When will I.B. quit being a liar?

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The 2010 Census is a VALID source that shows the population of voting age, M T Brain Socket. That you imagine there's a better source proves how fucking stupid you really are, M T Brain Socket.

Yes it was pretty close. Close enough to prove your numbers are wrong with it or the actual numbers you idiot. That is the whole point. the number of registered voters is less than the estimated eligible. 5 million registered is well under the number eligible.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Even though Mr. DOTY 5 Times might quit " campaigning " due to his " Lyin Lyndon-esque ' run away with this election, can't we still continue to " roust " the " absentee " cemetery voters to his victory like the lyin libs do on every important election ? !?!?! I've benn to MANY veterans funerals that have given me their " proxy " vote to vote AGAINST anything associated with the fudge packers, rainbow flag bearers and gloryhole operators !

The Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM just ain't happy without his DOTY crown.

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You were right Yssup! That one nut-licker will reply to anything.
Ever since he lost his Snuggle buddy Luke he has tried to court every homophobic dotard on the forum.
I see he even has a matching tagline now. They make a cute couple.IBRey

You'd be the nut-licker cuddling up to the dip-shit emeritus, M T Brain Socket.

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Yes it was pretty close. Close enough to prove your numbers are wrong with it or the actual numbers you idiot. That is the whole point. the number of registered voters is less than the estimated eligible. 5 million registered is well under the number eligible.

Once again you prove that you're too stupid to understand what you read, M T Brain Socket. JW reported that Los Angeles county officials reported that the number is "a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age", M T Brain Socket. No where in the article does it say what you are misrepresenting it says in this forum, M T Brain Socket. Hence, you've been handed your miserable, no-account ass every time you say it says something different, M T Brain Socket.

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM just ain't happy without his DOTY crown.

You'd be the nut-licker cuddling up to the dip-shit emeritus, M T Brain Socket.


Once again you prove that you're too stupid to understand what you read, M T Brain Socket. JW reported that Los Angeles county officials reported that the number is "a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age", M T Brain Socket. No where in the article does it say what you are misrepresenting it says in this forum, M T Brain Socket. Hence, you've been handed your miserable, no-account ass every time you say it says something different, M T Brain Socket.

WTF? If you could do simple math you would see my numbers are based on that idiot. There was 5 million voters registered so show me how that is 144% of the eligible. And JW did not report that either. they repeated a rumor and what they meant was there were a 144% of registered voters of the amount that actually voted. As in 3.5 million X 144% is 5.4 million ( numbers are rounded to help the imbecile understand them)

[MT Pockets]

So here is the latest on the I B a Liars assertion of so many extra voters in LA county.
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-...166187232.html

California voter registration stood at 19.4 million as of February. No California county is anywhere close to having more voters than its estimated number of citizens deemed eligible to vote.

Dean Logan, the registrar-recorder/county clerk for Los Angeles County, which has about 1.3 million inactive voters, said the lists serve as a voting “fail-safe” for people who have moved and are otherwise eligible to vote. A relative handful of inactive voters showed up last fall, he said.

So there you have it. The correct amount and the reason for having them all rolled into one. Seems like IB is wrong again LOL! Here is some light reading.
https://www.eac.gov/assets/1/6/2016_...ive_Report.pdf

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

So here is the latest on the I B a Liars assertion of so many extra voters in LA county.
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-...166187232.html

So there you have it. The correct amount and the reason for having them all rolled into one. Seems like IB is wrong again LOL! Here is some light reading.
https://www.eac.gov/assets/1/6/2016_...ive_Report.pdf

Your own article explains exactly how JW arrived at the number they did, M T Brain Socket, and California law stipulates that any one turning up at the poll using the name of any one of those names on the inactive lists are entitled to vote, you dick-sucking queer ... and the names are posted publicly in the polling place on the day of the election encouraging voter fraud, M T Brain Socket.

Judicial Watch’s claim rests on its inclusion of “inactive voters” – people who have been removed from active rolls ...

“All one need do is look at the posted list, memorize a name and address, repeat it to the poll worker, and receive that person’s ballot, no questions asked,” said the EIP in its press release.

