Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Government documents say what they mean and mean what they say. That's the way most people view the United States Constitution and especially with the second amendment. The same holds true with any document that may adversely affect our Constitutional rights such as the Right To Bear arms shall not be Infringed. There is no question what that phrase means and what it was meant to mean, but recently H.R. 4269 wants to infringe upon that phrase and redefine our constitutional right to bear arms. So there is no question there is something wanting in the minds of Democrats, and that wanting is to alter our 2nd Amendment and for what?
In 1986 former SCJustice Warren Burger explained.
" The very language of the second amendment refutes any argument
that was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any
kind of weapon he or she desires"
The notion that the second amendment preserves as individual right to own a gun
is " one of the greatest pieces of fraud on the American people by
special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime".
In 1986 former SCJustice Warren Burger explained.
" The very language of the second amendment refutes any argument
that was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any
kind of weapon he or she desires"
The notion that the second amendment preserves as individual right to own a gun
is " one of the greatest pieces of fraud on the American people by
special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime".
Well if your State initiates a gun buy back program you go right ahead and toss whatever firearm you have in the box. Don't forget to stop short at the door as you leave so they can stamp "BIG DUMMY" on the back of your head.
Well if your State initiates a gun buy back program you go right ahead and toss whatever firearm you have in the box. Don't forget to stop short at the door as you leave so they can stamp "BIG DUMMY" on the back of your head.
Jim
Wont happen jim, they just passed a law where any retard can carry concealed without getting a permit.
In 1986 former SCJustice Warren Burger explained.
" The very language of the second amendment refutes any argument
that was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any
kind of weapon he or she desires"
The notion that the second amendment preserves as individual right to own a gun
is " one of the greatest pieces of fraud on the American people by
special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime".
eehbbuhhhrrrr the "Independent" reads Huffpo, who would have guessed?
In 1986 former SCJustice Warren Burger explained.
" The very language of the second amendment refutes any argument
that was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any
kind of weapon he or she desires"
The notion that the second amendment preserves as individual right to own a gun
is " one of the greatest pieces of fraud on the American people by
special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime".
The fact that Warren Burger made that statement is exactly why our Founders put the 2d Amendment in our Bill of Rights, i.e., to protect our freedoms from the stupid, naive ramblings of old fools such as he.
In 1986 former SCJustice Warren Burger explained.
" The very language of the second amendment refutes any argument
that was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any
kind of weapon he or she desires"
The notion that the second amendment preserves as individual right to own a gun
is " one of the greatest pieces of fraud on the American people by
special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime".
ok. so i can't own a howitzer. it won't fit in my garage anyway. i'm ok with that. and it's kinda hard to conceal carry.
actually i can own a howitzer. so there!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Well if your State initiates a gun buy back program you go right ahead and toss whatever firearm you have in the box. Don't forget to stop short at the door as you leave so they can stamp "BIG DUMMY" on the back of your head.
Jim
he needs to have "BIG DUMMY" branded on his forehead for all to see. lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Wont happen jim, they just passed a law where any retard can carry concealed without getting a permit.
still pushing that LIE? it's a LIE ya know? the Kansas law you speak about doesn't allow felons to conceal or open carry. and you know it fuckhead.
stop lying.
besides, when did criminals care about laws?
Quote:
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
eehbbuhhhrrrr the "Independent" reads Huffpo, who would have guessed?
Wont happen jim, they just passed a law where any retard can carry concealed without getting a permit.
You should get an adult to explain this to you, eehhbbuhhrrrrr...
Quote:
To an egalitarian, it is crystal clear that there is no ethical basis for any argument that group X may have superior means to defense than group Y, even if group Y are criminals or mentally ill. If they are criminals, then they must remediate the victim (a person or specific people) commensurate to the crime (they owe nothing to anyone else in society or the state). If they are mentally ill, then only those with relations to them should concern themselves with them. Anyone else can take whatever precautions they want, but a 3rd party subjective opinion of someone';s mental or emotional state is no ethical justification for violating equal rights principles. When you understand ethics and put your ego aside, you will see this truth.
You should get an adult to explain this to you, eehhbbuhhrrrrr...
Quote:
To an egalitarian, it is crystal clear that there is no ethical basis for any argument that group X may have superior means to defense than group Y, even if group Y are criminals or mentally ill. If they are criminals, then they must remediate the victim (a person or specific people) commensurate to the crime (they owe nothing to anyone else in society or the state). If they are mentally ill, then only those with relations to them should concern themselves with them. Anyone else can take whatever precautions they want, but a 3rd party subjective opinion of someone';s mental or emotional state is no ethical justification for violating equal rights principles. When you understand ethics and put your ego aside, you will see this truth.
The fact that Warren Burger made that statement is exactly why our Founders put the 2d Amendment in our Bill of Rights, i.e., to protect our freedoms from the stupid, naive ramblings of old fools such as he.