Still No Crime.

[NiceGuy53]

Originally Posted by bamscram

WK'ING : for a fellow club member? Be sure he has paid his dues.

LMAO! This coming from a chicken shit little coward who had to close out his old account and open up a new account under a new handle because he refused to honor his bet with Bambino.

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

LMAO! This coming from a chicken shit little coward who had to close out his old account and open up a new account under a new handle because he refused to honor his bet with Bambino.

Prove it. You can't, just like bambino, just bs daily. Two retards in a pod. It is a tossup which one of you is dumber, president and VP of the dumber by the day club. You show your ass daily. Hoping for a jump?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Which does nothing to change the fact that both these investigations were/are politically motivated. Pure and simple.

You can cry and justify one side or the other but it is a two headed coin. Does not matter how you flip it or which side it lands.

Hildebeest's use of an unsecure server to send and receive classified government information was in each and every instance a crime. Hildebeest's failure to respond as required by law to lawful FOIA requests was in each and every instance a crime. Hildebeest's failure to respond as required by law to lawful subpoenas was in each and every instance a crime. Hildebeest's destruction of government documents was in each and every instance a crime. It matters not that she wasn't prosecuted by a corrupt administration for her crimes, but it is very evident that hildebeest is guilty of committing several crimes.

[NiceGuy53]

Originally Posted by bamscram

Prove it. You can't, just like bambino, just bs daily. Two retards in a pod. It is a tossup which one of you is dumber, president and VP of the dumber by the day club. You show your ass daily. Hoping for a jump?

You prove it every time you post, Retarded Lenny!

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

That is rich coming from you. I told you yesterday in one of my posts to crawl back under your rock and you have since repeated this several times. You also routinely throw the same insults back when you reply to a post. When someone calls you retarded lenny or ekim the chimp , you call them the same thing back in your reply. This has been your mo under your new handle as well as under your old handle. LMAO at what a fucking moron you really are!

If you ore anyone is stupid enough to call me retarded lenny or ekim they deserve to be called the same. There is a plethora of stupid assholes on this forum, retarded lenny. My name is not mike I do not live n Kansas, go fuck yourself.

[NiceGuy53]

Originally Posted by bamscram

If you ore anyone is stupid enough to call me retarded lenny or ekim they deserve to be called the same. There is a plethora of stupid assholes on this forum, retarded lenny. My name is not mike I do not live n Kansas, go fuck yourself.

So, according to what you just told LL, that means you are a child. Thanks for clearing that up.

And for the record, I have never called you Mike. You just outed yourself! Way to go dumbass!

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by bamscram

If you ore anyone is stupid enough to call me retarded lenny or ekim they deserve to be called the same. There is a plethora of stupid assholes on this forum, retarded lenny. My name is not mike I do not live n Kansas, go fuck yourself.

Hey, retarted Mike Lenny eeehbhhhhurrr. Have you heard this?

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

So, according to what you just told LL, that means you are a child. Thanks for clearing that up.

And for the record, I have never called you Mike. You just outed yourself! Way to go dumbass!

Do you have anything else to do besides following me around this forum making stupid comments?
You post like a 10 year old screaming on a school yard.
Your reading comprehension sucks .

[NiceGuy53]

Originally Posted by bamscram

Do you have anything else to do besides following me around this forum making stupid comments?
You post like a 10 year old screaming on a school yard.
Your reading comprehension sucks .

Yeah, when you got nothing else, play the victim card. You little pussy! LMAO!

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Hey, retarted Mike Lenny eeehbhhhhurrr. Have you heard this?

Welcome to the club iffylube, you escaped.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Hildebeest's use of an unsecure server to send and receive classified government information was in each and every instance a crime. Hildebeest's failure to respond as required by law to lawful FOIA requests was in each and every instance a crime. Hildebeest's failure to respond as required by law to lawful subpoenas was in each and every instance a crime. Hildebeest's destruction of government documents was in each and every instance a crime. It matters not that she wasn't prosecuted by a corrupt administration for her crimes, but it is very evident that hildebeest is guilty of committing several crimes.

You can write in bold or bolder, it does not change the fact that it is your opinion. There are other respected legal opinions that do not agree with you. Further more it goes to show that both of these investigations were/are political witch hunts. Trump is correct but a hypocrite as he benefitted from a witch hunt of Clinton. You do realize that is was an investigation about Benghazi, not email servers. It morphed into that and that is wtf Trump and all his supporters are trying to prevent....the exact same thing that happened to Clinton. Which is a investigation that purports to be looking for one objective when in fact it is looking for any and all wrongdoing.

I doubt you agree with the below link but that's ok.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/analy...ry?id=36626499
Even before 2014, however, it seems quite clear that the 2009 language and follow up cables from the State Department indicate she did not adhere to proper protocol. But there is a colossal difference between “wrong,” “improper” or even a regulation violation, and a federal crime.

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

Yeah, when you got nothing else, play the victim card. You little pussy! LMAO!

I rest my case.

[NiceGuy53]

Originally Posted by bamscram

I rest my case.

The only "case" you have, is a case of dumbass!

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by bamscram

Welcome to the club iffylube, you escaped.

eeeehbuhhrrrr, "The Onion"? more FAKE NEWS from 9-1-11, literally!!! http://www.theonion.com/article/circ...-emphasi-21252

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

You can write in bold or bolder, it does not change the fact that it is your opinion. There are other respected legal opinions that do not agree with you. Further more it goes to show that both of these investigations were/are political witch hunts. Trump is correct but a hypocrite as he benefitted from a witch hunt of Clinton. You do realize that is was an investigation about Benghazi, not email servers. It morphed into that and that is wtf Trump and all his supporters are trying to prevent....the exact same thing that happened to Clinton. Which is a investigation that purports to be looking for one objective when in fact it is looking for any and all wrongdoing.

I doubt you agree with the below link but that's ok.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/analy...ry?id=36626499
Even before 2014, however, it seems quite clear that the 2009 language and follow up cables from the State Department indicate she did not adhere to proper protocol. But there is a colossal difference between “wrong,” “improper” or even a regulation violation, and a federal crime.

The Benghazi investigation proved that hildebeest and the administration were both negligent and incompetent; thus, responsible for what happened in Benghazi and that they lied about what happened in Benghazi to cover their political asses. What ABC is euphemistically calling "protocols" is actually U.S. government laws and regulations. And the subpoenas directly ordered hildebeest to surrender all -- 100% -- emails intact without alteration. I spent countless hours being formally instructed on the provisions of AR 380-380 AUTOMATED SYSTEMS SECURITY and enforcing those provisions; so, I know what constitutes a violation of security regulations. Hildebeest violated security regulations after being told she couldn't set up her own server. Furthermore, that hildebeest conspicuously destroyed emails after they were lawfully subpoenaed by Congress and FOIA requests is a crime ... no "ifs", "ands" or "buts".