Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsmokies
It was just announced that the victims' families have filed a lawsuit on Kyle, the owner of the assault weapon and the city and state that allowed a 17 year old to illegally possess and cause bodily harm including death with an assault rifle. Videos show that law enforcement made no effort to enforce this illegal possession of an assault rifle. Slam dunk
Yes I do say so dah
|
if it was illegal why did the judge dismiss that count? the prosecution knew it was a legal weapon from the start. yet they charged him anyway
rittenhouse can and should sue Biden for calling him a white supremacist. yes Biden. he'll counter sue the families and put them out on the streets.
btw Nick Sandman still has 6 lawsuits ongoing ..
and he already got a 250 MILLION dollar win from CNN
after the lawyer's 30 percent and taxes he's already got about 100 million in da bank!
so you know more than the judge ..
Hours before closing arguments began on Monday, Judge Bruce Schroeder granted a defense motion to toss out the weapons charge. Rittenhouse attorneys Mark Richards and Corey Chirafisi pointed to an exception in the law that they said allows minors to possess shotguns and rifles as long as they’re not short-barreled.
Assistant District Attorney James Kraus argued that the exception renders the state’s prohibition on minors possessing dangerous weapons meaningless. But when he acknowledged that Rittenhouse’s rifle’s barrel was longer than 16 inches, the minimum barrel length allowed under state law, Schroeder dismissed the charge.
To Kenosha-based defense attorney Michael Cicchini, the statute clearly requires a weapon to be short-barreled to apply, and the judge made the right call.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...harge-81285031
thank you valued poster
