Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Except it’s not coming from him. You guys and your bogeymen crack me up.
Then again, this isn’t a bad idea. Filters should be device level and auto reporting. Some parents actually care about their kids and don’t want their sons expecting Little Sally to give him a blumpkin in the grade school bathroom.
|
Or Johnny giving an upper-decker to a well deserved reward to a fellow student who's been a jackass in general. But they would never know about that type of laughter or numbskullery if all things R or X rated were taken off line.
Imagine a world where things like Animal House is outlawed, and so is Alien, -due to Sigourney shows' a tuft of cooter hair. Or the infamous Porkys' series and the identification of a perpetrator via a mole. It's ridiculous to me that censorship vs a viewer warning is more important. Parents can be parents. Nothing more is needed.
That said- if the porn offends someone- why don't we leave that to the parents to monitor- vs. another government agency or a oversight of the same???
When did we need to ensure that we protect the eyes of children who look at Dad's porn stash under his side of the bed, or will Fathers face prison too for looking at some bodacious titties- and letting a kid look at them by not locking them up in a safe? - and while we are at it- will kids who are no longer wet-nursing need to be sheltered by a barrier of mom's fun bags vs. allowing what happens in the home to stay in the home?
Where do we draw the line- or does it need to be a self- governed thing?
Trump's Coming For Your Porn
