Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 406
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
Starscream66 285
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 273
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70869
biomed164180
Yssup Rider61770
gman4453562
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48948
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37769
CryptKicker37281
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-10-2015, 11:09 PM   #121
Rey Lengua
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 24, 2013
Location: Aqui !
Posts: 8,942
Encounters: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
Sorry dick nose won't work,even whackoff said it was you. WR is your bro gay rey .
ONCE AGAIN YOUR reading and comprehension skills fail YOU EKIM. Check out post # 109 to see that it was YOUR hero woomby that WACO was referring to. But you just keep on WKing for woomby now, ya here ! Have you been sampling the rabbit pellets a little too much EKIM ? !!
Rey Lengua is offline   Quote
Old 10-10-2015, 11:13 PM   #122
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rey Lengua View Post
ONCE AGAIN YOUR reading and comprehension skills fail YOU EKIM. Check out post # 109 to see that it was YOUR hero woomby that WACO was referring to. But you just keep on WKing for woomby now, ya here ! Have you been sampling the rabbit pellets a little too much EKIM ? !!
Who is ekim gay rey? Keep on sucking sperm bank's ass little ass kisser.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 02:25 AM   #123
southtown4488
Valued Poster
 
southtown4488's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2014
Location: texas
Posts: 1,178
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
You'll have to modify and/or repeal the 2nd Amendment first. Good luck?
If I had said 15 years ago. . . that gays should be allowed to marry in all 50 states and the vast majority of Americans should support it, including gangsta rappers. . . the response would probably have been. . . good luck.
southtown4488 is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 04:23 AM   #124
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southtown4488 View Post
If I had said 15 years ago. . . that gays should be allowed to marry in all 50 states and the vast majority of Americans should support it, including gangsta rappers. . . the response would probably have been. . . good luck.
Is there a "Gays Can Marry" constitutional amendment?

Once upon a time the "law of the land" was that the amendments applied only to the Federal Government and not the States. The SCOTUS expanded the APPLICATION of the amendments to the STATES. Do you see the "operative" words .... "EXPANDED THE APPLICATION OF THE AMENDMENTS"?

Again, "good luck" with repealing the 2nd Amendment!!!

Prohibitions don't work well in this country. That's why people sneak in.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 04:42 PM   #125
southtown4488
Valued Poster
 
southtown4488's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2014
Location: texas
Posts: 1,178
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Is there a "Gays Can Marry" constitutional amendment?

Once upon a time the "law of the land" was that the amendments applied only to the Federal Government and not the States. The SCOTUS expanded the APPLICATION of the amendments to the STATES. Do you see the "operative" words .... "EXPANDED THE APPLICATION OF THE AMENDMENTS"?

Again, "good luck" with repealing the 2nd Amendment!!!

Prohibitions don't work well in this country. That's why people sneak in.
The 2nd amd doesn't need to be repealed, it just needs to be interpreted differently. . . it states "A well regulated Militia".


In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence" and limited the applicability of the Second Amendment to the federal government.[9] In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia".[ (Wikipedia)

when enough Americans get fed up with having ten times the gun homicide rate per capita than England and Australia and demand a change for the better, the courts will follow. . . just as they did with gay marriage.
southtown4488 is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 04:50 PM   #126
Rey Lengua
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 24, 2013
Location: Aqui !
Posts: 8,942
Encounters: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southtown4488 View Post
The 2nd amd doesn't need to be repealed, it just needs to be interpreted differently. . . it states "A well regulated Militia".


In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence" and limited the applicability of the Second Amendment to the federal government.[9] In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia".[ (Wikipedia)

when enough Americans get fed up with having ten times the gun homicide rate per capita than England and Australia and demand a change for the better, the courts will follow. . . just as they did with gay marriage.
So will YOU be clamoring for "sanctuary city" status for YOUR home town, suckclown ? Let the pobre putos break into YOUR house while YOU'RE there, and unarmed chapete, and see how THAT works for YOU. Pero, that's YOUR gente, right !
Rey Lengua is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 06:01 PM   #127
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southtown4488 View Post
The 2nd amd doesn't need to be repealed, it just needs to be interpreted wrongly. . . it states "A well regulated Militia".


In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence" and limited the applicability of the Second Amendment to the federal government.[9] In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia".[ (Wikipedia)

when enough Americans get fed up with having ten times the gun homicide rate per capita than England and Australia and demand a change for the better, the courts will follow. . . just as they did with gay marriage.
FTFY, suck-clown.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 06:04 PM   #128
WombRaider
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
FTFY, suck-clown.
What makes the way it was interpreted in 1876 or 1939 wrong and the current ruling right? Timing? You're the suckclown, you inbred fuckstick.
WombRaider is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 06:09 PM   #129
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider View Post
What makes the way it was interpreted in 1876 or 1939 wrong and the current ruling right? Timing? You're the suckclown, you inbred fuckstick.
Those rulings ignored the Founding Father's intent, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 06:12 PM   #130
WombRaider
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Those rulings ignored the Founding Father's intent, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
Says who? You? You don't anymore know the founders' intent than you know how to rise and fucking fly, you faggot fucktard.
WombRaider is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 06:17 PM   #131
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider View Post
Says who? You? You don't anymore know the founders' intent than you know how to rise and fucking fly, you faggot fucktard.
Contrary to your mentally impaired understanding of and your lib-retarded disdain for American history, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, the Founding Fathers often spelled out their intent to win support for the new constitution. Their intent is there for any literate student of history to read, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Furthermore, in Heller, the SC ruled that you and your ilk distort and misrepresent the SC's finding in Miller, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. So, STFU, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 06:21 PM   #132
WombRaider
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Contrary to your mentally impaired understanding of and your lib-retarded disdain for American history, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, the Founding Fathers often spelled out their intent to win support for the new constitution. Their intent is there for any literate student of history to read, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Furthermore, in Heller, the SC ruled that you and your ilk distort and misrepresent the SC's finding in Miller, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. So, STFU, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
As usual, you assume you know more than SCOTUS. If you're so smart, why are you on a hooker board acting like a fucking repetitive retard? The intent was for militia members only, not private citizens. Fucktard.
WombRaider is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 06:25 PM   #133
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider View Post
As usual, you assume you know more than SCOTUS. If you're so smart, why are you on a hooker board acting like a fucking repetitive retard? The intent was for militia members only, not private citizens. Fucktard.
The SC used the Founding Fathers' intent in its Heller ruling, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, and, in effect, it said you and your ilk are mendacious liars and misrepresent the ruling in Miller, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. So it would be your supercilious ass that has a problem with the SC, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 07:27 PM   #134
WombRaider
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The SC used the Founding Fathers' intent in its Heller ruling, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, and, in effect, it said you and your ilk are mendacious liars and misrepresent the ruling in Miller, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. So it would be your supercilious ass that has a problem with the SC, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
Interesting how you skip over Cruikshank.
WombRaider is offline   Quote
Old 10-11-2015, 07:33 PM   #135
Old-T
Valued Poster
 
Old-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider View Post
Interesting how you skip over Cruikshank.
Skipping over inconsiderate facts is a basic premise of this entire board, and no one is more "expert" at it than IB.
Old-T is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved