25 year-old female arrested on same charges hildebeest was guilty of violating

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

MT's socket is corroded!

That's because he lets his rainbow flag-waiving " friends " pee all over it ! MT Fluffer is ALWAYS up for a " golden shower " !!!

[LexusLover]

Why hasn't there been much on the news lately about this little criminal.

[Yssup Rider]

Maybe because Twitler doesn't want to bring more attention to her "crime," and what it revealed about his criminal enterprise.

How fucking stupid are you?

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You'd be the one feasting on shit, M T Brain Socket. You jumped into the fray with both feet challenging the veracity of the OP without reading the article cited in the OP, M T Brain Socket. That bit of ignorance is all on your stupid ass, M T Brain Socket.

You are speaking in third party about a post you made.
Are you having trouble keeping your handle straight?
Seems like all you have is pointless insults and no real reply to my question. I will repeat it. Why did you quote a section that was not complete and gave the implication that they were jumping to conclusions? I am going to assume you were trolling and I was the one that forgot what a cornholer you are. Lesson learned, do not ask IB/LL a question unless you want to hear some bullshit. I guess you enjoy being a troll. I have looked at most of our exchanges and pretty much that is your MO. Find a way to get off topic and ramble on about some bullshit. To each his own. So now that it is obvious that Russia has hacked elections what do you have to say to about the "leaker of truth"?
I bet if she had leaked some Hillary shit you would be kissing her ass.

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Why hasn't there been much on the news lately about this little criminal.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Maybe because Twitler doesn't want to bring more attention to her "crime," and what it revealed about his criminal enterprise.

How fucking stupid are you?

LOL A "criminal that leaked a report about The " CRIMINAL"

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

....no real reply to my question. I will repeat it. Why did you quote a section that was not complete and gave the implication that they were jumping to conclusions?

WOW! Can anyone believe this shit? MT Brain Socket is so fucking stupid that he doesn't even read the OP's link before asking stupid questions that are answered in the link. Then when we refer him to the link, he blames the OP for not quoting everything!

I am flabbergasted that anyone can even think like this. All the asshole needed to do was say "oops, I should've read the link. Thanks for pointing it out. Sorry I wasted everyone's time asking stupid questions!" But of course that would require honesty and integrity - qualities that libtards like MT Brain Cavity don't possess. Their motto is always find a way to blame someone else, never take personal responsibility for your own fuck-ups, even if it makes you look like a complete jackass and a total laughingstock!

MT Fuckhead is the troll here. He's a time-wasting POS. I just wasted 10 minutes of my life pointing it out, which is exactly what the dipshit wants. He gets off on wasting our time and exasperating us. Let's sit back and let Herfacechair keep pounding and obliterating his sorry ass in the condalisa thread. The rest of us should just ignore him.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

LOL A "criminal that leaked a report about The " CRIMINAL"

What goes around comes around!

She'll be passed around on Saturday nights. But she wants it.

My question was rhetorical, but obviously that went over the heads of the two low hanging fruits ... AssWipe and HighPockets.

The media is "respecting her privacy," because otherwise they would be spreading their own Liberal Shit-Stained Panties all over the 24/7 "news" ... The lack of "leaks" about her shows from whom the "leaks" have been coming ... the Liberals!!!! ...

... and Anti-Trumpers like her!

Does anyone want to venture a guess as to whether or not her bunk mate will be another "Liberal Anti-Trumper"?

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by lustylad

WOW! Can anyone believe this shit? MT Brain Socket is so fucking stupid that he doesn't even read the OP's link before asking stupid questions that are answered in the link. Then when we refer him to the link, he blames the OP for not quoting everything!

I am flabbergasted that anyone can even think like this. All the asshole needed to do was say "oops, I should've read the link. Thanks for pointing it out. Sorry I wasted everyone's time asking stupid questions!" But of course that would require honesty and integrity - qualities that libtards like MT Brain Cavity don't possess. Their motto is always find a way to blame someone else, never take personal responsibility for your own fuck-ups, even if it makes you look like a complete jackass and a total laughingstock!

MT Fuckhead is the troll here. He's a time-wasting POS. I just wasted 10 minutes of my life pointing it out, which is exactly what the dipshit wants. He gets off on wasting our time and exasperating us. Let's sit back and let Herfacechair keep pounding and obliterating his sorry ass in the condalisa thread. The rest of us should just ignore him.

Again. I asked about the excerpt that he not I took from the link. I think the issue is you can not explain why he/you omitted the the missing info and are too stupid or ashamed to admit it.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

I think the issue is you can not explain why he/you omitted the the missing info and are too stupid or ashamed to admit it.

Over the past 15 to 20 years I've noticed a trend with Liberals regarding their self-perceived intellectual superiority that manifests in their failed efforts to read others' minds when they "assign" what they "think" others are thinking.

That's one character trait that explains FAKE NEWS!

