puscpounder - fake review

[5T3V3]

good job hippo! and thank you for protecting us by taking things like that away. I do have one question -is there a punishment for that type of tomfoolery or is it more of a fix the situation slap on the wrist type of offense?

Thank you Caroline for being honest and taking the time to let us know ... you really class up the joint!

[Fancyinheels]

What is the repercussion for flat-out lying about seeing a provider? Does he get a ban?

[CarolineDavenport]

No idea if punishment is in order, so I'll let the purple guy answer that, but I did forward some other information about him that may lead to a ban-cation. I'm not sure if I can/should disclose what that is unless the Hippo tells me it's okay.

Moral of the lesson... if you're going to pull some shady crap on an escort, make sure she's not smarter than you.

[SpiceItUp]

Originally Posted by 5T3V3

good job hippo! and thank you for protecting us by taking things like that away. I do have one question -is there a punishment for that type of tomfoolery or is it more of a fix the situation slap on the wrist type of offense?

Thank you Caroline for being honest and taking the time to let us know ... you really class up the joint!

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

What is the repercussion for flat-out lying about seeing a provider? Does he get a ban?

Contrary to popular belief, bans are actually handed out extremely sparingly and, barring repeat offenders, only for the most heinous of offenses such as outing and the like. For everything else the progressive disciplinary protocols in place handle offenses quite nicely with the goal always being to educate and turn offenders into valuable contributors when at all possible.

According to those protocols a first time offense for a fake review warrants a warning/points and the loss of any premium access credit accumulated.

[idiot savant]

Originally Posted by CarolineDavenport

Moral of the lesson... if you're going to pull some shady crap on an escort, make sure she's not smarter than you.

Ha. 90% of the posters on this site would fail on that statement alone.

I have to admit - I thought about your questions. I don't remember the color of your couch. And, I don't remember completely what you played music on. I do remember it was Jack Johnson though...

My mind is feeble.

[Fancyinheels]

You're kidding me! Posting a fake review is not a ban-worthy offense, not even for a week?

It puts other providers in danger if they use reviews as part of screening; it can jeopardize a provider's reputation depending on what's written; it can falsely list services she doesn't offer at a rate nowhere close to her actual donation; and it's outright dishonest and misleading.

Plus, the guy was patently trying to put one over on ECCIE and "steal" 6 weeks' worth of BCD access he wasn't entitled to.

Taking it down is nice, but this certainly deserves more than a slap on the wrist.

Sorry, I'm a mellow Irish lassie, but not giving him at least a few days off is a big, steaming, stinky load of chihuahua crap.

Caroline, thanks for following up and taking this all the way. Very commendable. Other providers have protested fake reviews before with no success.

Ladies, take note for the future:
ANYTHING this puscpounder has said or will say from now on must be called into question.

[Don T. Lukbak]

You're right, Fancy. And if that handle is ever allowed to return, it should be with an indelible scarlet "FAKE REVIEWER" affixed. None of his other 6 previous reviews should be considered credible.

The truth, I suspect, is that a significant number of the reviews on ECCIE are phonies, the site owner enjoys the clicks they provide, and motivation to reduce or eliminate them is slight. Added to that, I don't think very many of the girls give a popcorn fart if they got a phony review, so long as it's a YES.

[Fancyinheels]

Now, if someone wants to write a review of me claiming I'm Caroline's body double, I might not protest that.

You can always blame it on vast, brain-cell-killing quantities of Jameson.

[CarolineDavenport]

Don't worry, Fancy. It seems both of his handles have been banned. It may not be because of the fake review, but the end result is the same.

His other handle was: me chupo bien

In case anyone wanted to know the other handle that can't be trusted.

[boardman]

Damn, and to thinck I fapped to it this morning...

[Guest082824]

Originally Posted by CarolineDavenport

Moral of the lesson... if you're going to pull some shady crap on an escort, make sure she's not smarter than you.

[Pistolero]

Originally Posted by Don T. Lukbak

the site owner enjoys the clicks they provide, and motivation to reduce or eliminate them is slight. .

Having been an Eccie mod now for several years, let me say this. I have never heard or seen anything from the site ownership regarding clicks. I am sure they like them, of course. But, there has never been anything I have seen in mod forums which advised against doing something because it would slow down clicks. Guidelines are guidelines, no matter what or where they lead us to.

[pyramider]

Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Sorry, I'm a mellow Irish lassie, but not giving him at least a few days off is a big, steaming, stinky load of chihuahua crap.

Holy Tebow, what are you feeding those future burritos?

[Guest021817-2]

^^^^^

You know the answer to that.... Taco Bell .

[Don T. Lukbak]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

Having been an Eccie mod now for several years, let me say this. I have never heard or seen anything from the site ownership regarding clicks. I am sure they like them, of course. But, there has never been anything I have seen in mod forums which advised against doing something because it would slow down clicks. Guidelines are guidelines, no matter what or where they lead us to.

Thanks for the reply. Not to be argumentative, it's difficult to imagine a rule that overtly excuses bogus reviews, but it's easy to imagine the lack of prescribed shmb extreme sanctions for them as de facto, nudge and wink acceptance.

Or maybe I'm paranoid.

Hell, I know I'm paranoid but they could both be true.