Encounter: Sunflower Girl Gia

[RealDoc]

Date: 11/19/21
Name: Gia
User ID:: RealDoc
Phone: 682-222-5848
Email Address: sunflowerdallas0755@gmail.com
URL / Website: https://sunflowergirlz.com EDIT per OP - AG
City: Dallas (Las Colinas)
State: Texas
Address: Las Colinas Blvd
Activities: Kissing, DFK, GFE, Breast Play, BBBJ, Lots of DATY, Face sitting, 69, ACG, Reverse CG, Missionary, Doggy
Hair Length and Color: Long smooth black hair
Age: 28
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: Asian
Physical Description: Requested the appointment date and time by text message and got a fast confirmation. The specific address and apartment number was also sent by text about an hour before the appointment. When I tapped once on the door it was opened by Gia who is beautiful and inviting. She spoke very little English but I was not their for conversation. She had long hair and was dressed in a cute little pilot jacket. 3 or 4 years older than her photos with a few more pounds but I expected it. Her description online was accurate. Very nice 34C natural breasts. I recognized her from the photos. She took my hand and we went into the bedroom. Her body was perfect for me and her white skin was very attractive. She was very enthusiastic and made sure I enjoyed myself.
Recommendation: Yes

[duncantrus]

why reveal the password like a jackass

and hour is not 240, ergo this review is a troll

[Admiral Giggle]

Keep the insults off the threads.

Keep the quacking of the review to yourself as well.

[BigBamboo]

@RealDoc: Why did you reveal the password? The whole point of why it’s called a password is to not be known to all.

[Meeker_22]

Some people can't help themselves. This is a re-run who is an asshole. Burnt his prior handle and now has to start over. There are enough assholes on this board already....don't need new ones or re-treads.

This is a troll...fake review, look at all the errors. He had one mission... what a dick!

[Ronin3]

Originally Posted by Admiral Giggle

Keep the insults off the threads.

Keep the quacking of the review to yourself as well.

Nearly everything about this review is wrong, especially revealing a password. Why is that not being addressed, instead of addressing the questioning of the review?

[Admiral Giggle]

The review was approved by a staff member

You state that everything in the review is wrong. No ECCIE guidelines have been broken in the review. Were you there watching? Were any of the posters in this review there watching? Probably as likely as the staff member who approved the review.

Hundreds of reviews are posted daily.
We read them. We look for the template criteria items to see if they meet approval for credit, or disapproved for no credit.

If they meet the criteria of approval, we approve. If they don't meet the approval criteria, we reject them, however, even when rejected, we don't remove them.

The only ECCIE guidelines that have been broken are in the responses.

If the OP wishes to have his review edited, he can rtm it and make a request. Until then, it stays as is.

If that's actually the password the agency/amp uses for ALL mongers. Then the AMP/Studio had a major lapse in judgement. Why give everyone the same password?

Their IT person obviously sucks at his/her job.

[RealDoc]

I guess some guys think that if someone does not think like you they are a troll or a jack ass. This is only my second ECCIE review since join date in 2016 and I have only used one handle. I used Rubmaps (under a different handle) but it is worthless now. I may not do another review after the hateful replies but I appreciate the monitor trying to help. I did receive a direct request for info which was nice and positive. I appreciate reviews too so I have the best chance of having a good experience and don't waste my money - which is why I gave this review.

Everything I said was accurate including the fee I paid. I repeat - I was given the password and then screened when I asked for an appointment. I cleared it with them before I gave it so I guess they trust ECCIE users. I agree it is more security conscience to screen first. Hopefully they are reading this discussion. We all have to be so careful in Texas because the abuse of a few caused an overreaction in the legislature - IMHO.

[Aoi]

Originally Posted by Admiral Giggle

The review was approved by a staff member

You state that everything in the review is wrong. No ECCIE guidelines have been broken in the review. Were you there watching? Were any of the posters in this review there watching? Probably as likely as the staff member who approved the review.

Hundreds of reviews are posted daily.
We read them. We look for the template criteria items to see if they meet approval for credit, or disapproved for no credit.

If they meet the criteria of approval, we approve. If they don't meet the approval criteria, we reject them, however, even when rejected, we don't remove them.

The only ECCIE guidelines that have been broken are in the responses.

If the OP wishes to have his review edited, he can rtm it and make a request. Until then, it stays as is.

If that's actually the password the agency/amp uses for ALL mongers. Then the AMP/Studio had a major lapse in judgement. Why give everyone the same password?

Their IT person obviously sucks at his/her job.

The point of the password, regardless of its complexity, exists as a filter to block access, at least to a certain degree. Obviously it is you who doesn't understand.

Honest question, is there ever a time where you aren't actually completely useless?

Don't answer. Literally anyone here knows the answer.

[pmdelites]

where in the guidelines does it saw posters cannot post a password to someone or some company's password protected website?
are passwords "real world info" that cannot be posted?

[Kittyhunter]

What are the rates these days for hr?

[Ronin3]

Originally Posted by pmdelites

where in the guidelines does it saw posters cannot post a password to someone or some company's password protected website?
are passwords "real world info" that cannot be posted?

It doesn’t. But when you’re required to screen in order to obtain a password, I imagine many of us think common sense dictates you don’t put it out there for unscreened, public, consumption. If you’ve lived pass the age of 12, you experience the reality that not all rules are correct. Or perhaps more importantly, as in this case, the absence of the rule is incorrect

[RealDoc]

Originally Posted by Kittyhunter

What are the rates these days for hr?

It varies from $200 to $300 depending on the service company (assuming they are not individuals). These girls charge $240 for an hour. They (Sun Health Spa) were $220 until they had to relocate to apartments.

[Admiral Giggle]

Originally Posted by Aoi

The point of the password, regardless of its complexity, exists as a filter to block access, at least to a certain degree. Obviously it is you who doesn't understand.

Honest question, is there ever a time where you aren't actually completely useless?

Don't answer. Literally anyone here knows the answer.

Actually. Yes. I just did make myself usefull. Read the guidelines concerning disrespect to Staff members. When points reach 25, 90day vacations begin.

The Staff is here to adhere to ECCIE guidelines and policy, not the policies of the AMPs/Studios.

Hobbiests can post what they wish in their reviews. If it breaks an ECCIE guideline, we will handle it. If the OP of a review wishes it to be edited, he can send a pm or rtm the review and we will edit.

[d1dragon]

Originally Posted by pmdelites

where in the guidelines does it saw posters cannot post a password to someone or some company's password protected website?
are passwords "real world info" that cannot be posted?

This… many complaining can’t argue with this.
As for screening, I got screened by Lovely with my tel#. Nothing else. I got screened by K-F using Lovely. I got screened by AS by three (1 agency and 2 Indy). I got screened Sun by AS and formal customer.
After seeing almost all ladies at Lovely, I am no longer cleared at Lovely unless I kiss the promoter’s ring or kiss Vicky’s ass.