Really..

[malwoody]

I wonder if the Mod who closed VKs thread is the same one who pointed SOTF..?

I've seen more closed threads in the last couple of weeks than I think I have seen the whole time I have been on this board. For fucks sake, let them hash it out here in the open..I mean are we getting that fucking retentive.. They're grown women..not children that need to be shooed outside to play..

What's wrong with letting them have their say?

[CryptKicker]

Hmm-- I wonder if one of the other mods in KC closed the original thread that SOTF posted. Why yes... Modda did do that.

[JS42]

And then you came along to close VKs' thread...not cool.

[malwoody]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Hmm-- I wonder if one of the other mods in KC closed the original thread that SOTF posted. Why yes... Modda did do that.

Yeah..I got that about Modda..so you awarded points and shut down VKs thread..I wondered who did and now I have my answer..

Next Question..Why shut down the most recent thread, why not just let them air their thoughts..? Whatever happened to a free and open forum?

[Guest090920]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Hmm-- I wonder if one of the other mods in KC closed the original thread that SOTF posted. Why yes... Modda did do that.

Stop whining! You asked for the job or more accurately, probably begged for it. If you can't stand the criticism, turn in your resignation. No one here will be upset.

[Guest102513-1]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Hmm-- I wonder if one of the other mods in KC closed the original thread that SOTF posted. Why yes... Modda did do that.

Ok, let's play that game...Modda shut the thread down

But were points handed out for disclosing personal info???

Were points handed out for disrespect??

Were points handed out for nuclear items???

And exactly who was possibly handing out points?

And who made the decision to make that thread disappear???

My guess is, it wasn't Modda

And with the re-opening of the "that thread"...I don't remember seeing anything really changed...even after it disappeared for awhile.

And yea, yea...the disclosing of who gave what points to whom is not permitted. IMO, it also is a great way to hide behind the secret wall of...well enough of that

I mean, come on...we are all adults. As there is an Eccie guideline about not disrespecting other members postings. How about a guideline
about Mods not showing general disrespect to the members overall intelligence...such as the above quoted post could be very easily interpetted????

[pheonix63]

Hell is going to freeze over, the polar ice caps are going to melt, and I am about to have a heart attack because for once I agree with MW. I have read through the others and the thought crossed my mind that once the org. thread was closed and it spilled into the next one that they had not had their say because it showed up again. VK +100 as to what you said in the first one. I have no cat in this fight because I have not seen any of them and after seeing all of this, well let's just put it this way, I think I would rather have relations with a meat grinder than any of them. To the mods, if they want to put it out there in public let them. With things like this it paints a clear picture as to who they are and what we might not get to see from someone's review of them. As VK said with his I will probably catch hell for it but hey it is being thought of by others as well.

[Doc Savage]

I tend to believe that threads tend to burn them selves out. As long as there are not accusations of pedophilia, or an announcement that an assasin has been hired, I think the mods should keep their hands off. Seeing that we are all adults, we can make a choice weather to continue to read it or add to it.

[offshoredrilling]

errrrr just trying to get this thread about closing a thread that was about closing a thread to catch up to the other thread about closing a thread that was about closing a thread. errrr or something like that.

[JS42]

Originally Posted by Doc Savage

I tend to believe that threads tend to burn them selves out. As long as there are not accusations of pedophilia, or an announcement that an assasin has been hired, I think the mods should keep their hands off. Seeing that we are all adults, we can make a choice weather to continue to read it or add to it.

That use to be the policy around here. Not anymore under current management. On top of that, I have yet to see the top dog moderator admit any wrongdoing or corrections of anything he has done. It's simply beneath him to do such things.

[pyramider]

Just read the rules and post within the rules, the stafftards really cannot do much at that point ... plus it makes their jobs a bit easier.. The rules are posted around here somewhere ... I keep telling them if they have taint pics mixed in more people will read the rules.

[Johnny4455]

Did someone say taint pics??? Where??

[offshoredrilling]

Forum Guidelines for taint