Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
A declassified version of the whistleblower complaint over President Trump’s conversations with Ukrainian officials about a potential investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter was made public on Thursday morning.
In the 9-page complaint, dated August 12, the unnamed whistleblower cites conversations and details provided by "more than half a dozen U.S. officials,” alleging that Trump is “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election.”
The public release of the complaint comes a day after the White House released a memo summarizing Trump’s controversial July 25 phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump repeatedly urged Zelensky to investigate Biden and son, who sat on the board of a Ukrainian gas company during Biden’s term as vice president.
A declassified version of the whistleblower complaint over President Trump’s conversations with Ukrainian officials about a potential investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter was made public on Thursday morning.
In the 9-page complaint, dated August 12, the unnamed whistleblower cites conversations and details provided by "more than half a dozen U.S. officials,” alleging that Trump is “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election.”
The public release of the complaint comes a day after the White House released a memo summarizing Trump’s controversial July 25 phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump repeatedly urged Zelensky to investigate Biden and son, who sat on the board of a Ukrainian gas company during Biden’s term as vice president.
To top it off, Adam Schiff gave an opening statement today concerning President Trumps phone conversation with the President of the Ukraine. Schiff just made up shit.
Yep. An all-out impeachment effort in search of a transgression that can reasonably be sold to the public as something that should be considered an impeachable offense. So far, so failed.
The "Russian collusion" narrative landed with a thud. The Mueller report similarly was nothing more than a busted flush. Will we soon see called strike three?
Pretty fair chance.
Here are a couple of other things that some Democratic partisan fools seem to be forgetting.
First, the House impeachment process involves a fucking trial - that is; in the legal sense. The defendant's attorneys therefore have a free hand to call all manner of witnesses. For instance, all sorts of people who served at the highest levels of the Obama administration. It doesn't take a lot of perspicacity to see that this could quickly get very embarrassing and very inconvenient for a number of high-profile Democrats (including Obama).
Second, as everyone participating in this forum undoubtedly knows, the probability of conviction by the Senate is approximately 0.0%.
Third, House impeachment followed by failure to convict would be more likely to redound to the benefit of Trump than to either Democratic congressional members or presidential candidates.
So Trump would then be able to claim "witch hunt" victimhood and vindication, and thus would be handed a big club with which to brutally bludgeon his tormentors - who would be seen as obsessed with a president they hate and consider illegitimate, rather than interested in pursuing better health care policy, good trade policy, or anything else designed to benefit the American middle class.
Yep. An all-out impeachment effort in search of a transgression that can reasonably be sold to the public as something that should be considered an impeachable offense. So far, so failed.
The "Russian collusion" narrative landed with a thud. The Mueller report similarly was nothing more than a busted flush. Will we soon see called strike three?
Pretty fair chance.
Here are a couple of other things that some Democratic partisan fools seem to be forgetting.
First, the House impeachment process involves a fucking trial - that is; in the legal sense. The defendant's attorneys therefore have a free hand to call all manner of witnesses. For instance, all sorts of people who served at the highest levels of the Obama administration. It doesn't take a lot of perspicacity to see that this could quickly get very embarrassing and very inconvenient for a number of high-profile Democrats (including Obama).
Second, as everyone participating in this forum undoubtedly knows, the probability of conviction by the Senate is approximately 0.0%.
Third, House impeachment followed by failure to convict would be more likely to redound to the benefit of Trump than to either Democratic congressional members or presidential candidates.
So Trump would then be able to claim "witch hunt" victimhood and vindication, and thus would be handed a big club with which to brutally bludgeon his tormentors - who would be seen as obsessed with a president they hate and consider illegitimate, rather than interested in pursuing better health care policy, good trade policy, or anything else designed to benefit the American middle class.
Just take the words of Trump about and to the Ukraine president. Are you saying he wasn't asking him to investigate Biden and his son, that he needed a favor? This is a witch hunt? Its all made up?
To top it off, Adam Schiff gave an opening statement today concerning President Trumps phone conversation with the President of the Ukraine. Schiff just made up shit.
Schiff just proved he never had any evidence at all of collusion when he said this was the "most graphic evidence yet". and what does he have now? hearsay. the so-called "whistle blower" apparently isn't even a member of Intelligence and wasn't not even present during any of the call between Trump and the Ukraine president.
this is treason. by the Democrats to overthrow an elect result they didn't like and couldn't accept happened.
This is all you need to know about the whole hoax. They're making it all up!
If they have such a solid case why do they need to make up (Adam) Schitt?
Schitt called it a "parody". Adam doesn't know the difference between parody and LIES!
I'm going to humor you for just one post, although I don't think you believe anything you wrote. this is all made up? the transcript is phony? what exactly is fake about the transcript Trump himself released?
the parody was good, I thought.. I get your lack of finding humor, considering the real charges your team faces.
I'm going to humor you for just one post, although I don't think you believe anything you wrote. this is all made up? the transcript is phony? what exactly is fake about the transcript Trump himself released?
the parody was good, I thought.. I get your lack of finding humor, considering the real charges your team faces.
I'm going to humor you.. what in the transcript is an impeachable offense?
Schiff just proved he never had any evidence at all of collusion when he said this was the "most graphic evidence yet". and what does he have now? hearsay. the so-called "whistle blower" apparently isn't even a member of Intelligence and wasn't not even present during any of the call between Trump and the Ukraine president.
this is treason. by the Democrats to overthrow an elect result they didn't like and couldn't accept happened.
you really think what you wrote shows treason? you are beyond ridiculous. your team keeps going back to the idea that it is second-hand knowledge. that was one of the talking points Trump handed to your team, that OOPS, got into the Democrats' email.
so what that it is second hand? it was revealed to be completely accurate. that just means many people, and at least one person who leaked it to the whistleblower, know how rogue and lawless Trump is.
you really think what you wrote shows treason? you are beyond ridiculous. your team keeps going back to the idea that it is second-hand knowledge. that was one of the talking points Trump handed to your team, that OOPS, got into the Democrats' email.
so what that it is second hand? it was revealed to be completely accurate. that just means many people, and at least one person who leaked it to the whistleblower, know how rogue and lawless Trump is.
you'll vote for Trump again. you will ... because despite your constant "blame it all on Republicans" rhetoric you appear smart enough not to vote for Clinton, and you won't vote for Biden, Warren or Bernie. Mayor Buttpulg doesn't really have a chance, and neither does Andy "ying" yang. Burrito O'Dork anyone? BAHHAA. your girl Harris tanked, Fidel Castro never had a chance.
and once again you deflect by not stating what is impeachable in that transcript. all of it? is that your opinion?
working with a Foreign Government to alter an election, and withholding appropriated funds to that Government if it didn't go along with the scheme.
so we should give money to any corrupt government that wants it, right?
what's treasonous about questioning the new Ukraine administration's honesty? they have a known track record of corruption, and why are we even giving any money to them anyway? we need that money in the US, right??
Read the full whistleblower complaint against Trump
