it is a no review. We've all had encounters where, for whatever reason, we didn't "click" with a particular lady. What reason would there be to remove that? Express your opinion without being overly insulting or rude and you'll be just fine.

ztonk

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by ztonk

I respectfully disagree... one of the guiding tenets has always been that we don't delete content from the site. However, hate speech, bullying, and harassment can no longer be tolerated (not that it should have ever been tolerated) which is why you've seen some content removed.

And it's pure craziness to think that a "no review" would be removed just because it is a no review. We've all had encounters where, for whatever reason, we didn't "click" with a particular lady. What reason would there be to remove that? Express your opinion without being overly insulting or rude and you'll be just fine.

ztonk

There's a new one! Overly insulting or rude. So only the mods. can determine what's overly insulting? So we can insult a little bit? By that comment alone my posts that got me infractions last night more than fall under this threshold! And I never said a no review would be removed. I was making the point that any description of someone[s] looks performance incall etc. in a review that is negative could and can insult someone! Which results in more mod action. This is a very slippery slope! It is however mirroring America. We are catering to the few, at the expense of the many!

[Kickrocks]

Yup

[ztonk]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

There's a new one! Overly insulting or rude. So only the mods. can determine what's overly insulting? So we can insult a little bit?

As long as you aren't:

Insulting Others
Targeting other members for attacks
Harassing other members, groups of members, class of members, etc
Disrespecting other members on the site
General rudeness toward other members on the site

you are fine. We are just enforcing the guidelines that you agree to every time you log into the site.

For those members who aren't insulting others all the time, the line is obvious.

ztonk

[JalapenoPopper]

Not true i got a infraction for talking about a old provider(no longer a member) that is no longer on this site.



https://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=1...post1060812060 ...post 5

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by Little Monster

And right here Old-T is where you display your typical & usual hypocrisy. Classic Old-T to a fucking T!!!!

You seriously need to learn how to heed your own advice before you come on here with your usual "holier than thou" Bull Shit!
So it's ok for you to display YOUR opinions in a derogatory manner, but it's not ok for others to do the same???
That is exactly the behavior you have just displayed old man.
Practice what you preach Old Man, cause if you don't I will continue to expose you for you truly are, you wanna keep this going? Then let's go!

Typical of the kind of reply I expect from some folks here. So in your mind saying someone had a dyslexic moment is equivalent to the far more toxic venom directed at posters--often the ladies--month after month?

You, who have gone on some epic rants in just the past few weeks?

Sure. Right. Whatever you say, Boss.

It seems you, WD, and some others are trying to make the argument that the board is black and white when it comes to disagreement and insults. Most folks I know know that is an oversimplification.

I guess that is why mods get the big bucks, to decide which are acceptable and which are not. If they let me know my comments are too derogatory I will pay attention. When you tell me, I will chalk it up to your long track record of seeing the world "differently" than I do.

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by ztonk

And it's pure craziness to think that a "no review" would be removed just because it is a no review. We've all had encounters where, for whatever reason, we didn't "click" with a particular lady. What reason would there be to remove that?

ztonk

And many have had sessions where the prostitute that showed up weighed 25% more than the pictures in her ad displayed.... or had a face pockmarked from Acne that had been airbrushed out of the picture...... or she had done so many sessions prior she smelled of condoms in her crotch and looked like shit from the wear and tear....

Guys might not be as prone to being "polite" in the heat of the moment writing the review and then a girls WKs start to cry foul because he was rude or attacked the lying deceptive twat they worship......

I think those are the kinds of reviews that are most likely to "disappear" if they are moderated as has been suggested....

And that is valuable information to many.

[Kickrocks]

Originally Posted by JalapenoPopper

Not true i got a infraction for talking about a old provider(no longer a member) that is no longer on this site.



https://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=1...post1060812060 ...post 5

Because you wrote whore?

[Dev Null]

I applaud the mods for trying to keep the toxic venom down. I'm not so sure about them getting the big bucks, and much more likely that they are way underpaid and way underappreciated.

So here's a shout out to the mods, who have a big job ahead of them dealing with this post-respectability rebellion.

Old-T, you are a voice crying in the wilderness, may you continue for a long long time.

And to all the wonderful ladies of ECCIE, here's looking at you. Hope that you can keep it in your business plan to maintain our fragile male egos. We may not all admit it, but we need that more than you can imagine.

[ztonk]

Originally Posted by Whispers

And many have had sessions where the prostitute that showed up weighed 25% more than the pictures in her ad displayed.... or had a face pockmarked from Acne that had been airbrushed out of the picture...... or she had done so many sessions prior she smelled of condoms in her crotch and looked like shit from the wear and tear....

I don't see any of those being a violation... an encounter report is a guy describing the time he spent with a lady by expressing his opinion and relating facts. Those are all first-hand opinions and observations.

However, if he went hyperbolic and wrote something like "I thought I smelled her foul pussy from the parking lot and I nearly fell over when she opened the door as the full stench hit my nostrils" ... that would be unnecessary rudeness. In that case, I would expect the moderator reviewing the encounter report for Premium Access credit to issue a warning/infraction, but we certainly wouldn't remove the review for that (an edit probably...)

ztonk

[JalapenoPopper]

Originally Posted by Kickrocks

Because you wrote whore?

Reason: Unnecessary Rudeness


towards a non member ...so that debunks post 94

[Kickrocks]

Lmao! So how do you describe a stinky pussy without sounding mean?

You see how crazy this is? I can understand taking it down a notch on the insults and rudeness. But it's subjective, what one person thinks is rude another does not.

Dont let this place turn into a snowflake protecting site like the rest of social media has become.

[Kickrocks]

Originally Posted by JalapenoPopper

Reason: Unnecessary Rudeness


towards a non member ...so that debunks post 94

So if you call a prostitute a whore, its a violation now?

[JalapenoPopper]

Originally Posted by Kickrocks

So if you call a prostitute a whore, its a violation now?

Even less call them average looking or meh.......got another infraction for post 7



https://eccie.net/private.php?do=showpm&pmid=39977947

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by ztonk

As long as you aren't:

Insulting Others
Targeting other members for attacks
Harassing other members, groups of members, class of members, etc
Disrespecting other members on the site
General rudeness toward other members on the site

you are fine. We are just enforcing the guidelines that you agree to every time you log into the site.

For those members who aren't insulting others all the time, the line is obvious.

ztonk

Again, why are you making this personal? Do we have a problem ? You know you pointed me just to prove a point! Many times I have come to you about banned members with new accounts/and or multi handles.. Real proof, and with most of the board knowing who that new handle is. Just about each time you said their was not enough to go on! WTF!! But yet everyone knew who it was. Right now you are allowing someone to use their mandle account even after their original was banned! And that mandle account is coming off of a 2 week ban for violating a supreme directive that was issued too his original handle! Why is this allowed to happen? Guidelines should not have to be quoted to a mod !
But yet to clean up the forums you point me for using an emoji !? The other had no mention of anyone. It was a post to make a point. And I made it to myself.
Again why are you making this personal?