Questionable review

[pocRODMAN]

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1054528414

The above link is to a review and my response.
You will see my concerns and reasons for my calling it a bogus review.
I did a provider search for Lady V for my information and was led to a far different provider than is described. I did a search among SA providers and came up with someone who might be the Lady V described.
Either way, the 'review' has virtually no details.
It smells like BS to me, perhaps a self review.

Hope this does not meet with your displeasure, but BS is BS, and I think that something is wrong about this, either from the woman who posed as Lady V or the writer, or both. It may be one and the same.

Or I may have awakened on the wrong side of the bed ...

Any feedback from the mods is welcome.
Others can hold your peace.

[Mokoa]

At this time there is no way to definitively establish any nefarious intent.

[pocRODMAN]

Part of the problem is the reviewer posted the provider as Lady V.
The real LadyV PM'd me.
So the confusion might have been avoided had I done a more thorough search, BUT the reviewer should have gotten her name correct. My search of "Lady V" came up with the other provider I mentioned in my review-reply. Keeping it real and owning it. Just saying ...

Apparently no ill intent ... Just poor reviewing, IMNSHO.

Thanks for your reply.

I suggest the thread be closed.

[Guest081519]

Closed as requested by the OP.