PT as a term

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

I'm thincking that Somebody is about ready to start issuing infractions for non compliance.

crap, CC stated I be non conformist or something like that.
you better not sell him a copy of perry's or your book
or I will be toast if he understood me better sir

CC(not clam) any other guidelines you want me to start a thread for.
I rather skip highjacking as I got 2 pages mostly of that infraction

btw: you seeing less of this topic going on? Just ask ya CC

[Doove]

Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Here are the facts, when you and everyone else joined this site, you had to click that little button saying that you agreed to follow the rules of the site. And obviously you did or you wouldn't be here now. You knew these rules at that point, up front, before you ever made you first post on this website. So if there is now a problem with you following them. If you cannot or don't want to play by the rules anymore, just let me know. There are always alternatives. No one is trying to be difficult and stifle discussion, but thats the way it is on this topic, take it or leave it.

Oh brother. Do we really need to have this discussion again?

I'm all for a zero tolerance policy with respect to discussions involving illegal substances - to the extent that i've always found it absurd allowing people to use the "PT" end-around. But there's nothing in the TOS with respect to either conversations involving illegal substances, or following the rules of the site beyond what's laid out in the TOS.

Either read the damn thing, or stop telling people they agreed to something they didn't agree to when they clicked the box.

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by Doove

Oh brother. Do we really need to have this discussion again?

I'm all for a zero tolerance policy with respect to discussions involving illegal substances - to the extent that i've always found it absurd allowing people to use the "PT" end-around. But there's nothing in the TOS with respect to either conversations involving illegal substances, or following the rules of the site beyond what's laid out in the TOS.

Either read the damn thing, or stop telling people they agreed to something they didn't agree to when they clicked the box.

1. The Web Site is protected by copyright as a collective work and/or compilation, pursuant to U.S. copyright laws, international conventions, and other copyright laws. The contents of the Web Site are only for your personal, non-commercial use. All materials contained on the Web Site are protected by copyright, and are owned or controlled by Company.You will abide by any and all additional copyright notices, information, or restrictions contained in any Content on the Web Site. Copying or storing of any Content for other than personal, noncommercial use is expressly prohibited without the prior written permission from Company.

eh

[Doove]

I'm no lawyer, OSD, but given the content of the 4 sentences immediately prior to and succeeding your highlighted sentence, i think it's safe to say the sentence in red is simply related to copyrights.

You will abide by any and all additional copyright notices, (copyright) information, or (copyright) restrictions contained in any Content on the Web Site (such as ads).

[dearhunter]

If I were a lawyer, I would tell you "restrictions and content" includes the guidelines..........but, I'm not a lawyer........So, I'll let you figure that out for yourself.

[Amber Does]

Originally Posted by drluv1

Not my job either( excuse #1 in the mod rolodex of excuses). Of the 900 people who viewed that thread nobody else bothered to RTM either. I think that speaks volumes about the concern for the policy by members. Given how important the policy seems to be to the powers that be, such lax monitoring makes the policy a joke. If a provider is a raging alcoholic, that's one of the things I'd want to know to base my decision on whether to see her or not. This policy is a disservice to members and potentially puts them at considerably more risk than if a provider was an alcoholic. Do you find it acceptable that there are different standards of enforcement depending on the Mod or region?

^ this guy :-)

[Chica Chaser]

Originally Posted by Wakeup

I disagree with Chica about mentioning that a provider is an alcoholic. Alcoholism is a medical condition, and for me, that falls into medical speculation about a member. Talking about her drinking, or being drunk, is fine, saying she's an alcoholic, isn't, and that's how I'd enforce it. Just me though.

There is certainly different enforcement of certain guidelines in different forums, because some guidelines are open to interpretation. Some are not, and if there is differing enforcement of those guidelines, then the owners and admins put a stop to it...as you are seeing in these forums...

Have fun with that...

As you know, its a fine interpretation line

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

btw: you seeing less of this topic going on? Just ask ya CC

You can see it just as well as I can, and can answer your own question

Originally Posted by Doove

Oh brother. Do we really need to have this discussion again?

I'm all for a zero tolerance policy with respect to discussions involving illegal substances - to the extent that i've always found it absurd allowing people to use the "PT" end-around. But there's nothing in the TOS with respect to either conversations involving illegal substances, or following the rules of the site beyond what's laid out in the TOS.

Either read the damn thing, or stop telling people they agreed to something they didn't agree to when they clicked the box.

Originally Posted by dearhunter

If I were a lawyer, I would tell you "restrictions and content" includes the guidelines..........but, I'm not a lawyer........So, I'll let you figure that out for yourself.

Ah Doove......sigh. I fear you just refuse to get it. That's cool though, its your choice.

[dearhunter]

If you can show me another city forum with the same blatant disregard for GL 15, I am sure modtardville will address it.

[Guest070916]

Originally Posted by Wakeup

I disagree with Chica about mentioning that a provider is an alcoholic. Alcoholism is a medical condition, and for me, that falls into medical speculation about a member. Talking about her drinking, or being drunk, is fine, saying she's an alcoholic, isn't, and that's how I'd enforce it.

Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

As you know, its a fine interpretation line.

Eureka....there is light at the end of the tunnel!....

It appears this is the best way to warn others of problems encountered during a risky date.
Just say the SP was drinking and stumbled about drunk, to cover both drinking, along with any Rule 15 shit!.....

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by Celso

Eureka....there is light at the end of the tunnel!....

It appears this is the best way to warn others of problems encountered during a risky date.
Just say the SP was drinking and stumbled about drunk, to cover both drinking, along with any Rule 15 shit!.....

dang, where is my rock collection. One seems to be missing
or
TOFTT and try it first

[Guest070916]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

TOFTT and try it first

What could go wrong?.....

[Doove]

Originally Posted by dearhunter

If I were a lawyer, I would tell you "restrictions and content" includes the guidelines

The entire clause is about copyrights.....except for one-half of one sentence right in the middle of it. If you say so.

but, I'm not a lawyer

Clearly.

Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Ah Doove......sigh. I fear you just refuse to get it. That's cool though, its your choice.

No, Ccamouflage, what i refuse to do is accept something just because you say so. That went out the window back with your little power play back in August.

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by Doove

The entire clause is about copyrights.....except for one-half of one sentence right in the middle of it. If you say so.

Clearly.



No, Ccamouflage, what i refuse to do is accept something just because you say so. That went out the window back with your little power play back in August.

heh

[Guest042416]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

heh

[dearhunter]

Originally Posted by Doove

The entire clause is about copyrights......

You can disagree as you comply............I've been there