Please add Tattoo to the search function

[Sickpuppy]

In addition to the many other filters, how about adding tattoos (with the various answers in the drop down) to the search providers function? OK guys, please vote for or against. If enough vote for, maybe they'll add it.

[LusciousLadyLumps]

I think it is a good idea. That way a person has the option of seeing someone with tattoos. Variety is the spice of life. While I do not have any, a lot of providers do and some clients enjoy seeing them.

[Gotyour6]

Lol,

there would be two girls without on this board.

[RideFreeInTexas]

Sickpuppy, it's quite clear from the other threads you've started expressing your disdain for tatts, and from the responses, that you are pretty much the only person here that would care about such a feature. All I've got to say is if you exclude ladies with tatts from your activities, then you must be one lonely dude.

[Guest031416-1]

it seems to me that a lot of girls post photos in their showcases, and also talk about tats, wouldn't that be a way to filter the girls by their lack of tats, or that they have them?

[Bushjumper]

I find myself agreeing with Sickpuppy.

[Lucky LaRue]

Originally Posted by RideFreeInTexas

Sickpuppy, it's quite clear from the other threads you've started expressing your disdain for tatts, and from the responses, that you are pretty much the only person here that would care about such a feature. All I've got to say is if you exclude ladies with tatts from your activities, then you must be one lonely dude.

Here Here and may I say nice Street Glide. Wish I had not traded mine.

[universalenergy]

Originally Posted by rodeomann22

it seems to me that a lot of girls post photos in their showcases, and also talk about tats, wouldn't that be a way to filter the girls by their lack of tats, or that they have them?

Tattoo's are photoshoped out to protect privacy. P411 has the option and it is a valid feature. If a person has an issue with tattoos then it is a valid issue to him.

[Lucky LaRue]

Originally Posted by universalenergy

Tattoo's are photoshoped out to protect privacy. P411 has the option and it is a valid feature. If a person has an issue with tattoos then it is a valid issue to him.

While that may be true. A person whom has that opinion should ask about such variances. It is just as simple as asking do You kiss open mouth or closed. But then I guess some would rather read this before initial communication.

[Sickpuppy]

I don't have an issue with 1-2 discreet tattoos, since nowadays almost every provider has at least one. The problem is you can't search by "one", "a few" or "several" and the latter two options often indicate excessive ink all over the canvas - a big turnoff to me.

As is, without any type of filter, one is forced to search based on the other preferences or "keywords" regarding activities and it gets very tedious opening photos only to find multiple tats.

Seems to me any guy would vote "for" your right to choose based on personal preference, if it doesn't interfere with any else's right to ignore that option. But, that's the way we generally think in TX, except for the biker in Dallas. Since he chose to dis me for proposing it, he must be a Yankee transplant or a liberal (they always know what’s best for you, despite your requests or objections). BTW, I’ve got a “CM” designation on my license. Those that do, will know what I mean.

[JRLawrence]

Originally Posted by LusciousLadyLumps

I think it is a good idea. That way a person has the option of seeing someone with tattoos. Variety is the spice of life. While I do not have any, a lot of providers do and some clients enjoy seeing them.

It would also give us the option of NOT seeing someone with tattoos. Any tattoo is a big turn off for some of us.

I know a lot of girls have them, but even one small one is a turn off for some. Small ones can be ignored, maybe. But the fully covered arms, and tattoos on the breast is just not understood by some.

I know guys, even one of my granddaughters has several tattoos, and she loves them.

Just making an observation.

JR

[Island]

Originally Posted by universalenergy

Tattoo's are photoshoped out to protect privacy. P411 has the option and it is a valid feature. If a person has an issue with tattoos then it is a valid issue to him.

Some do photoshop their tats out to protect themselves, especially when they are one of a kind and very recognizable. I do so. That doesn't mean that I put "no tats" in my showcase. I most certainly do. I assume most of the other ladies do as well. If not, then certainly they should tell someone just in case someone like "sickpuppy" who has a hatred of them, wouldn't see them and be disappointed.

These tattoo threads are getting really old. You've stated your opinion....several dozen times. I think we get it.

[juuicyjvasquesz]

I NEVER PHOTO SHOP THEM AND WOULDN'T, BUT I ONLY HAVE A FEW IN VERY DISCRETE PLACES

[Island]

Originally Posted by juuicyjvasquesz

I NEVER PHOTO SHOP THEM AND WOULDN'T, BUT I ONLY HAVE A FEW IN VERY DISCRETE PLACES

You're so lucky you don't have to. I take most of my own pictures and then i have to edit all my tats out because they are all distinct and one of a kind and I have stalkers, one that's been going on for over six years. Had to change my name and everything years ago!! I wish I could just post mine.

[jismo]

I think its value added. I posted a ISO a while back. some gals with tatoos replied. I was looking for someone with tatoos. a gal I looked at didnt show any in showcase. All photo shopped out. In real life she was fantastic.