cbj or bbbj?

[Pounder]

Just curious on everyone's thoughts on this topic. Of course we all want to play safe but it is extremely hard to turn down a bbbj when offered If you make the mistake of googling the risks they make it sound like it's just a risky as unprotected full sex..... I just don't see it being that way. What is everyone's thoughts on this?

[anon103]

Safety-wise cbj is smarter, but I really don't care for them. Pretty much always on the prowl for a good BBBJ myself. I don't see girls who run $40-60 specials. I prefer ladies who provide quality sessions and serve lower volume of clientele. Never have to turn down a BBBJ, heck since I'm single I don't turn down BBFS when offered. I wouldn't trust a high volume provider to do this with though.

[Dunnigan]

For me, it depends on the provider. I had a CBJ once at an AMP that was so good I had no idea I was covered. But a CBJ also accounts for my worst experience. I've had a couple of so-so BBBJs, but never a "bad" one. As far as risks, you'll see strong arguments on both sides. My conclusion is that it's very low risk if you're dealing with quality providers.

[JustCause]

Originally Posted by anon103

...since I'm single I don't turn down BBFS when offered... .

What is the difference in being safe for a SO at home and being safe for the next provider on your list who is also willing to BB?

[anon103]

Originally Posted by JustCause

What is the difference in being safe for a SO at home and being safe for the next provider on your list who is also willing to BB?

Fair question. I suppose I also view myself as a low volume client. If at some point I did catch something I would know when and where it came from. When I have allowed BBFS I have given myself a grace period to verify everything is good to go. I get tested annually, which is above and beyond what most mongers do to insure they are clean.

Biggest difference is that I'm a heck of a lot less likely to get sued by a provider than a begrudged spouse. Not gonna go into morality discussion, financial is how I look at it.

[drsmooth1]

I think whether or not to munch on pussy is a more pertinent question, being that at minimum 8 outta 10 low volume, high volume, low quality, high quality, budget, high dollar, whatever term you wanna use is fucking someone/someones bare back. So if I'm gonna pay for a girls time, I most definitely want a bbbj if it's on her menu!!!

[rrabbit6926]

Put me down for 2 BBBJ vs 1 CBJ. When I started out in the hobby and was nervous yeah a CBJ would do but once you have had a good BBBJ there is just no turning back especially if you get to CIM. Just no substitute.

[Pounder]

Originally Posted by rrabbit6926

Put me down for 2 BBBJ vs 1 CBJ. When I started out in the hobby and was nervous yeah a CBJ would do but once you have had a good BBBJ there is just no turning back especially if you get to CIM. Just no substitute.

That's kind of my thoughts.....I was just wondering what everyone else in the hobby world was thinking on this subject. Like I said we all want to play safe but I don't know anyone yet that has caught anything from a bbbj.......yet , but webmd will make you think it's practically a death sentence smh

[gimme_that]

Well let's ask ourselves this......just for shits and giggles.

Would you knowingly get a CBJ from a provider who has HIV? Do you put that much assurance into a cover?

Would you knowingly receive a BBBJ from a provider who has HIV? Would you still put your hat on the transmission rates being less of an issue because its oral versus vaginal?

[Dunnigan]

Web MD makes a shitload of money preying on people's fears. Their advertisers and sponsors count on it. The risk isn't zero, but HIV transmission from oral is pretty low.