Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
You don't know why the police crossed the street; the cops likely had a legitimate reason to take the kid down to the ground.....
But you assume otherwise.................
I suspect they could have easily arrested him the first time for public intoxication; but they were being decent cops and let the asshole go....he walked across the street and mouthed off to them.....maybe he said "you fucking idiot cops didn't even search me; for all you know I could've be carrying a concealed gun and shot you fuckers"....who knows what he yelled....the cops pursued, ordered him to comply, he didn't, canine showed up, the suspect was subdued and cuffed.
Appropriate use of force.
Now the ambulance chasers smell money $$$$$$$$$$$............and the taxpayers of AC will foot the bill.......the kid was an asshole in the wrong............but the American litigation lobby system will fuck the taxpayer.
|
Making shit up AGAIN.
Where does it say he was intoxicated? He was thrown out of the casino for being 20 instead of 21.
The start of the video is edited and shortened, so I can't say they did a pat-down.
But, even in the short clip, he put his hands behind his back so they can look for bulges in his shirt of waist band. They were probably satisfied there were no gun bulges under his shirt/pants. That only left his pockets, which is why they had him turn them out.
So I will repeat what I said before - they knew he wasn't armed.
Do you know how else I know that?
When they came after him and when they were fighting with him, NOT A SINGLE COP PULLED HIS GUN - not even as a precaution. With an unknown suspect who is fighting, at least one cop always draw his/her weapon.
You wrote: "
the cops pursued, ordered him to comply, he didn't, canine showed up, the suspect was subdued and cuffed".
Pursued? Really? When exactly did he run? He was STANDING on the street yelling at the cops. Believe it or not, in this country, you have the RIGHT to talk back to "the man".
You also omitted saying that he was already pretty much subdued BEFORE the canine showed up. A few more seconds and they would have had the cuffs on him.
And, oh yeah, there was no report that he threatened the cops. That is more shit you made up.
You can bet you last dollar that if he had threatened them, the police chief would not have been withholding comment pending the investigation. He would have reported that the suspect threatened the officers and they then tried to arrest him. But he didn't say that, did he? At the very least, the police report would have stated that he threatened the cops. But there was no statement about that either.
This statement of yours encapsulates the whole incident: ".
..he walked across the street and mouthed off to them..."
Yep, that is the ONLY relevant thing you said. He got beaten up for mouthing off. And the cops should be fired.