They don't want to report reality, even if they recognized it, so they are reporting fabricated bullshit that will augment and support their "agenda"!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You are speaking in third party about a post you made.
Are you having trouble keeping your handle straight?
Seems like all you have is pointless insults and no real reply to my question. I will repeat it. Why did you quote a section that was not complete and gave the implication that they were jumping to conclusions? I am going to assume you were trolling and I was the one that forgot what a cornholer you are. Lesson learned, do not ask IB/LL a question unless you want to hear some bullshit. I guess you enjoy being a troll. I have looked at most of our exchanges and pretty much that is your MO. Find a way to get off topic and ramble on about some bullshit. To each his own. So now that it is obvious that Russia has hacked elections what do you have to say to about the "leaker of truth"?
I bet if she had leaked some Hillary shit you would be kissing her ass.

The real question is "Why didn't you read the entire article or fully apprise yourself of the ongoing story in the press before you made a stupid post", M T Brain Socket? BTW, M T Brain Socket, this incident Winner leaked happened on Odumbo's watch ... not hildebeest, but close enough for government work.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by lustylad

WOW! Can anyone believe this shit? MT Brain Socket is so fucking stupid that he doesn't even read the OP's link before asking stupid questions that are answered in the link. Then when we refer him to the link, he blames the OP for not quoting everything!

I am flabbergasted that anyone can even think like this. All the asshole needed to do was say "oops, I should've read the link. Thanks for pointing it out. Sorry I wasted everyone's time asking stupid questions!" But of course that would require honesty and integrity - qualities that libtards like MT Brain Cavity don't possess. Their motto is always find a way to blame someone else, never take personal responsibility for your own fuck-ups, even if it makes you look like a complete jackass and a total laughingstock!

MT Fuckhead is the troll here. He's a time-wasting POS. I just wasted 10 minutes of my life pointing it out, which is exactly what the dipshit wants. He gets off on wasting our time and exasperating us. Let's sit back and let Herfacechair keep pounding and obliterating his sorry ass in the condalisa thread. The rest of us should just ignore him.

And all of those " qualities " are what he and his HERO Lubed Wide Ass share. No wonder MT Fluffer is such a WK for his " vacationing " butt-buddy !

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Over the past 15 to 20 years I've noticed a trend with Liberals regarding their self-perceived intellectual superiority that manifests in their failed efforts to read others' minds when they "assign" what they "think" others are thinking.

That's one character trait that explains FAKE NEWS!

They don't want to report reality, even if they recognized it, so they are reporting fabricated bullshit that will augment and support their "agenda"!

I didn't respond to a fake news story. I asked a question that pertained to a quote IB made. He/Lusty chose to go for the insult reply rather than say. In the link it elaborates a bit further. Even though it is still a bit vague . Your concept of me deciding what someone thinks is sad. We are literally talking about a post where I asked the OP to explain what he meant. remember I did not choose the link and even gave a disclaimer I did not have an opinion one way or the other.

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The real question is "Why didn't you read the entire article or fully apprise yourself of the ongoing story in the press before you made a stupid post", M T Brain Socket? BTW, M T Brain Socket, this incident Winner leaked happened on Odumbo's watch ... not hildebeest, but close enough for government work.

No the real issue is I asked why you chose to post an out of context quote. And you have no idea why you did. Now you think she did it while Obama was in office. You are really a fucking idiot. By the way she plead not guilty. The article only states the agents accusations. It imply's that she admitted to it but look at the sentence structure.

The FBI special agent who wrote the affidavit in support of Winner's arrest alleges that she printed out the document from her work computer on May 9, 2017, and mailed it to a "News Outlet." The outlet then showed the document to the NSA —referred to as "the Government Agency" — in order to confirm its authenticity.

Winner "admitted intentionally identifying and printing the classified intelligence reporting at issue" , and mailing it to the outlet according to the affidavit.

Why are there quote marks around that part of the quote and not in it's entirety?

You know you look like an asshole for acting like a Killdeer bird every chance you get. Even if you would have said in your mind it was compelling enough that would have shown maturity. But to lose your mind over it shows how petty you are. I never said you were stupid or wrong or any type of an insult till you lost your shit. Then I pointed out what kind of a person you are.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by MT Pockets

By the way she plead not guilty. The article only states the agents accusations. It imply's that she admitted to it but look at the sentence structure.

I read "an article" in which it was stated she gave a statement to the Feds admitting to her activities and the facts fit the statutory scheme. She can make an initial plea of not guilty, and that doesn't change a thing. ..."sentence structure" ... ??

[MT Pockets]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I read "an article" in which it was stated she gave a statement to the Feds admitting to her activities and the facts fit the statutory scheme. She can make an initial plea of not guilty, and that doesn't change a thing. ..."sentence structure" ... ??

Look, his excerpt did not have a complete explanation and it also interjected she had email contacted them. It was out of context to the story. Even the whole story has some unusual punctuation. I think she did it but can not find anything that clearly states she admitted to it. I have looked for something that said she admitted to sending it. Would you mind sharing it? He fucked up and posted a dumbass quote out of the blue with no explanation as to why he even did it. Hell he had just posted the article. Why would he pick out that particular section? He has yet to say why he posted it. I thought he was making a point for once. I guess he was just bumping his thread. He is a fucking weird ass dude.