(Washington Times)

U B the lying, cock-sucking queer, M T Brain Socket.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Your own article explains exactly how JW arrived at the number they did, M T Brain Socket, and California law stipulates that any one turning up at the poll using the name of any one of those names on the inactive lists are entitled to vote, you dick-sucking queer ... and the names are posted publicly in the polling place on the day of the election encouraging voter fraud, M T Brain Socket.







U B the lying, cock-sucking queer, M T Brain Socket.

So. if " Juan Gomez " is on the inactive list, reckon MT Fluffer thinks that there will ONLY be ONE " Juan Gomez " voting in that precinct ?

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Your own article explains exactly how JW arrived at the number they did, M T Brain Socket, and California law( You mean all state laws. An inactive voter is someone whom has registered and voted before but missed the last two elections is all you idiot) stipulates that any one turning up at the poll using the name of any one of those names on the inactive lists are entitled to vote, you dick-sucking queer ... and the names are posted publicly in the polling place on the day of the election encouraging voter fraud, M T Brain Socket.







U B the lying, cock-sucking queer, M T Brain Socket.

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

So. if " Juan Gomez " is on the inactive list, reckon MT Fluffer thinks that there will ONLY be ONE " Juan Gomez " voting in that precinct ? Do you even know what an inactive voter is? It is someone that has not voted in two elections is all.

Couple of fucking dotards we have here. You are trying to say because there are "inactive" voters you are correct? When you add the active and inactive you still have less that the eligible you idiots.There would have to be 5 million inactive voters for you to be right.

Dean Logan, the registrar-recorder/county clerk for Los Angeles County, which has about 1.3 million inactive voters, said the lists serve as a voting “fail-safe” for people who have moved and are otherwise eligible to vote. A relative handful of inactive voters showed up last fall, he said.

Judicial Watch, he said, “misrepresents how voting statistics are compiled in California.”

In a statement, Padilla called Judicial Watch’s claims “baseless” and designed to “advance the Trump commission's sham voter fraud agenda.” The threatened lawsuit, he said, “represents the latest in a series of coordinated attacks on the voting rights of American citizens.”

Los Angeles County has the following
Registered voters-5258137
Census eligible-6046750
Secy of State eligible 6237395
Registration rate-84.3%

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Couple of fucking dotards we have here. You are trying to say because there are "inactive" voters you are correct? When you add the active and inactive you still have less that the eligible you idiots.There would have to be 5 million inactive voters for you to be right.

Los Angeles County has the following
Registered voters-5258137
Census eligible-6046750
Secy of State eligible 6237395
Registration rate-84.3%

The LA County Voter Registrar's report to JW says you're a fucking mental retard, M T Brain Socket.

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The LA County Voter Registrar's report to JW says you're a fucking mental retard, M T Brain Socket.

Really? That is all you have to say? You know I am right but too big of an asshole to admit it. I have found the real numbers and you are a fucking lying little bitch.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Really? That is all you have to say? You know I am right but too big of an asshole to admit it. I have found the real numbers and you are a fucking lying little bitch.

Actually, M T Brain Socket, the only thing you've demonstrated in this forum is that you're a stupid, lying queer -- and never "right", you leftist, Marxist son-of-a-bitch.

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Actually, M T Brain Socket, the only thing you've demonstrated in this forum is that you're a stupid, lying queer -- and never "right", you leftist, Marxist son-of-a-bitch.

Okay, show me where my numbers are wrong then. If you are so smart you should be able to prove it instead of riding on an off-handed comment made by a JW stooge.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Okay, show me where my numbers are wrong then. If you are so smart you should be able to prove it instead of riding on an off-handed comment made by a JW stooge.

It's very elementary to see and understand that your numbers don't equal what L.A. officials reported to JW, M T Brain Socket.

[themystic]

Back to the original question. When will IB quit lying?. Evidence has surfaced that he is having mental problems. Please close the tread. We shouldnt pick on the weak and helpless. Let me know if you need anything IB. Im here for you Brother!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by themystic

Back to the original question. When will IB quit lying?. Evidence has surfaced that he is having mental problems. Please close the tread. We shouldnt pick on the weak and helpless. Let me know if you need anything IB. Im here for you Brother!

Go play in the street, mistake.

[bambino]

.