Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > Diamonds and Tuxedos
test
Diamonds and Tuxedos Glamour, elegance, and sophistication. That's what it's all about here in ECCIE's newest forum which caters to those with expensive tastes, lavish lifestyles, and an appetite for upscale entertainment.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70825
biomed163710
Yssup Rider61285
gman4453365
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48824
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37425
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Thread Closed
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-09-2011, 10:23 AM   #1
Marshall
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 14, 2011
Location: Wild Wild West!
Posts: 1,556
Default FBI Busts Man Duped In Facebook Ploy

FBI Busts Man Duped In Facebook Ploy

Former wife posed as 17-year-old in online scheme


JUNE 7--Embroiled in a contentious child custody fight, an Indiana woman decided last month to pose on Facebook as a comely teenage girl in a bid to surreptitiously extract damaging information from her ex-husband.
The scheme proved so successful, in fact, that FBI agents last Friday arrested Angela Voelkert’s former spouse on a felony charge for allegedly installing a listening device in her vehicle, according to court records.
Voelkert’s Facebook plot--detailed by FBI Agent Robert Dane in a sworn affidavit filed in U.S. District Court in South Bend--began in late-May when she opened a Facebook account in the name of “Jessica Studebaker.”
The purported 17-year-old’s profile--which remains online, but locked--includes the photo of “Studebaker” seen at right. The true identity of the girl seen in the photo is unknown, nor is it clear where Voelkert got the image.
Voelkert, 29, used the bogus Facebook profile to “friend” her former husband David, 38. Angela Voelkert then asked a pal to e-mail her former spouse through the Facebook account since she was concerned that he might recognize her “style of writing.” Voelkert though, Dane noted, “monitored the emails on ‘Jessica Studebaker’s’ Facebook account.”
Within days of becoming friends, David Voelkert began exchanging Facebook messages with “Studebaker,” telling the teen about his children and Angela. On May 26, Voelkert wrote that he had sold his business and “planned to move somewhere warm with his kids, that he was still going to his next court dates, and would take off soon after.”
Voelkert, the affidavit notes, runs a South Bend business that sells and installs sophisticated video and audio equipment, and counts police departments among its customers. A check of Voelkert’s Facebook page this afternoon shows that “Studebaker” remains among his 153 friends.
In a May 31 Facebook message, Voelkert, pictured at left, told “Studebaker” that he had secretly installed a GPS tracker in his wife’s van and was using the device to monitor her movements. He “went on to discuss what kind of trouble that they could get in for doing this,” and asked the teenager to “delete the message so there is no trace of talking about it,” Dane reported.
Along with disclosing that he planned to flee with his children in early-June, Voelkert wrote that he was “going to find someone to take care of her and now it will be easier because I know where she is at all times.” He then added, “you should find someone at your school, there should be some gang bangers there that would put a cap in her ass for $10,000. I am just done with her crap!”
In a subsequent message, Voelkert stated, “With me gone with my kids, the police can’t pin anything on me as I will be in another state, so I will be fine.” Voelkert has not been charged with plotting to harm his wife.
Busted Friday, Voelkert appeared yesterday in federal court, where a judge scheduled a detention hearing for this Thursday. Since he is locked up in the St. Joseph County Jail, Voelkert will have to seek to reschedule a Superior Court hearing scheduled for tomorrow in his child custody case.
Marshall is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 10:26 AM   #2
Marshall
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 14, 2011
Location: Wild Wild West!
Posts: 1,556
Default

I loved this article....I can think of many interesting things I'd like to find out using this technique......I'll bet Huma wishes she thought of testing her husband's fidelity with this technique before she married the weiner.....HA! HA! HA! HA!
Marshall is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 10:44 AM   #3
Selena Romano
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 47235
Join Date: Sep 29, 2010
Location: Galleria area in North Dallas. Private apartment
Posts: 2,747
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Wow. She is pretty thought
Selena Romano is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 08:16 PM   #4
Karl Hungus
Gaining Momentum
 
Karl Hungus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2, 2011
Location: Neartown
Posts: 38
Default Update

Nope. It was a setup within a setup. The feds dropped the charges. See the husband's prior affidavit below. TFF.

I am seriously glad I am not a divorce attorney. It is way too messy and personal. That being said, anyone want to share any stories about messy divorces?





