Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70825
biomed163710
Yssup Rider61280
gman4453363
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48824
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37418
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-08-2011, 12:59 AM   #1
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default With Friends Like Us . . .

I'll bet the Israelis are sleeping well tonight, knowing they can count on President Obama.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...145266,00.html

Oh, well. I'm anti-war anyway.

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 06:59 AM   #2
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default I Love THat Last Line

"the journalist are subjected to precise rules of conduct".

This is a joke, right.

What it really means is the media will only report that which is in line with their agenda. I suspect that if this would have been George W Bush making such a gaffe, their "precise rules of conduct" would have been thrown right out the window.

Of course, Our President will now have to deal with Isreal Leaders who know he is not their friend. They know that a person's true character is revealed by their actions when they do not think anybody is watching.

Oh, by the way. Just think "Florida" and all of it's electorial votes in 2012. Wouldn't it be something if the entire Presidential Election of 2012 came down to a off the cuff gaffe made "when he didn't think anybody was listening".
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 09:06 AM   #3
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Nations do not have 'friends', they have allies and that changes depending on Realpolitik.

You two sound like a couple of liberals that worry about feelings. Who gives a fuc what another nation's head thinks of us. It always comes down to Realpolitik.


Examples of US Realpolitik
The policy of Realpolitik was formally introduced to the Richard Nixon White House by Henry Kissinger.[3] In this context, the policy meant dealing with other powerful nations in a practical manner rather than on the basis of political doctrine or ethics—for instance, Nixon's diplomacy with the People's Republic of China, despite the U.S.'s opposition to communism and the previous doctrine of containment. Another example is Kissinger's use of shuttle diplomacy after the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, where he persuaded the Israelis to withdraw partially from the Sinai in deference to the political realities created by the oil crisis.
Realpolitik is distinct from ideological politics in that it is not dictated by a fixed set of rules, but instead tends to be goal-oriented, limited only by practical exigencies. Since realpolitik is ordered toward the most practical means of securing national interests, it can often entail compromising on ideological principles. For example, During the Cold War, the U.S. often supported authoritarian regimes that were human rights violators, in order to theoretically secure the greater national interest of regional stability. Detractors would characterize this attitude as amoral, while supporters would contend that they are merely operating within limits defined by practical reality.[citation needed]
Most recently, former ambassador Dennis Ross advocated this approach to foreign policy in his 2007 book Statecraft: And how to Restore America's Standing in the World.
For the purposes of contrast, and speaking in ideal types, political ideologues would tend to favor principle over other considerations. Such individuals or groups can reject compromises which they see as the abandonment of their ideals, and so may sacrifice political gain in favor of adhering to principles they believe to be constitutive of long term goals.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 09:13 AM   #4
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Nations do not have 'friends', they have allies and that changes depending on Realpolitik.

You two sound like a couple of liberals that worry about feelings. Who gives a fuc what another nation's head thinks of us. It always comes down to Realpolitik.


Examples of US Realpolitik
The policy of Realpolitik was formally introduced to the Richard Nixon White House by Henry Kissinger.[3] In this context, the policy meant dealing with other powerful nations in a practical manner rather than on the basis of political doctrine or ethics—for instance, Nixon's diplomacy with the People's Republic of China, despite the U.S.'s opposition to communism and the previous doctrine of containment. Another example is Kissinger's use of shuttle diplomacy after the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, where he persuaded the Israelis to withdraw partially from the Sinai in deference to the political realities created by the oil crisis.
Realpolitik is distinct from ideological politics in that it is not dictated by a fixed set of rules, but instead tends to be goal-oriented, limited only by practical exigencies. Since realpolitik is ordered toward the most practical means of securing national interests, it can often entail compromising on ideological principles. For example, During the Cold War, the U.S. often supported authoritarian regimes that were human rights violators, in order to theoretically secure the greater national interest of regional stability. Detractors would characterize this attitude as amoral, while supporters would contend that they are merely operating within limits defined by practical reality.[citation needed]
Most recently, former ambassador Dennis Ross advocated this approach to foreign policy in his 2007 book Statecraft: And how to Restore America's Standing in the World.
For the purposes of contrast, and speaking in ideal types, political ideologues would tend to favor principle over other considerations. Such individuals or groups can reject compromises which they see as the abandonment of their ideals, and so may sacrifice political gain in favor of adhering to principles they believe to be constitutive of long term goals.
Realpolitik? I've heard that used before . . . glad you like it though, it does explain much in international politics; after all, "Paris is worth a Mass."
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 09:48 AM   #5
anaximander
Valued Poster
 
anaximander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2, 2011
Location: san antonio
Posts: 572
Encounters: 5
Default so which is it- you can't have both

Jackass realpolitik is why everyone
hates us. We have no principles at State
other than we are unprincipled.

IF Israel had been allowed to crush
Egypt- they were 48 hrs from taking Cairo-
and decisively defeat the arab coalition
we wouldn't have a tenth of the problems
in the region we have now.
No desert storm, no gulf war, very likely
the Twin Towers would still stand.
So we have kissinger to credit for this.

If you truly are antiwar
THOSE WHO LONG FOR PEACE
MUST PREPARE FOR WAR
anaximander is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 09:14 PM   #6
TexTushHog
Professional Tush Hog.
 
TexTushHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,969
Encounters: 7
Default

"We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow."

Lord Palmerston
TexTushHog is offline   Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 10:27 PM   #7
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Realpolitik? I've heard that used before . . . glad you like it though, it does explain much in international politics; after all, "Paris is worth a Mass."
At least a Mass or three!

I have always believed in Realpolitik my friend. It is but another word for Darwinism ...

WTF is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved