Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163231
Yssup Rider60927
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48646
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42577
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid37003
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-04-2014, 06:04 PM   #16
Submodo
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 4, 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 441
Encounters: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Serious question, Sub. How do you do that? Is it primarily automation and technology? Some industries certainly benefit from that, but is it across the board?
Do you see society heading in this direction, Sub?
Roughly 50% automation/technology (for larger firms mostly), and 50% internal process/procedure improvements or outsourcing to cheaper providers.

I definitely see the U.S. heading for that kind of mess. My question to our great leaders is always "what do we do with all these people?"

My belief is in 50 or so years the US will be under some sort of Communist/Fascist government, and it will not be by hostile takeover. Eventually enough people will be so disenfranchised for so long that they will en masse be willing to vote in that kind of system.
Submodo is offline   Quote
Old 01-04-2014, 09:02 PM   #17
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Submodo View Post
Roughly 50% automation/technology (for larger firms mostly), and 50% internal process/procedure improvements or outsourcing to cheaper providers.

I definitely see the U.S. heading for that kind of mess. My question to our great leaders is always "what do we do with all these people?"

My belief is in 50 or so years the US will be under some sort of Communist/Fascist government, and it will not be by hostile takeover. Eventually enough people will be so disenfranchised for so long that they will en masse be willing to vote in that kind of system.
A while back, The Discovery Channel was running their series on modern Factories. They were in a huge Automobile Manufacturing Facility, where the host and guest were just marveling at all of the automated machinery, robots were doing just about everything from painting to assembly.

The problem? No people. Literally. None.

Who buys the cars?
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 01-04-2014, 09:07 PM   #18
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Submodo View Post
Roughly 50% automation/technology (for larger firms mostly), and 50% internal process/procedure improvements or outsourcing to cheaper providers.

I definitely see the U.S. heading for that kind of mess. My question to our great leaders is always "what do we do with all these people?"

My belief is in 50 or so years the US will be under some sort of Communist/Fascist government, and it will not be by hostile takeover. Eventually enough people will be so disenfranchised for so long that they will en masse be willing to vote in that kind of system.

Watch the movie Harrison Bergeron. It is on youtube. It tells of a dystopian future where only 10% of Americans work while the rest were replaced by automation. That vast majority get their revenge.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 12:04 AM   #19
blue3122
Valued Poster
 
blue3122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 278
Encounters: 6
Default

I just returned from 7 months in Oregon on a project. They had an $8.95 minimum wage that is now $9.10. That also applies to tipped workers like waitstaff in restaurants and strippers. (Not kidding, look it up.)
Here are the effects that I observed and then confirmed by talking to owners of businesses.

Restaurants. Servers and bartenders make that minimum wage. In most states, there is something called a "tip credit" that allows employers to pay tipped employees about $2.30 (I am guessing based on what I was told) per hour. I know in Colorado, the tipped employees get about $3.00 an hour. The tip credit recognizes they get tips as part of their pay. So, the result is that the owners of restaurants have employees who are marginally skilled, making $9 per hour. One restaurant owner told me that his premium 1/2 pound hamburger costs $1.50 more than the same one in Colorado due to wage costs . (Kitchen wages are also the same, which is higher than minimum). The results are that he keeps the minium number of servers and bartenders on. Customers get crappy service and pay about 20% more for the products than they should. He wants to sell and move to Colorado or some other state. He makes money but less each year as fewer people eat out due to the higher cost/poor service. The owner I spent some time with told me a restaurant (8000 sf, seats about 175) in Colorado would employ about 30 people. He employs less than 20. The effect on employment is to decrease jobs.

Another great Oregon thing is that it is illegal for you to pump your own gas. (not kidding, look it up) Oregon and New Jersey have to have a licensed person pump your gas. The results are predictable. Fewer gas stations. Lines to get gas. Adjusting for state taxes, Oregon gas is about 15 cents per gallon higher than the surrounding states.

Beautiful state, but complete lack of understanding of economics.
blue3122 is offline   Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 12:22 AM   #20
FU_CC
BANNED
 
FU_CC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 17, 2013
Location: F = fun
Posts: 199
Default

is that a math question?
FU_CC is offline   Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 12:24 AM   #21
Sidewinder
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 1,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
How Much Would A Big Mac Cost If McDonald's Workers Were Paid $15 Per Hour?

The cost of a Big Mac–at least to consumers–probably wouldn’t go up at all. Why? In order to remain competitive with rivals on price, the company,as economist Adam Ozimek pointed out earlier this week, would probably find a way to keep overall labor costs in check, most likely by reducing the number of workers and introducing more automation–think ATMs in the banking industry....

Dr. Bittlingmayer described discussions on fast food wages as a symptom of a larger problem: the U.S. school system. “Low wages for adults are a sign that something didn’t go right in terms of education and work experience,” he said. “We’re not addressing the cause.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoco...d-15-per-hour/
The usual rule of thumb is that "overhead" on an employee costs about 100% of salary. This means that a $7.50/hour guy actually costs the business about $15/hour.

With nominally 2000 working hours in a year, a $15/hour employee working full-time costs the employer about $60,000/year. Times five years, that's $300,000. If you can replace one full-time-equivalent person with a robot that costs only $250,000, and lasts five years, you've made money on the deal. If, over the 5-year service life of the robot, you spend less than $50,000 on maintenance, you've broken even - AND you don't have to worry about the robot going out on strike for even higher wages.

If you can replace four FTEs with one robot, with a five-year service life, you can make money even if you spend a million dollars on each robot.

The question then becomes: Could you do it? The answer is Yes, quite easily. As of quite a few years ago, the typical McDonald's was a counterpoint chorus of beeps and boops, as various computers notified the human pick-and-place robots that it was time to, for example, pull the fry baskets out of the grease, or flip the burgers on the grill, or load the finished patties into the assembly line bins, or assemble another order. Humans were already being used as relatively simple industrial robots, and the state of the art in industrial robotics has improved a LOT since then.
Sidewinder is offline   Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 02:59 AM   #22
Chica Chaser
Premium Access
 
Chica Chaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Mesaba
Posts: 31,149
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue3122 View Post
Beautiful state, but complete lack of understanding of economics.
And look how they vote every time
Chica Chaser is offline   Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 02:40 PM   #23
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue3122 View Post
...

Restaurants. Servers and bartenders make that minimum wage......
......
In Houston, you can't walk into any restaurant without finding illegals working in the kitchen. I'm curious if the same situ occurs in Oregon.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 03:20 PM   #24
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue3122 View Post
I just returned from 7 months in Oregon on a project.
Oregon has an income tax also ... so a lot of people who work in Portland live in Washington state, buy their gas in Washington ... but buy their groceries and household stuff in Oregon where there has not been a sales tax, which Washington state has.

The "pitch" on the no self-serve in Oregon was to "protect the environment" by not "spilling any gasoline while fueling."
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 09:28 AM   #25
Texas Contrarian
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2009
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,327
Default Sorry to be so late to this thread, but...

...I believe there are some interesting points to be made here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Submodo View Post
"Corporations want to make money and the more product sold, the more workers needed to make the product that creates the profit."

Good dissertation up till there. True in 1914. Not true in 2014.

I've been making a pretty good living for the past decade helping firms sell more product/service while employing fewer and fewer people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Serious question, Sub. How do you do that? Is it primarily automation and technology? Some industries certainly benefit from that, but is it across the board?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submodo View Post
Roughly 50% automation/technology (for larger firms mostly), and 50% internal process/procedure improvements or outsourcing to cheaper providers.

I definitely see the U.S. heading for that kind of mess. My question to our great leaders is always "what do we do with all these people?"

My belief is in 50 or so years the US will be under some sort of Communist/Fascist government, and it will not be by hostile takeover. Eventually enough people will be so disenfranchised for so long that they will en masse be willing to vote in that kind of system.
In a similar vein, Tyler Cowen, one of the economics professoriate's more imaginative thinkers (there are all too few!), has written extensively on issues at least peripherally relating to this very concern. His essential point is that the top 10-15% of the intelligence, skills, and educational attainment distribution will do pretty well in the coming years, while the rest of the population will have a rather tough time. We may be in for a long, chaotic ride while those engaged in the political process try to ingratiate themselves with the electorate.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-machines.html

http://www.npr.org/2013/09/12/221425...only-get-worse

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/...-occupy-wrong/

http://blogs.hbr.org/2013/12/algorit...-what-they-do/

From the same post as his earlier quote snippet:

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Interesting. Would make a good thread on its own. Do you see society heading in this direction, Sub?
Indeed, discussion of the consequences likely to result from all these structural transformations of the economy probably would make a good thread. In fact, I considered starting one after reading about some of Cowen's work, but felt that these points dovetailed nicely with the discussion in this already existing thread, so there was no need at this point to start another. In fact, I think this topic is closely associated with all the wrangling over the statutory minimum wage, and serves to point up the fact that the latter is mostly about winning political battles and does little to address the crux of the problem.
Texas Contrarian is online now   Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 09:39 AM   #26
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

True.....that is why the political objective should be to unwind the Federal Leviathan...........simply tinkering around the edges is muddling and will fail.

Return the power to the individual statehouses !


Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainMidnight View Post
...I believe there are some interesting points to be made here.

In a similar vein, Tyler Cowen, one of the economics professoriate's more imaginative thinkers (there are all too few!), has written e....while the rest of the population will have a rather tough time. We may be in for a long, chaotic ride while those engaged in the political process try to ingratiate themselves to the electorate.

....
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 09:56 AM   #27
Texas Contrarian
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2009
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,327
Default Good luck with that!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
True.....that is why the political objective should be to unwind the Federal Leviathan...........simply tinkering around the edges is muddling and will fail.

Return the power to the individual statehouses !
I'm certainly on board with the notion of limiting the size and scope of the federal government.

But when those controlling the power levers in the White House (any White House, not just this one), the House, or the Senate seem to be demonstrably loosening their grips on said levers, someone please let us know!

(Thus it should be obvious to even the most poorly informed observer that whatever he may think the political objective should be and what it will be are two altogether different things.)
Texas Contrarian is online now   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved