so, full bush, shaved, or landing strip..

[BLM69]

Bald pussy or nothing!

[Unique_Carpenter]

Moderately trimmed, landing strip, or bare. Depends on the gal.

Unless it's a redhead.
She should only have a minor trim, cause she knows that guys enjoy redheads, and the bush proves it.

[O'Mike]

She needs to be well groomed, in all aspects..........






.

[BLM69]

I make my whores shave bald, I carry all the essentials so there's no excuses

[Gangolf]

During doggy, especially, I like it when her bush tickles my balls. I came of age in the Seventies, when all red-blooded young men wanted to see bits of bush poking from under the skimpy bikinis of the time. If a thin line of hair extended from her bush, up her belly, to her navel, so much the better. At the beach or lake, whether skinny-dipping, or, with the bush protruding from under a bikini, water dripping or running from strands of pubic hair is visual gold. So, especially if doggy is on the agenda, I like a full bush.

Yes, skinny-dipping was quite trendy, back then. I have considered the cost and feasibility of having a women spend a day at a suitable swimmin’ hole with me, to relive memories of what I did with several girlfriends, during the eleven years between my first and second/current marriages. All else being equal, I would rather that this woman be bushy, because those girlfriends were bushy.

There is the novelty factor. My SO is naturally not-very-bushy. Not that we still have a sex life, anyway, but, for the past 2+ decades, a bush has been exotic.

If I am going to perform anything oral, however, on a woman who may not have thoroughly showered, after having recently been with another man, I would rather that she be shaved/waxed. A “baby wipe” or towelette clean-up is of limited effectiveness when there is hair present.

[pxmcc]

hilarious sir..

although hobbying i prefer full shaved, i did have an interesting full bush experience. i signed off on a doubles session back in the backpage days. the leader gal was a bitch who almost ruined the session, but her doubles partner was practically a civvie with a full bush. i felt like we met on aisle 7 at fiesta and we immediately went to my place to fuck each other's brains outs. good times..

i saved her # and she became one of my long-term utrs. never asked her to shave cause she was so hot, i gave her the bfe even with her copious bush lol..

Originally Posted by Gangolf

During doggy, especially, I like it when her bush tickles my balls. I came of age in the Seventies, when all red-blooded young men wanted to see bits of bush poking from under the skimpy bikinis of the time. If a thin line of hair extended from her bush, up her belly, to her navel, so much the better. At the beach or lake, whether skinny-dipping, or, with the bush protruding from under a bikini, water dripping or running from strands of pubic hair is visual gold. So, especially if doggy is on the agenda, I like a full bush.

Yes, skinny-dipping was quite trendy, back then. I have considered the cost and feasibility of having a women spend a day at a suitable swimmin’ hole with me, to relive memories of what I did with several girlfriends, during the eleven years between my first and second/current marriages. All else being equal, I would rather that this woman be bushy, because those girlfriends were bushy.

There is the novelty factor. My SO is naturally not-very-bushy. Not that we still have a sex life, anyway, but, for the past 2+ decades, a bush has been exotic.

If I am going to perform anything oral, however, on a woman who may not have thoroughly showered, after having recently been with another man, I would rather that she be shaved/waxed. A “baby wipe” or towelette clean-up is of limited effectiveness when there is hair present.

[O'Mike]

Originally Posted by Gangolf

.............. I have considered the cost and feasibility of having a women spend a day at a suitable swimmin’ hole with me, to relive memories of what I did with several girlfriends,..............

Well that time of year is back in Texas. Think about a day at Emerald Lakes, just north of the big Bush airport in Porter. $50 will get you and a friend in for the day. Not the same thrill of getting caught you can get elsewhere, but not a chance of a getting a criminal charge either.


Schedule a couple of hours with an independent, rent a small cabin you can play in between trips to the pool or lake.








.

[Gangolf]

Originally Posted by O'Mike

Well that time of year is back in Texas. Think about a day at Emerald Lakes, just north of the big Bush airport in Porter. $50 will get you and a friend in for the day. Not the same thrill of getting caught you can get elsewhere, but not a chance of a getting a criminal charge either.


Schedule a couple of hours with an independent, rent a small cabin you can play in between trips to the pool or lake.








.

Thanks for the recommendation. Yes, this is a safe place to be nude, in public. Your plan would certainly be fun.

I was thinking more like the stretch of beach, between High Island and Sabine Pass, where it is usually remote enough to be at a sufficient distance to go full tilt, out in the open, especially if another set of eyes is available, to look for approaching vehicles. I have been communicating on-line, with a couple who like to have FS on this stretch of beach, but, they are not “swingers,” simply a bit exhibitionist, so, I would need to find a willing woman, provider or civilian, to complete a double date.

In the past, I had three wild-child girlfriends who loved this stretch of beach, which has a history of being a bare-ass beach, for decades. Two of them actually liked initiating “risky oral” in amazingly public locations, and at least one of them would probably have done FS, in the presence of like-minded folks, judging by the way she would leave her bare ass out in the open, up in the air, while her head and face were only slightly concealed, during BBBJ. (If I remember correctly, her head being slightly concealed was more because I was too chicken to let the “point of contact” be completely in the open.)