Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70831
biomed163764
Yssup Rider61304
gman4453377
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48840
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37431
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2019, 01:07 PM   #46
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whisky_1 View Post
The FBI was not spying on Trump. The FBI monitors hostile counter-intelligence activities like Russia. When members of the Trump campaign met with Russian diplomats they became visible on the FBI radar. Had they not met with the Russians and/or reported the engagement accurately it would have been a nothing burger instead of chaos.

why didn't the FBI inform Trump that he was being spied by the Russians?


why did NSA director Admiral Mike Rogers warn Trump that he was being surveilled by FBI 2 weeks after the election?


Rogers obviously thought there was something dodgy about that operation.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2019, 01:30 PM   #47
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whisky_1 View Post
The FBI was not spying on Trump. The FBI monitors hostile counter-intelligence activities like Russia. When members of the Trump campaign met with Russian diplomats they became visible on the FBI radar. Had they not met with the Russians and/or reported the engagement accurately it would have been a nothing burger instead of chaos.
The FISA warrants obtained by Comey, McCabe, etc., were for the purpose of SPYING on Team Trump. Documented fact!
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2019, 03:21 PM   #48
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whisky_1 View Post
Trump and members of his campaigned (sic) were not spied on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whisky_1 View Post
The FBI was not spying on Trump.
Riiiight!

And Nixon's "plumbers" never tried to spy on the McGovern campaign either! They were just upgrading the phone system when they were discovered at the DNC headquarters in the Watergate on June 17, 1972!

By the way, whisky, have you told the Attorney General yet? He needs to be straightened out by someone with your superior knowledge and information! (dripping sarcasm alert!)

Hmmmm.... who should we believe? Barr or some noob on a hooker board?

Tough call!


lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2019, 03:45 PM   #49
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whisky_1 View Post
On the other hand, foreign policy is the exclusive domain of a sitting President... Consequently, guarded and undisclosed contact with hostile foreign diplomats... could possibly rise to the level of treason.
Have you told John Kerry yet?

Oh wait!! I forgot... your "rules" only apply to Republicans, right?

You are not only wrong when it comes to an incoming administration contacting foreign officials (something that is routine whenever the White House changes hands), but you are also hypocritical about what constitutes treason.

"...anyone who was outraged about Flynn’s activity, which was hardly unusual for a key member of an incoming administration, but remains silent about Kerry is not only hypocritical but winking at efforts to aid a hostile foreign power gain an advantage against an American government that is rightly concerned about its criminal behavior and intentions."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...eal-collusion/
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2019, 05:54 PM   #50
Hotrod511
Valued Poster
 
Hotrod511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 9, 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 2,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Riiiight!

And Nixon's "plumbers" never tried to spy on the McGovern campaign either! They were just upgrading the phone system when they were discovered at the DNC headquarters in the Watergate on June 17, 1972!

By the way, whisky, have you told the Attorney General yet? He needs to be straightened out by someone with your superior knowledge and information! (dripping sarcasm alert!)

Hmmmm.... who should we believe? Barr or some noob on a hooker board?

Tough call!




Hotrod511 is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2019, 06:36 PM   #51
agrarian
Gaining Momentum
 
Join Date: Feb 12, 2019
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 88
Default

It makes complete sense that we were watching the Russians during the campaign, and when that surveillance revealed Russian interactions with the Trump campaign there was concern. That's my take on this.

How can we forget that President Trump lied when asked about the meeting with the Russians in Trump Tower? How can any of us forget the President standing on Air Force One and looking straight at a camera and lying about that meeting? He tried to correct course several times over the next several days. The result was one lie after another. President Trump also lied about his business dealings with the Russians. He said he had none. That was a lie. President Trump met privately with Putin for over one hour. Not good behavior, when Russian rumors are flying about. Not good behavior under the best of circumstances. What about Trump Campaign manager Manafort working to change the GOP platform regarding Russian sanctions? What about President Trump saying he believed Putin, when Putin said Russia did nothing regarding disrupting information flow and election-related information? President Trump said he preferred the word of Putin to the word of our own security officials. Hmmm. I can understand being skeptical of our own security officials, but embracing Putin's word under those circumstances?

I do not trust Putin. Not for a single second. He is not a friend of our nation or of free enterprise or democracy. Deal with him as an adversary, not as a friend or as a business partner. It is naïve not to understand that Putin and Russia sought and seek to disrupt our democratic society by circulating rumors and lies in social media and other means. Putin is a deceitful, murderous, greedy fiend.
agrarian is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2019, 08:02 PM   #52
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by agrarian View Post
It makes complete sense that we were watching the Russians during the campaign, and when that surveillance revealed Russian interactions with the Trump campaign there was concern. That's my take on this.

How can we forget that President Trump lied when asked about the meeting with the Russians in Trump Tower? How can any of us forget the President standing on Air Force One and looking straight at a camera and lying about that meeting? He tried to correct course several times over the next several days. The result was one lie after another. President Trump also lied about his business dealings with the Russians. He said he had none. That was a lie. President Trump met privately with Putin for over one hour. Not good behavior, when Russian rumors are flying about. Not good behavior under the best of circumstances. What about Trump Campaign manager Manafort working to change the GOP platform regarding Russian sanctions? What about President Trump saying he believed Putin, when Putin said Russia did nothing regarding disrupting information flow and election-related information? President Trump said he preferred the word of Putin to the word of our own security officials. Hmmm. I can understand being skeptical of our own security officials, but embracing Putin's word under those circumstances?

I do not trust Putin. Not for a single second. He is not a friend of our nation or of free enterprise or democracy. Deal with him as an adversary, not as a friend or as a business partner. It is naïve not to understand that Putin and Russia sought and seek to disrupt our democratic society by circulating rumors and lies in social media and other means. Putin is a deceitful, murderous, greedy fiend.
Your ilk continues to ignore that the Russian in the Tower meeting were associates of FusionGPS in the employ of hildebeest.

YOUR RUSSIANS WERE FIRST AND FOREMOST CLINTONITES seeking to entrap Team Trump!

Meanwhile, Adam Shiffty is on tape speaking with actual Russians trying to dig up dirt on Trump.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2019, 08:41 PM   #53
Whisky_1
Valued Poster
 
Whisky_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2, 2019
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
And they should, and leave their political opponents alone.

The SCOTUS opinions are full of cases opposing efforts to justify searches by LE based on fabricated facts and spurious claims whether a court order is issued or not .... if you desire to review some of them they will most likely be discovered using the search term ...

....... "pretextual" .........

What the following investigation will demonstrate is these LE frauds fabricated bullshit, floated it to the media, and then used the media reports based on "anonymous sources" that were protected by the alleged 1st amendment as a "pretext" to establish probable cause for the court to sign an order.

Now ... if they did that to your UTR p4p fuck ... you'd be all up in arms and indignant ... wouldn't you????

But since the LiberalSocialistAntiTrumpers don't like Trump, in THEIR weak minds it's "ok"!
Most host countries intelligence communities closely watch the Consulate and Diplomatic offices of foreign nations to prevent political, military and corporate espionage. We are always watching known Russian and Chinese counter-intelligence operatives in the US. I recommend you research the FISA court's duties and responsibilities which parallel the usually federal civil and criminal courts in matters of national security. Your context is wrong and not applicable. The context is more like Federal LE lawfully assessing suspicious activities by known spies when members of the 45's campaign get caught responding to the Russian invite to discuss undermining the General Election and later get caught lying about contact with the Russians on their security clearence applications and statements to the FBI. Again, foreign policy is the exclusive domain of a sitting President and since 45 had not yet assumed office there could be not no valid reasons for 45 or members of his campaign to meet with Russian diplomats and spies and then lie about it. But weak minded individuals seem not to care about the US Constitution, the rule of law, obstruction of justice and abuses of office let alone treason unless it conveniently supports their delusional far right political narrative.
Whisky_1 is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2019, 11:40 PM   #54
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default It's a hildebeest and Odumbo lie that any of this actually had anything to do with Russia

“Based on what you’ve [Papadopoulos] told us, I’m trying to figure out why one of what has become the highest-profile investigations in U.S. history alleging collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government centered around you, a 28-year-old campaign adviser on the job for about a month who, to this day, has never been to Russia, and, to this day, has never knowingly met a member of the Russian government.” Rep. John Ratcliffe, Texas Republican.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 04-15-2019, 12:23 AM   #55
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by agrarian View Post
What about Trump Campaign manager Manafort working to change the GOP platform regarding Russian sanctions?
What about it? I've already quashed this false liberal talking point multiple times, yet people like you keep repeating it. Again. And again. And again.

You believe the phony talking points you are spoon-fed by the DNC because you are too lazy to fact-check them.

Here's what I posted 10 months ago. Read and learn!


Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Here are the FACTS regarding that 2016 GOP platform change on Ukraine. I'm sick and tired of seeing your falsehood repeated.

The final, Trump-approved passage read: "We support maintaining and, if warranted, increasing sanctions, together with our allies, against Russia unless and until Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity are fully restored. We also support providing appropriate assistance to the armed forces of Ukraine and greater coordination with NATO defense planning." That was the amendment the committee approved.

This language is significantly stronger than the comparable plank in the 2016 Dimotard platform, which said nothing about US sanctions or providing lethal aid to Ukraine's armed forces.

Here's the full story.... Read it and learn!

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/b...orm-and-russia

Of course, actions speak louder than words, right?

Are you even aware of the FACT that Trump has approved the actual sale of lethal weapons to Ukraine, including 210 Javelin anti-tank missiles? (Google it.) That's something odumbo declined to do. Sorry if it doesn't fit into your phony Trump-Putin collusion narrative.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 04-15-2019, 12:31 AM   #56
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whisky_1 View Post
Again, foreign policy is the exclusive domain of a sitting President and since 45 had not yet assumed office there could be not no valid reasons for 45 or members of his campaign to meet with Russian diplomats...
Again, you are dead wrong. I already refuted you on this point in my post #49 above. Officials of incoming administrations routinely meet with foreign diplomats in the weeks prior to inauguration.

Why do you repeat the same nonsense? Do you think saying it over and over again will somehow make it correct?
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 04-15-2019, 12:47 AM   #57
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whisky_1 View Post
...when members of the 45's campaign get caught responding to the Russian invite to discuss undermining the General Election...
Oh my! So now you're claiming that the act of seeking dirt on your opponent is somehow tantamount to "undermining the General Election"?

Then I guess you will agree that hildebeest was "undermining the General Election" when she colluded with ABC and NBC to release the Access Hollywood tape 3 weeks prior to November 8, 2016?

And how about hildebeest colluding with Ukrainians to disclose alleged payments to Paul Manafort that resulted in trump firing him as campaign manager in August 2016?

Was that "undermining the General Election"?
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 04-15-2019, 12:53 AM   #58
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by agrarian View Post
I do not trust Putin. Not for a single second. He is not a friend of our nation or of free enterprise or democracy. Deal with him as an adversary, not as a friend or as a business partner. It is naïve not to understand that Putin and Russia sought and seek to disrupt our democratic society by circulating rumors and lies in social media and other means. Putin is a deceitful, murderous, greedy fiend.
Awww come on! Don't be such a hard-ass! You never know... you might have more flexibility after the election! Was odumbo being "naive"?





lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 04-15-2019, 02:58 AM   #59
Whisky_1
Valued Poster
 
Whisky_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2, 2019
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
actually the Russians did but spying wasn't their aim, disruption of the election campaigns was their goal. what they did was disruptive.
That is exactly what hostile counter-intelligence initiatives do with new information-disrupt! Judging by the posts in the political forum I would say the Russian initiative has reached fruition.
Whisky_1 is offline   Quote
Old 04-15-2019, 03:08 AM   #60
Whisky_1
Valued Poster
 
Whisky_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2, 2019
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Oh my! So now you're claiming that the act of seeking dirt on your opponent is somehow tantamount to "undermining the General Election"?

Then I guess you will agree that hildebeest was "undermining the General Election" when she colluded with ABC and NBC to release the Access Hollywood tape 3 weeks prior to November 8, 2016?

And how about hildebeest colluding with Ukrainians to disclose alleged payments to Paul Manafort that resulted in trump firing him as campaign manager in August 2016?

Was that "undermining the General Election"?
You ignore the obvious. Manaford is a incarcerated felon while Mrs Clinton is not. How about that!
Whisky_1 is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved