The new hatemongers

[Guest040616]

Lama, don't ask the question if you don't want to know the answer!

[shanm]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

I bet you pick the cotton out of your prescription bottles as well.

Fucking racists

Pffffffffftt you just got owned DaliIdiot.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

I bet you pick the cotton out of your prescription bottles as well.

Uhhhh, my prescription bottles do not have cotton in them.

[novacain]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Someone stand up and defend this gay pride parade.

Ok Judy,
Besides the fact that it offends your delicate sensibilities, is there a law against it?
If during that parade they broke any of the cities obscenity laws, they should have been sited and those citations should factor into them being granted permission to have the parade in the future.
Do you and others like you not have the right to hold a "Straight Pride" parade?
Does anyone or any law make you attend the Gay Pride parade?
If you want to be pissed at someone cause you had to see it..................
Be pissed at your boys at www.breitbart.com they were the ones that posted the pic's of it that offended your delicate sensibilities.
I'll defend your right not to have to see it same as I'll defend their right to have the parade.

[novacain]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

perhaps you were lashing out unreasonably without having reviewed the record. . the statement was being made that gays should be treated equally, I was responding to that, so the valid inference was that there was such a claim that gays didn't previously have equal rights

thank you, however, for agreeing with me

I see, so what you are saying is:
Gays had the right to marry.............. just not the right to choose WHO they wanted to marry. Correct me if I'm wrong but you have the RIGHT to choose WHO you want to marry, so tell me again how it was equal?

[novacain]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

This is Novie's problem. Someone said the truth and he can't handle it. So he makes what I assume is an insult and moves on in blissful stupidity thinking he won something.

Judy, I guess you missed where I agreed with him, that they did indeed have that right. Just cause it was true didn't make it any less of an idiotic argument or him an idiot for trying to make it. You really need to learn to read, it would make this much more of a challenge.

[TheDaliLama]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Uhhhh, my prescription bottles do not have cotton in them.

Oh that's right....you lost the string to your Tampon.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Oh that's right....you lost the string to your Tampon.

I will accept the lack of substance from the above referenced post, as an open admission that Lama lost the argument.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

The most honest three words your sorry fucking ass has ever uttered on these boards. You don't know. If you think that those photos represent all homosexuals, you're as stupid as you are ugly.

Nice of you to admit that you're a peter puffer - AGAIN !!! Out And Proud, right woomby / undercunt / rusty balloon knot / wanna-be jalapeno sucker !!! You're just upset that neither you or shammy can wear a white dress and pull it off like your fag buddy in the pics !! Bet you got one of those dick-shaped drink holders for yourself and shammy to celebrate your upCUMing "union" . Next you'll be looking for a jalapeno shaped one to add to your collection .

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by novacain

Ok Judy,
Besides the fact that it offends your delicate sensibilities, is there a law against it?
If during that parade they broke any of the cities obscenity laws, they should have been sited and those citations should factor into them being granted permission to have the parade in the future.
Do you and others like you not have the right to hold a "Straight Pride" parade?
Does anyone or any law make you attend the Gay Pride parade?
If you want to be pissed at someone cause you had to see it..................
Be pissed at your boys at www.breitbart.com they were the ones that posted the pic's of it that offended your delicate sensibilities.
I'll defend your right not to have to see it same as I'll defend their right to have the parade.

Another demonstration of libtard logic.
Do you really think that anyone is going to arrest anyone in a parade where even some of the cops are dancing and grinding. Hell, they're happy that no one is shooting at them right now.

I have always said that libs can't see the line that should be crossed and this is a perfect example. Here is a protest of the 1950s

Everyone is dressed, everyone is acting in a manner to not offend, this is all about civil rights and not how they're acting. This worked to convince people around the country watching it on TV that civil rights were the right thing to do.

This is a parade today;


Besides being in color, this is one of the tamest gay pride parades from LAST YEAR in Canada. Their behavior and not their civil rights becomes the focal point. Like I said, this is one of the tamest photos.

[slingblade]

"The greatest evidence of authentic good will...is the way we treat people with whom we passionately disagree."

"Walking down Broadway and 22nd St just now, I ran into gay marriage parade. Two men walked by and spat on me. Oh well... I deserve worse."

"The two men who spat on me are probably very good man caught up in excitement and past resentment. Most in that parade would not do that."



Those are quotes from the Priest that was spit on.

Maybe you should have read those before you posted this. Then again that would not be the MO of a gay basher. Even th Priest said that it was not typical of gays to act in that way.

Maybe it was some closet Reagan-heads that had infiltrated the pride.

[novacain]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Another demonstration of libtard logic.
Do you really think that anyone is going to arrest anyone in a parade where even some of the cops are dancing and grinding. Hell, they're happy that no one is shooting at them right now.

I have always said that libs can't see the line that should be crossed and this is a perfect example. Here is a protest of the 1950s

Everyone is dressed, everyone is acting in a manner to not offend, this is all about civil rights and not how they're acting. This worked to convince people around the country watching it on TV that civil rights were the right thing to do.

This is a parade today;


Besides being in color, this is one of the tamest gay pride parades from LAST YEAR in Canada. Their behavior and not their civil rights becomes the focal point. Like I said, this is one of the tamest photos.

Ok Judy, this is really the argument you want to make of this, you truly do suck at this.

Ok that first picture as you stated is of a PROTEST
protest: noun
1. a statement or action expressing disapproval of or objection to something.
2. a written declaration, typically by a notary public, that a bill has been presented and payment or acceptance refused.
verb
1. express an objection to what someone has said or done.
2. declare (something) firmly and emphatically in the face of stated or implied doubt or in response to an accusation.

Now, in the second picture you clearly state that as being of a parade, a gay rights parade but still a PARADE
parade: noun
1. a public procession, especially one celebrating a special day or event and including marching bands and floats
2. a parade ground.
verb
1. walk or march in public in a formal procession or in an ostentatious or attention-seeking way.

Now, would you like to try again or are you done having your ass handed to you by little old me?

"drops mic, walks off stage"

edited to add: that first line of your rant, I did indeed ignore it based on the sheer stupidity of the statement. Now if you'd really like me to address it, I can and will, but I figured you might need some time to heal from the ass kicking over protest versus parade.

[JD Barleycorn]

I'm actually surprised that you caught that. Maybe COG but not you. Of course you now want to argue about protests, demonstrations, rallies, parades, and celebrations.

Here is a typical celebration in the inner city:

The 1984 World Series victory of Detroit.

This is a protest;

A Tea Party protest 2010, Washington DC

This is a parade;

This is a STRAIGHT PRIDE parade.

This is a rally;

Civil rights rally

and this is a demonstation;


I thought these last two deserve to go together. Dignity for me but not for thee.

[novacain]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I'm actually surprised that you caught that. Maybe COG but not you. Of course you now want to argue about protests, demonstrations, rallies, parades, and celebrations.

Here is a typical celebration in the inner city:

The 1984 World Series victory of Detroit.

This is a protest;

A Tea Party protest 2010, Washington DC

This is a parade;

This is a STRAIGHT PRIDE parade.

This is a rally;

Civil rights rally

and this is a demonstation;


I thought these last two deserve to go together. Dignity for me but not for thee.

No Judy, I don't want to argue those, YOU do. You were the one that tried to compare a parade to a protest when you had no rebuttal to my defending the gay pride parade, which YOU threw down the challenge to do so.
See Judy you're spin tactics, which you are known for doing, don't work with me as I can stay on point. Seems either you can't cause you have no point, or you flat can't remember the point............. Here I'll remind you with your own words from you first post....

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Gay men spit on Catholic priest during "gay pride parade".

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/29/rainbow-of-hate-catholic-priest-reports-being-spit-on-at-gay-marriage-parade/

Just remember who the Brown Shirts were and what so many of them believed in...

See the part in red, see the last word there.......... PARADE.......... that's what this was about, it wasn't about a protest, a celebration, a rally or even a damn demonstration. Do I need to post the definitions of all those words so you can see the difference and not get them all confused as you have here? Maybe that was the plan, toss all those into the mix in the hopes I'd lose sight of the topic and you could correct me and claim a victory.
Is stepping in your own shit a talent you developed or does it just come natural.

Judy, if you only have the skills to play checkers................ please for your sake quit fucking trying to play chess!

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by novacain

No Judy, I don't want to argue those, YOU do. You were the one that tried to compare a parade to a protest when you had no rebuttal to my defending the gay pride parade, which YOU threw down the challenge to do so.
See Judy you're spin tactics, which you are known for doing, don't work with me as I can stay on point. Seems either you can't cause you have no point, or you flat can't remember the point............. Here I'll remind you with your own words from you first post....


See the part in red, see the last word there.......... PARADE.......... that's what this was about, it wasn't about a protest, a celebration, a rally or even a damn demonstration. Do I need to post the definitions of all those words so you can see the difference and not get them all confused as you have here? Maybe that was the plan, toss all those into the mix in the hopes I'd lose sight of the topic and you could correct me and claim a victory.
Is stepping in your own shit a talent you developed or does it just come natural.

Judy, if you only have the skills to play checkers................ please for your sake quit fucking trying to play chess!

Since this is my thread, point is where I say it is but be that as it may you'll still trying to argue semantics I see. My OP was about two gay men (hereafter referred to as faggots) who spat on a uniformed clergymen. Why did they do that? Because he was catholic? Because he was a clergymen? Because he was a FOX news contributor? With all the demonization by the left against the church, authority figures, and FOX news any of the three could be correct. The question is, what's next. I'll tell you...

The left will start going after organized religion using whatever pretext they have. Right now it is "gay pride" and the target is the catholic church. Later it will be something else and maybe the Mormons or Baptist even though the only "religion" that is completely against gay people is Islam.

Last night on O'Reilly they had a gay woman on who represented some gay rights organization. She was asked about problems with the church and gay marriage since the SCOTUS did not make gay marriage legal but it did overturn state attempts to define what marriage was. She said that they had no problem with churches or religions who opposed gay marriage. Sounds nice doesn't it. Then the father asked if she supported even the tax exempt churches....she hestitated slightly and then said that if any church is getting money from the government (a liberal concept that if you get a tax credit then you are getting federal money) is of course going to have to OBEY federal law which includes accepting gay marriage. She was exposed as a liar, a bigot, and an operative with an unnamed agenda.