Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

CJ7 · 02-19-2012, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

And what is this you just posted? Is this post of yours supposed to represent a strong and credible argument? You failed!

You've offered nothing but liberal-opinionated drivel, and your every attempt to substantiate your argument as more than you 'opinion' has failed. Intellectual weakness and failure is your forté.

and youre still deflecting, totally incapable of making any intelligent rebuttal other than I failed ..

well, at least 2 goobers on the panel think youre Einstein ... three if you count yourself

CJ7 · 02-19-2012, 02:33 PM

Better yet IB lets cut to the chase and delve into the crux of this ...

do you, or do you not, think our legislators should consult with the religious sector prior to passing laws in this country?

I B Hankering · 02-19-2012, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

and youre still deflecting, totally incapable of making any intelligent rebuttal other than I failed ..

well, at least 2 goobers on the panel think youre Einstein ... three if you count yourself

The argument has been made. In fact you've unwittingly accepted the facts. Your assertion that Catholics might merely go to confession and be absolved of the sin forced upon them by Obamacare is your admission that Obamacare does infringe on First Amendment rights. Nothing else needs to be said.

CJ7 · 02-19-2012, 02:43 PM

do you, or do you not, think our legislators should consult with the religious sector prior to passing laws in this country?

yes or no, Einstein?

Doove · 02-19-2012, 02:53 PM

I wonder which side these first amendment folk came down on the Ground Zero Mosque debate.

I B Hankering · 02-19-2012, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

do you, or do you not, think our legislators should consult with the religious sector prior to passing laws in this country?

yes or no, Einstein?

And how is that question relevant to this discussion?

CJ7 · 02-19-2012, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

And how is that question relevant to this discussion?

yes or no, Einstein?

I B Hankering · 02-19-2012, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

yes or no, Einstein?

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...0&postcount=51

CJ7 · 02-19-2012, 04:13 PM

yes or no Einstein?

I B Hankering · 02-19-2012, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

yes or no Einstein?

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...0&postcount= 51

CJ7 · 02-19-2012, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...0&postcount= 51

apparently a simple yes or no question is waaaaaay over your head, and out of the question to get an answer

anserwing a question with a question is freshman at best.

Kudos Einstein.

Youre dismissed.

I B Hankering · 02-19-2012, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

apparently a simple yes or no question is waaaaaay over your head, and out of the question to get an answer

anserwing a question with a question is freshman at best.

Kudos Einstein.

Youre dismissed.

Typical liberal ploy: "Do as I say not as I do." Once again you have demonstrated that you are an inveterate hypocrite.

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...0&postcount= 51

CJ7 · 02-19-2012, 05:56 PM

dont feel bad IB, JD didnt answer the question either. He was smart enough to take his ball and go play elswhere ... you? not so much.

Hint; everyone with an IQ above a door knob knows exactly why you refuse to answer.

ROFLMFTAO

I B Hankering · 02-19-2012, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

dont feel bad IB, JD didnt answer the question either. He was smart enough to take his ball and go play elswhere ... you? not so much.

Hint; everyone with an IQ above a door knob knows exactly why you refuse to answer.

The onus is on you, otherwise you are still a hypocrite.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

ROFLMFTAO

Kool Aid drunk and rolling on the floor again? Tsk, tsk, tsk. When will you ever grow up?

Sidewinder · 02-19-2012, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guilty Pleasures

A lot of you are missing one really important thing on making sure women have access to contraceptives, it is a health issue. I say this because ovarian cysts are controlled and prevented by taking contraceptives. There are also many other health issues where contraceptives are used to ameliorate pain associated with endometriosis and shrink up endometrial tissues. Not too mention women who suffer from hormonal imbalances. Contraceptive / Birth Control pills are used for more than just simply birth control. No one has the right to deny a woman access to this type treatment simply because they think "well its against my religious beliefs, therefore I can deny her access". I have to take contraceptives because of painful cysts on my ovaries and also to help with perimenopausal symptoms. Did anyone see this gals story? (which is all too common btw). She was denied the right to testify in that panel. Her story about her friend is a very common one for a lot of young women today. Sandro Fluke Video

Nobody is denying women access to those meds. They're just saying that they will not pay for them.

There is nothing whatsoever stopping the Liberals from pulling out their checkbooks and setting up a charitable foundation to pay for contraceptives for those women whose health insurance refuses to pay for them, except for their oft-demonstrated extreme aversion to using Their Own Money to do anything.

(Yes, I'm being a little bit nasty nasty. It's been an unpleasant last few weeks.)