Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
. . . hildebeest actually broke the law and obstructed justice:
Yeah, keep telling yourself she committed a crime. Right Waco? Maybe Jussie Smollett will beleive you too.
And Barr and Rosenstein ruled there was no "obstruction".
Stupid double talk. Dismissed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
. . . Dershowitz noted.
Comey announced the decision not to prosecute Clinton but at the same time described her actions in legally ambiguous terms, which helped fuel speculation from political opponents that she had committed a crime.
How do we know? Because Comey said so. Right lustylady?
How do we know? Because Comey said so. Right lustylady?
Case closed.
hildebeest asked if she could use a private server. She was told "no" because it was in violation of Federal laws. She did it anyway. hildebeest violated Federal laws. Fact!
hildebeest received and transmitted classified intel over an unsecure server in violation of Federal law. Fact!
hildebeest destroyed evidence after it was subpoenaed by Congress in violation of Federal law. Fact!
hildebeest shared classified intel with her maid who has no security clearance. Fact!
hildebeest violated FOIA when she didn't provide the State Department with copies of her email transactions. Fact!
The case isn't closed. Barr is reopening the case. Fact!
hildebeest asked if she could use a private server. She was told "no" because it was in violation of Federal laws. She did it anyway. hildebeest violated Federal laws. Fact!
hildebeest received and transmitted classified intel over an unsecure server in violation of Federal law. Fact!
hildebeest destroyed evidence after it was subpoenaed by Congress in violation of Federal law. Fact!
hildebeest shared classified intel with her maid who has no security clearance. Fact!
hildebeest violated FOIA when she didn't provide the State Department with copies of her email transactions. Fact!
The case isn't closed. Barr is reopening the case. Fact!
and it gets even better. allow me to show you a president lying. I give you .. Obama.
this of course is a LIE.
this is from the FBI as the direct source.
Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal
probably fairly close, about 30% of the population beleive his majesty's shit doesnt stink,and would stand up for him regardless of anything he did or plans to do, so sad !
......I watched Giuliani on Meet the Press this morning. He frustrated and demolished Chuck Todd.....
Which isn't difficult at all.
Unless Todd is lobbing softballs to Dimms who appear on MTP, he shows time and time again what a complete idiot he is. Just another shill for Nancy and Chuck (Schumer)….
Unless Todd is lobbing softballs to Dimms who appear on MTP, he shows time and time again what a complete idiot he is. Just another shill for Nancy and Chuck (Schumer)….
A well paid but incompetent shill. Most of his guest commentators aren't even third choice "analysts".
Busch, jr
they were elected by the electoral colllege, the people voted for hilary/gore
gore woulda been awesome.
at least a 1st female president would have felt pressure to do well
trump only cares about trump and kfc
While Clinton received 2.87 million more votes nationwide (the largest margin ever for a candidate who lost the electoral college), a margin of 2.1%, Trump won a majority of electoral votes, with a total of 306 electors from 30 states, including upset victories in the pivotal Rust Belt region. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_U...ntial_election
probably fairly close, about 30% of the population beleive his majesty's shit doesnt stink,and would stand up for him regardless of anything he did or plans to do, so sad !
Whats sad is if Trump wasn't elected we would have had a piece of shit like Hillary Clinton as President or an idiot like Bernie Sanders who doesn't know shit. If Trump is so bad what the Democrats have for 2020 is even worse.
Busch, jr
they were elected by the electoral colllege, the people voted for hilary/gore
gore woulda been awesome.
at least a 1st female president would have felt pressure to do well
trump only cares about trump and kfc
While Clinton received 2.87 million more votes nationwide (the largest margin ever for a candidate who lost the electoral college), a margin of 2.1%, Trump won a majority of electoral votes, with a total of 306 electors from 30 states, including upset victories in the pivotal Rust Belt region. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_U...ntial_election
but she won only 20 states plus D.C to Trump's 30.
Busch, jr
they were elected by the electoral colllege, the people voted for hilary/gore
gore woulda been awesome.
at least a 1st female president would have felt pressure to do well
trump only cares about trump and kfc
While Clinton received 2.87 million more votes nationwide (the largest margin ever for a candidate who lost the electoral college), a margin of 2.1%, Trump won a majority of electoral votes, with a total of 306 electors from 30 states, including upset victories in the pivotal Rust Belt region. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_U...ntial_election
Some people really can't let it go. Subtract California and Trump wins "popular vote" in the sum of the other 49 states and DC by 1.3+ million votes.
It continues to be great living in a representative republic where the "mob" of one or a couple states can't take control.
Busch, jr
they were elected by the electoral colllege, the people voted for hilary/gore
gore woulda been awesome.
at least a 1st female president would have felt pressure to do well
trump only cares about trump and kfc
While Clinton received 2.87 million more votes nationwide (the largest margin ever for a candidate who lost the electoral college), a margin of 2.1%, Trump won a majority of electoral votes, with a total of 306 electors from 30 states, including upset victories in the pivotal Rust Belt region. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_U...ntial_election
History lesson that's why we have the electoral college! So the idiot's in Cal and NY elect a president! Hillary and Gore lost get over it
Busch, jr
they were elected by the electoral colllege, the people voted for hilary/gore
gore woulda been awesome.
at least a 1st female president would have felt pressure to do well
trump only cares about trump and kfc
While Clinton received 2.87 million more votes nationwide (the largest margin ever for a candidate who lost the electoral college), a margin of 2.1%, Trump won a majority of electoral votes, with a total of 306 electors from 30 states, including upset victories in the pivotal Rust Belt region. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_U...ntial_election
Did you deliberately misread what was posted, or do you enjoy having marginal reading skills?
Trump won the presidency in accordance with the Constitutional dictates required to win the presidency. hildebeest's lazy ass enjoyed her wine more than campaigning in Wisconsin or at Notre Dame. hildebeest lost her ass in 2016. hildebeest was a piece of shit candidate. Get over it. End of story.
That's a complete distortion. I watched Giuliani on Meet the Press this morning. He frustrated and demolished Chuck Todd. The way you and the left are spinning what Guiliani said is shameful and deceitful and pernicious.
Was it ok for the NY Times to publish the Pentagon Papers in 1971? The Supreme Court said yes. They didn't steal the papers, they published what was stolen by someone else. And that involved classified material, not campaign chatter.
When Wikileaks tossed all those DNC/John Podesta emails into the public domain, was the media "taking Russian help" to boost their readership/viewership by reporting it? Was that a crime?
Of course trump hammered home the embarrassing disclosures on the campaign stump! What was he supposed to do, ignore them?
Just like hildebeest hammered home that "grab em by the pussy" tape! You remember... the one she colluded with NBC/ABC to timely release for maximum embarrassment 3 weeks before Election Day? Why don't we spend $35 million investigating how that happened?
So what's it gonna be, Jaxson?
Do you want to argue the SCOTUS erred in its Pentagon Papers decision?
Giuliani clearly stated accepting aid from the Russians was ok and not a crime. I believe my eyes and ears.
The hot topic is obstruction of justice by BLOTUS and the facts are there in volume two of Muellers report.There are several references to BLOTUS instructing numerous enablers to fire Comey. Hell there’s a section where BLOTUS is trying to convince Sessions to take back the Russia investigations and open up investigations against political enemies
There’s a hell of a lot more evidence than they had on Nixon or Clinton. So it’s coming. If the Senate wants to sit on their ass and ignore it they will pay the price.
I Stand With Mueller
Giuliani clearly stated accepting aid from the Russians was ok and not a crime. I believe my eyes and ears.
No, Giuliani said it's not a crime for a candidate to tell voters how corrupt and dishonest his opponent is - by referring to material that has already been widely disseminated in the mainstream media and verified as true!
Obviously you (mis)heard what you wanted to (mis)hear!
Here is the actual transcript of yesterday's Meet the Press show.
The hot topic is obstruction of justice by BLOTUS and the facts are there in volume two of Muellers report... I Stand With Mueller
If you stand with Mueller, then you should stop whining and groping blindly for conclusions that he couldn't find!
As I stated already in this thread, the absence of an underlying crime (collusion) takes all the air out of the obstruction balloon! None of you trump haters has a clue how to respond to my simple observation!
Here we go again... maybe repetition will help!
1. There was no "collusion" or "conspiracy" by trump or his campaign.
2. How do we know? Because Mueller said so!
3. Since there was no underlying crime, Mueller was effectively investigating a non-crime.
4. Logically, you cannot obstruct "justice" by opposing the investigation of a non-crime. To the contrary, justice is best served by halting such a futile and wasteful expenditure of public resources, not by prolonging it!
