Mueller investigating Trump for obstruction of justice, Washington Post reports

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

If you don't read his Tweets,
You can't have any PUTIN!

How can you have any PUTIN
If you don't read his Tweets?


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!

[Stockinglover]

There is no obstruction by Trump. Just complete bullshit.

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by Stockinglover

There is no obstruction by Trump. Just complete bullshit.

everything the dims do collectively is b.s.

[Guest050619-1]

[Munchmasterman]

Only a fool makes a statement like this without examples to back himself up. And since they've been wrong so often, examples should be easy to find.

So what have you got?

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

You got a more reliable source than the Post? They've been wrong so often only fools take them seriously.

[Munchmasterman]

What were those lies?

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

The real headline should be 'Munchie falls for FAKE NEWS... AGAIN!'

From the Washington Post article (caught in many lies lately)...

"Five people briefed on the interview requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly"
These aren't "anonymous sources". The Post knows exactly who they are and whether or not they are reliable and in a position to know about the information they conveyed to the Post.
And more telling than anything (besides you calling it fake) is the fact Mueller hasn't refuted it.

Anonymous sources = "We made this shit up."

Get back to us when you have a verifiable source.

Why would I "get back to us (you)"? You're nobody. Other than being a liar that is. Your statement, "caught in many lies lately" is a lie.
Unless you can prove it's true, of course.

How can you be a verifiable/reliable authority/judge on what stories are fake or which sources are good when you lie about the accuracy of sources you don't like? That's a rhetorical question by the way.

[Guest050619-1]

The Post is nothing more than toilet paper....who in their right mind takes anything those hacks write seriously?

In time, Bezos will fuck up the newly acquired Whole Foods, too.....that's okay, Trader Joe's and Central Market are much better for what I need anyways....

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

The Post is nothing more than toilet paper....who in their right mind takes anything those hacks write seriously?

In time, Bezos will fuck up the newly acquired Whole Foods, too.....that's okay, Trader Joe's and Central Market are much better for what I need anyways....

Look, when Trump Institutes a state-run newspaper then you will have your reliable Media source.

For now, looks like a few of you will have to rely on Pravda

[Guest123018-4]

This past election cycle told us all we need to know about the media such as the Washington Compost and NYT as well as CNN and MSN. Their credibility has been forever lost. They should try being honest for a change.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

This past election cycle told us all we need to know about the media such as the Washington Compost and NYT as well as CNN and MSN. Their credibility has been forever lost. They should try being honest for a change.

Who is the honest paper of record?

The honest media outlet?

What source is your go to source?

[dilbert firestorm]

Drudge Report

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

It all comes down to the evidence. And if Congress is controlled by Republicans or Americans
Don't forget that if they give up trump, conservatives still have both chambers and the presidency. Imagine it. They could actually pass some legislation.

We gave them BOTH Houses, yet they still didn't get off their fat behinds to do a damn lick of work, continually whining that "but we need the presidency".
WELL now they have it, and what are they doing. FIGHITNG THE presidency that we gave them.
IMO if they boot don, they can kiss goodbye to 80%+ of the conservative support..

Originally Posted by LexusLover

As the head of the executive branch of our government, who is ultimately responsible for budgetary matters and efficient use of resources within the executive branch, the POTUS can make suggestions to "move on" when there is an alleged criminal "investigation" that has been ongoing for almost a year (begun in the prior administration) and NOTHING has been uncovered indicating a crime has been committed.

And righly he should.. BUT imo no matter WHAT trump does, libtards will get their panties in a twist.

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

The real headline should be 'Munchie falls for FAKE NEWS... AGAIN!'

From the Washington Post article (caught in many lies lately)...

"Five people briefed on the interview requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly"

Anonymous sources = "We made this shit up."

Get back to us when you have a verifiable source.

That's why when i see a story lead with "anonymous sources", i immediately block out the rest of it.. THERE'S NO DAMN WAY any sane individual can take it with even a full BOTTLE of salt as truthful..