Quote:
Originally Posted by pyramider
I bet they would if taint photos were included.
l4b, bfc does not seem to understand if the rough play is too rough that the participants have the right to tap out and not have to endure assault.
|
No. Never said that. Never implied that. The difference between me and some of you others is that I think she should have said no upfront and not let him face fucked her roughly. It's a lot easier to say no when a guy isn't ramming his dick down your throat.
What I said was: "You two act like a lady has no right to refuse a customer request...that her only recourse is to complain afterwards if she doesn't like it. That's bullshit. She should feel free to say no upfront if the activity is out of her comfort zone."
Unlike you, I'm not trying to determine how much rough face fucking is appropriate for a lady to endure. Unlike you, I'm not saying she should endure it until it reaches the level of assault and then tap out. I'm saying ladies should try to avoid a situation where they feel they're being assaulted by getting a better understanding of what the guy means by rough before he starts in her. As I said earlier: "If the request is vague, ask him to clarify. Get the information you need to make a decision. Don't just say yes and hope for the best."
I lady can always say no and tap out. The OP followed your approach and endured as much as she could before tapping out and throwing him out. I'm guessing she wishes she would have just said no upfront and had a normal session, because it sure doesn't seem that your approach worked out for her.
And just to be clear, I was not at the session. I don't how rough the guy got. I'm talking in general.