And Selena, you've got way better curves. I mean, you rock that white chemise.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1voelkert.jpg (438.3 KB, 323 views)
Karl Hungus is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 09:27 PM   #5
atlcomedy
Valued Poster
 
atlcomedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 5, 2009
Location: Eatin' Peaches
Posts: 2,645
Default

Nutz!!!

The affidavit thing is kind of odd, too. I mean what does this really do for the guy?

Note the timing/sequence of events in the affidavit is vague. I'd bet the guy was duped...played/chatted/messaged/whatever the kids are calling it these days with her...sobered up (literally and/or figuratively)...realized he was duped & decided to execute this statement.

My question though: What are the broader implications of the document for the rest of us if a court finds this guys "investigative" method is solid? Say some sort of TGTBT "offer," sexual in nature or otherwise, is presented to an individual. One one hand he thinks something is a little off about it; on the other he doesn't want to miss out if it is genuine. Can he sign a statement saying he thinks the whole thing is a ruse but he is just playing along and the incriminating statements he made were just to gain the trust of the other party and have the document serve as his "get out of jail free card?" Afterall, he's just a doing his civic duty and trying to bring down a scammer....
atlcomedy is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 09:40 PM   #6
Fast Gunn
Valued Poster
 
Fast Gunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 7, 2010
Location: two steps ahead of the posse.
Posts: 5,356
Encounters: 31
Exclamation Set-up Within A Set-up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Hungus View Post
Nope. It was a setup within a setup. The feds dropped the charges. See the husband's prior affidavit below. TFF.
A set-up within a set-up? How does this work and how far down can this scheme go?

Seems complicated as hell to pull it off and to remember exactly what your lines are and what marks you are supposed to hit!


. . . And with no dress rehearsals, it seems you are bound to fuck it up!
Fast Gunn is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 10:01 PM   #7
Karl Hungus
Gaining Momentum
 
Karl Hungus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2, 2011
Location: Neartown
Posts: 38
Default

It was good enough for the Feds. They dismissed the complaint. The question in my mind, however, is did this guy get deflowered (or worse) at the fed detention center. If so, it was a pretty poor gambit and the wife clearly won. However, I am guessing the divorce judge is going to get the point that neither party here is a real winner--and maybe that was the strategy, which is really fucking sad. If you are going to fight, don't fight stupid.
Karl Hungus is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 10:14 PM   #8
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

The man and his wife had a pending court date on 8 June. The man suspected the new Facebook friend was his wife and swore an affidavit, 25 May (2 wks before the court date), to that affect. In his affidavit he claimed that he suspected his wife was trying to set him up, and that it would be his purpose to use Facebook to turn the tables on his wife. He made it clear that any evidence that his wife subsequently claimed to garner through Facebook would, in fact, be lies told by him in order to expose his wife's plot to ensnare him.

His wife tripped the snare when she reported to the authorities that she had evidence that her husband was planning to have her killed. Since there was no actual murder plot, she instead exposed her own plot to intrude on and continue to disrupt her husband's life - which her husband then used, or plans to use, in court to obtain a more favorable settlement.
I B Hankering is offline  
Old 06-11-2011, 04:08 PM   #9
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default She hanged herself. He just gave her the rope.

"Suspecting it was [the wife] all along, [the husband] had gotten a notarized affidavit shortly after Jessica came online. In it, he said that he believed this was not a real person but rather his ex-wife or someone she knows. He said he was engaging with this person and lying in order to gain proof that his ex-wife was tampering with his personal life, proof he would then use himself in court. "In no way do I have plans to leave with my children or do any harm to [the wife] or anyone else," he wrote above the Indiana notary's stamp. He then kept one copy and gave another to a relative for backup.


"The timeline worked, his affidavit coming days before he said anything incriminating. The notary was interviewed, the document authenticated, and his case was dismissed. Situations like this are why the phrase "Oh, snap!" was invented."


http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/06/10/...llnation-yahoo
I B Hankering is offline  
Old 06-14-2011, 08:28 PM   #10
Valery Paige
Pending Age Verification
 
User ID: 86666
Join Date: Jun 14, 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 1
Default

Interesting! Hmmmmmm ....
Valery Paige is offline  
Old 06-24-2011, 02:07 PM   #11
LusciousSadie
Pending Age Verification
 
User ID: 54151
Join Date: Nov 11, 2010
Location: McAllen, TX.
Posts: 19
Default

Seriously sounds like some tricky business to me... so glad I am not getting married (or divorced) anytime soon!
LusciousSadie is offline  
Thread Closed

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved