Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 398
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70819
biomed163628
Yssup Rider61234
gman4453341
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48794
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43216
The_Waco_Kid37397
CryptKicker37228
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-03-2019, 05:11 PM   #1
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default A Thought on the Mueller Report

I am not an attorney or Constitutional attorney. I would invite comments on my thoughts from those with more expertise in the matter than I.



Controversy - What did Mueller report as to Trump and any crimes. Seems it is accepted that "Collusion with Russia to influence the 2016 election by Trump/campaign did not occur.

It is also reported that DOJ policy is not to comment on individuals whose actions do not rise to the level of "indictable".

There is substantial opinion that a sitting POTUS may not be indicted for crimes. A POTUS may be impeached, tried in the Senate, and if convicted and removed from office, then indicted for crimes committed.
Mueller was restricted from indicting the POTUS - as I read the DOJ rules. Still, if Mueller and minions have evidence of indictable crimes committed by Trump, et al, is there not a responsibility to release that evidence to the House for evaluation for Impeachment and trial?
Mueller's mealy-mouthed report and responses, and modified by AG Barr, are interpreted by the Left as evidence of crimes, and on the Right as exoneration of Trump.
Yet Schiff and Nadler have been back-tracking on their "I have evidence warranting impeachment in my Hand", and on bringing impeachment action to the House for action - despite the clamoring of the far-Leftists in the House - now numbering about 4+ favoring immediate impeachment.
Do Schiff and Nadler now realize Mueller brought nothing to them warranting Impeachment- despite the fact that impeachment is a political act - and Trump could be impeached by the DPST House for "Breathing".
Perhaps Mueller's report is a complete nothing-burger for the Leftists and Impeachment enthusiasts. If there were evidence of impeachable crimes, would not Mueller and the DOJ been responsible to refer that information to the House Judiciary Committee for consideration? Yet, nothing has been forwarded that defines "high crimes / misdemeanors" by the DOJ. Yes, AG Barr is a Trump political appointee, but smart enough to know better than to try to cover=up evidence of impeachable crimes committed by Trump. If such crimes were committed and held in evidence by DOJ, I do not believe AG Barr could sit on such evidence.

Which leads me to believe Mueller deliberately submitted a wishy-washy report to be taken as to whatever viewpoint a reader wished - Right or Left.
Bottom Line - I do not believe Mueller has anything as to evidence of any crimes by Trump.


Open for informed discussion. Lexus Lover - I would entertain your thoughts.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 06:55 PM   #2
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,216
Encounters: 29
Default

What Mueller and his merry band of political hacks did is the best example why special prosecutors should be abolished.
bambino is online now   Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 11:39 PM   #3
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

the meuller report was the bomb. the presser was the fuse the lit the bomb.


its purpose is to create problems for Trump.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 11:45 PM   #4
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,397
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
the meuller report was the bomb. the presser was the fuse the lit the bomb.


its purpose is to create problems for Trump.

it will expose the Mueller sham for what it was .. a witch hunt. Mueller will not testify. he can't. he'll go to prison if he does. he'll take the 5th like the asshole he is.


and yet a handful of uber libs here quote footnotes from the report .. like that means anything?


Barr can and will use the full unredacted data against Mueller. it will show the true context and the lack of any substance to so-called obstruction.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 11:50 PM   #5
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=106...&postcount=355
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 02:12 AM   #6
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,758
Encounters: 10
Default There Has to Be a There There... or Somewhere! I Just Know It!

Barr: Has the Special Counsel reached a conclusion yet?

Mueller: Yes, Mr. Attorney General. After two years of investigation and carefully reviewing all of the evidence, we find the POTUS is - "NOT NOT GUILTY".

Barr: WTF???????
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 05:53 AM   #7
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 43,216
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Barr: Has the Special Counsel reached a conclusion yet?

Mueller: Yes, Mr. Attorney General. After two years of investigation and carefully reviewing all of the evidence, we find the POTUS is - "NOT NOT GUILTY".

Barr: WTF???????
Is Mueller WTF?
bambino is online now   Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 08:32 AM   #8
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

They want to believe ,, just more obstruction
rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved