Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 401
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70825
biomed163710
Yssup Rider61274
gman4453363
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48821
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37418
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2012, 10:21 AM   #31
acp5762
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Feb 8, 2011
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 3,979
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wellendowed1911 View Post
If you ask the Repugs this will happen if romney wins:
!) Gas will be $2 a gallon
2) United States will be drilling it's own oil and large capacity that we won't even need Oil from the middle eastern.
3) Everyone will have great high paying jobs due extension of Bush tax cuts and trickle down economics
4) The great business man that Romney is - he will have UE rate at an all time low because he knows how to create jobs- even though when he was Governor his state was near the bottom in job creation but if he is over 50 states somehow he will bring UE to historic lows.

It really tickles me that people like WW. Joe Bloe and IIFFOFRDB really think their lives are going to be drastically changed LMFAo
I don't know about all that. What I do know is, if Romney is elected we won't have a muslim president trying to pose as an American, and thats at least a positive step in the right direction.
acp5762 is offline   Quote
Old 08-31-2012, 11:02 AM   #32
Fast Gunn
Valued Poster
 
Fast Gunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 7, 2010
Location: two steps ahead of the posse.
Posts: 5,356
Encounters: 31
Exclamation Business Approach

If Mitt Romney became President and God forbid such a nightmare being inflicted on this country, he would take the only approach he knows.

He would look at the USA as a business and after looking at the balance sheet, decide to sell off those states that are not performing as well as they should.

. . . He would probably sell California to Mexico! Since California is usually a blue state, he would probably even take an extra measure of satisfaction in that sale too!


Fast Gunn is offline   Quote
Old 08-31-2012, 12:19 PM   #33
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexTushHog View Post
Nothing wrong with NAFTA. There are many, many blue-collar workers who would disagree with you.

Repealing Glass-Stegall was a mistake in my judgement. I heard President Clinton speak at a fundraiser earlier this year where he defended the repeal and faulted Bush for cutting back on post repeal regulation, which is true enough, so far as it goes. But if you ave to rely on good regulation, then it's just better to outlaw it as good regulation is never guaranteed.
"Heard"??? Why don't you cite a single instance of "post regulation repeal" that was more devastating than repealing Glass-Stegall.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 08-31-2012, 01:16 PM   #34
daty/o
Valued Poster
 
daty/o's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2010
Location: Grapevine
Posts: 4,794
Encounters: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by acp5762 View Post
I don't know about all that. What I do know is, if Romney is elected we won't have a muslim president trying to pose as an American, and thats at least a positive step in the right direction.
Proof that Ron White is correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Gunn View Post
If Mitt Romney became President and God forbid such a nightmare being inflicted on this country, he would take the only approach he knows.

He would look at the USA as a business and after looking at the balance sheet, decide to sell off those states that are not performing as well as they should.

Actually Fast Gunn, America is a business; but we need someone a whole lot smarter than Romney to run it. And with the GOP, the trickle down illusion will only result in more wealth at the top. Then we will have to manufacture another war.
daty/o is offline   Quote
Old 08-31-2012, 07:07 PM   #35
Fast Gunn
Valued Poster
 
Fast Gunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 7, 2010
Location: two steps ahead of the posse.
Posts: 5,356
Encounters: 31
Exclamation Larger Vision

I have to disagree with you on this point. America is not a business, but I do agree with you about Romney's limitations.

American is a country.

Business has only one measure of success and that is making money. Business tends to be ruthless and cut-throat, but a country needs compassion.

A successful country needs to operate on a larger vision than a business.

. . . A successful country needs to foster an environment where business can prosper, but it goes beyond that. It must nourish its people, make them proud to be citizens and help them to be productive and return the favor. That is the cycle that keeps a country growing.



Quote:
Originally Posted by daty/o View Post
Proof that Ron White is correct.



Actually Fast Gunn, America is a business; but we need someone a whole lot smarter than Romney to run it. And with the GOP, the trickle down illusion will only result in more wealth at the top. Then we will have to manufacture another war.
Fast Gunn is offline   Quote
Old 08-31-2012, 11:42 PM   #36
wellendowed1911
Account Disabled
 
wellendowed1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 12, 2010
Location: allen, texas
Posts: 6,044
Encounters: 85
Default

wellendowed1911 is offline   Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 12:06 AM   #37
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Gunn View Post
I have to disagree with you on this point. America is not a business, but I do agree with you about Romney's limitations.

American is a country.

Business has only one measure of success and that is making money. Business tends to be ruthless and cut-throat, but a country needs compassion.

A successful country needs to operate on a larger vision than a business.

. . . A successful country needs to foster an environment where business can prosper, but it goes beyond that. It must nourish its people, make them proud to be citizens and help them to be productive and return the favor. That is the cycle that keeps a country growing.

CANDYASSCOUNTRY....FUCK YOU
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 12:24 AM   #38
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Timpage, I didn't know you were that dense. Romney won't save the country. We will save the country when the government is taken off our backs and THAT is what Romney will do. This country is not made great by government it is made great by individuals.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 12:33 AM   #39
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Here is a question for wellendowed. You say that governor Romney had the lowest rate of lowering unemployment (which is a negative), tell me what the unemployment rate of Massachusettes was when Romney was governor? For the record unemployment in January of 2003 was 5.6% and it was 4.6% when he left office in January of 2007. The average unemployment rate was 5.7% during Romney's four years. That sound pretty fucking good don't you think WE? You can't tell the truth so you spread damned lies. Go home, fuck your wife, and then stick your head in a toliet until you can tell the truth.



http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LASST25000003
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 11:15 AM   #40
wellendowed1911
Account Disabled
 
wellendowed1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 12, 2010
Location: allen, texas
Posts: 6,044
Encounters: 85
Default

wellendowed1911 is offline   Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 02:51 PM   #41
Submodo
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 4, 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 441
Encounters: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
Here is a question for wellendowed. You say that governor Romney had the lowest rate of lowering unemployment (which is a negative), tell me what the unemployment rate of Massachusettes was when Romney was governor? For the record unemployment in January of 2003 was 5.6% and it was 4.6% when he left office in January of 2007. The average unemployment rate was 5.7% during Romney's four years. That sound pretty fucking good don't you think WE? You can't tell the truth so you spread damned lies. Go home, fuck your wife, and then stick your head in a toliet until you can tell the truth.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LASST25000003
Are those numbers you cite just for Mass?

What were Romney's UE numbers versus the national UE?

As in finance, if you can't beat the general market, you ain't shit.
Submodo is offline   Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 05:32 PM   #42
wellendowed1911
Account Disabled
 
wellendowed1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 12, 2010
Location: allen, texas
Posts: 6,044
Encounters: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Submodo View Post
Are those numbers you cite just for Mass?

What were Romney's UE numbers versus the national UE?

As in finance, if you can't beat the general market, you ain't shit.
Here are some facts when Romney was Gov:


Manufacturing payroll employment throughout the nation declined by nearly 1.1 million or 7% between 2002 and 2006, but in Massachusetts it declined by more than 14%, the third-worst record in the country.
—Andrew Sum and Joseph McLaughlin, Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University
Boston Globe, 7/29/07

Even as his state failed to keep up, Governor Romney slashed funding for the Massachusetts Manufacturing Extension Partnership [MassMEP], a program that “helped hundreds of small manufacturers compete, survive, and save thousands of jobs.”

BOSTON GLOBE, 11/23/2006

In Romney’s first two years, wages fell by 5%—the steepest in the nation. While the median income nationwide was on the rise, it was dropping in Massachusetts.

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS AVERAGE ANNUAL PAY, BLS.GOV

When Mitt Romney took office, unemployment in Massachusetts was below the national average—but economic growth trailed the rest of the country every year he was governor, and job growth failed to keep up with population growth, even as the reverse was true in the rest of the country. When he left office, Massachusetts’ unemployment rate was higher than the national average for the first time since 1995.

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, ANNUAL AVERAGE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE, ACCESSED 9/16/11

ROMNEY:
Mitt Romney claims the unemployment rate in Massachusetts fell during his tenure as governor, and that he created 40,000 jobs in his last year in office.
THE REALITY:
As the nation’s economy grew and the median income rose, under Romney, Massachusetts plummeted from 36th to 47th out of 50 states in job creation, and the median income declined.
wellendowed1911 is offline   Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 05:53 PM   #43
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wellendowed1911 View Post
The implication is, that because the audience is mostly white, the party must be rascist; that's simplistic and wrong. The Republican party welcomes all races. It doesn't discriminate against anyone.

Can you point out how the Republican party is racist, or do you just like to sling mud?

Here's a photo of the crowd at the NAACP convention in Houston. This is the crowd that booed Romney. I don't see many white people. Does that make them racist?

joe bloe is offline   Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 06:24 PM   #44
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joe bloe View Post
The implication is, that because the audience is mostly white, the party must be rascist; that's simplistic and wrong. The Republican party welcomes all races. It doesn't discriminate against anyone.

Can you point out how the Republican party is racist, or do you just like to sling mud?

Here's a photo of the crowd at the NAACP convention in Houston. This is the crowd that booed Romney. I don't see many white people. Does that make them racist?


are you a member of the NAACP?

if not, are you a racist?

what does NAACP mean?

snick
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 06:26 PM   #45
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7 View Post
are you a member of the NAACP?

if not, are you a racist?

what does NAACP mean?

snick
You are beyond stupid.
joe bloe is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved