Kandi and multiple phone numbers

[ElumEno]

Originally Posted by Mizzou82

...a guy with 1,700+ posts and no reviews is not qualified to lecture anyone on what information is good, what is censorship, and how information is good for the community, Because you see, other than building yourself up by tearing others down, you provide no information at all

So what about a guy that has 5,822 post and zero reviews... would he also not be qualified to know what information is good on this SHMB?


Talk about being illogical... some get it and some never will.

[Guest090920]

Stated by Mizzou82 "Here we go again. And a guy with 1,700+ posts and no reviews is not qualified to lecture anyone on what information is good, what is censorship, and how information is good for the community...."

Is this another of your new rules for this SHMB? Did you hear that guys, Mizzou82 will now be rating and grading the information each of you contributes to these various discussions.

Information comes in several forms and types, my still-acting-like-a-newbie colleague, not just in reviews. I thought you had learned that by reading and participating in the various discussions on this SHMB, but clearly you haven't.

Your debating skills are still wanting, so it is probably best that you use your favorite line, "I am done."

[jackson842]

Originally Posted by froggy69

Met at neutral location and realized why she didn't post pictures W her ad, she's is VERY VERY unattractive and what she is asking for $ wise stay far away

Why not post the BP link so we know exactly who/what you are talking about...not very helpful as usual...

[malwoody]

Originally Posted by malwoody

Seriously not trying to cause anything here but really?, why the private tags? There are folks here without PA who could benefit from your post...especially newbies..
Kinda like the one who started this thread..

Originally Posted by Mizzou82

I posted it private because I felt the original post and my quick reply should have been in a member only area. If non premium members can not see it then, doesn't change the fact that is a topic best suited for a member only area of the board. This is "coed discussion board" What purpose did calling someone unattractive to this audience serve? Does it serve the providers on ECCIE to know that a BP girl with no pic was called "very, very, unattractive"?

Like I stated previously and respectfully I might add, I thought the info you put in private could benefit the non-PA members as well but I guess you think you should hide it from anyone who is not a "member"? Care to define "member"? I wonder if you make it a habit to exclude folks in RL as well?

Originally Posted by Mizzou82

Stay tuned for more illogical and unrelated posts form MW and Scorp

Once again I believe your post in private has value and could benefit the entire forum and not just a "member only area of the board". I find it unfortunate that you would characterize my comment as "illogical and unrelated" when I was merely saying that I thought your post had value.
Quite frankly, it does not make any sense to me but then again, maybe the fact that I think we are all in this together and to help one another differs from your point of view.