Question for the Gents? And the Ladies?

[Wiley64]

Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe

Nobody is attacking anyone stop being a WK & let the providers discuss the issue at hand..

I don't even know slayde I have no dogs in this hunt. Im an equal opportunity asshole. I treat all with respect and expect all to do the same. The op asked a question and I as well as others have no idea what was happening in the background. The coed area is for adult discussions and as such you discuss things like adults. If you choose to be rude to others then you shall be treated appropriately. If you have issues with someone you should take those discussions privately.

[Guest021217]

Originally Posted by Wiley64

I don't even know slayde I have no dogs in this hunt. Im an equal opportunity asshole. I treat all with respect and expect all to do the same. The op asked a question and I as well as others have no idea what was happening in the background. The coed area is for adult discussions and as such you discuss things like adults. If you choose to be rude to others then you shall be treated appropriately. If you have issues with someone you should take those discussions privately.

They were discussing if you don't know what is going on then why even comment on the issue? She wasn't being rude you just took it that way.. The thread that was created pertains to her response what else is there to discuss?

[Wiley64]

I'm not going to argue with you on this. There was rudeness if you want to discuss further then pm.

[Guest123018]

Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe

They were discussing if you don't know what is going on then why even comment on the issue? She wasn't being rude you just took it that way.. The thread that was created pertains to her response what else is there to discuss?

I heart ya DM. Thanks!

[Wiley64]

Keep it on topic

[Guest012418-1]

Now that this thread has died down I will respond accordingly to each so please be patient as I sift through these posts.

[Guest012418-1]

mistyped/wrong placement

[Guest012418-1]

Originally Posted by Seeking ~P

Why don't you tell us since I just asked you for a client reference a couple days ago and you have Ignored me.

Good thing I check all my other resources for screening since you're a flake about providing a simple reference to other providers.


Why don't you let the other providers
know that you ask for references but
you don't provide them for the guys.

Oh, and let the guys know this so
they'll know not to use you as a reference

People never remember all the times you have helped them and they never forget the one time you didn't ... Why don't you tell us about the time before when I DID give you a ref... Apparently you forgot about THAT time in the midst of your overwhelming desire to stir up drama? If I didn't respond to your email or PM it is not b/c I was ignoring you. More likely that I was perhaps busy w/ clients or other life matters that kept me away from me PM's or emails. Regardless you are out of line to assume that I do not provide refs. Since you are using all of your resources then perhaps phone calls or texts could be used to get a faster response. I won't even entertain the 'flake' comment other than to say 'what's understood need not be spoken'.

[Guest012418-1]

Originally Posted by Dickjonesbr

Seeking~P why do you jump down everyone's throats when they make a post?

Thanks

[Guest012418-1]

Originally Posted by MOCHAakaMOCHA

I am 100% reference friendly (giving & receiving) and want to make that disclaimer before I get to my problem with number 2.

It is NOT the responsibility of another provider to keep you safe. That is YOUR job. Reference exchange imo is just good manners and can be nice and helpful.....to a degree (we all know sometimes a client can be great to 1 lady and a dick to the next). But it's a courtesy not a right.
It's tacky if the provider I ask for a ref check from doesn't respond but I don't care because I have other ways to screen .... another ho won't stop my dough lol.

The client should probably also know about the unresponsive provider so he can avoid wasting his time trying to use her in the future (and probably avoid seeing her in the future too).

To clarify....
I never said or insinuated that it was another providers 'responsibility' to keep me safe. However, refs are primarily used which 'assist' in keeping us safe.
Obviously there are times when one does not or cannot respond to a ref request for various reasons.
In my situation, which was the premise for this thread originally, the provider refused the newbie to use her as a ref b/c she was mad that he wasn't seeing her again and therefore, was a refusal to assist the newbie or her fellow provider.

[Guest012418-1]

Originally Posted by Lena Duvall

A jealousy self-alert thread perhaps?

In ways, I do agree with Mocha that a provider doesn't have to respond to a reference request. But I think unless she clearly states that to her clients on the front end before they book a date with her, it is disingenuous and downright disrespectful.

The way I see it, the only reason reference withholding escorts aren't transparent with their clients about the fact that they do not give references and instead wait until the moment he is trying to set up a date with someone else is because they know it may affect the clients decision to even see them at all.

This goes back to the first portion of the (maybe self-snitching ) original post. Why would one who seeks to share space with different providers for the purpose of fulfilling various fantasies want to do so with a jealous and petty client-hoarding-ho who will actively undermine his attempts to branch out and engage with other providers? Who is out here trying to pay good money for possessive behavior?

well said Lena and that is exactly what I witnessed happen... 'Possessive behavior'...
Although I am unclear what is meant by 'self-snitching'?

[Guest012418-1]

Originally Posted by Seeking ~P

Far from Irritated. Just pointing out the fact on Slayde whining about another provider not giving a reference when she doesn't.

Slayde didn't start the threAD In the Powder Room so I wouldn't go to the Powder Room to address her. She started this threAD right here In Coed
so I commented on It here In Coed.

I thought Coed was for discussion. Slayde started this, so I'm discussing as others are ....

If I read her post correctly,
Slayde asked for feedback on thoughts
and to
Please add to ....

Definitely seemed like an attack to me and if I read my post correctly I didn't ask for that... Just sayin!
Stay tuned ... I'll be rewording and reposting to hopefully get actual answers to the questions without it being twisted into 'Slayde's behavior'.

[Guest012418-1]

Originally Posted by Seeking ~P

Huh? What attack?
She admitted her guilt by not responding here through her omission.
I'm not the only one seeing It that way, If she's not gonna
give references that's fine by me but don't start a threAD
about another provider not giving a reference when she doesn't

Omission here has absolutely nothing to do with guilt. Sometimes the best thing to do is 'nothing'.
The others who see it your way only do so after you have twisted it out of context since the thread had nothing to do with another provider giving ME a ref in the first place.
You can't play cards with a half a deck!
Perhaps understanding all the facts first....

[jl11]

Yeah go ahead Slayde. I'm not taking sides, but I find it pathetic when idiots try to stand on a pedestal on a hooker forum. Some people just never grow up, and fuck them royally for stirring pots.
And to answer your question I hobby bc of the variety, and bc this is cheaper than bedding civilian women of most of the calibers that I choose. Thanks for doing what you do you.

[Guest012418-1]

Originally Posted by OldGent

So ~P highlights hypocritical behavior and it's an attack? And the folks that back her up are Attacking too? It's funny how when someone on the board has nothing to back up their point they resort to general whining. Very intelligent and mature. Facts are facts jack.

Ahhh and a biased comment we have here....
The only thing that has been highlighted here is ignorance of the facts.... Jack.
Seems everyone has gotten sucked into this trend of playing cards with a half a deck.... Smh?!?!?