When You Win It - Here They Come!

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by Green_Mountain

Who were the BLM rioters Tommy?

I need a good laugh for today.

Go poll them and find out. Don't think anyone here including you knows.

You're making some key assumptions.

I think its likely many weren't registered voters, but truthfully don't know

[Green_Mountain]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Go poll them and find out. Don't think anyone here including you knows.

You're making some key assumptions.

I think its likely many weren't registered voters, but truthfully don't know

No. It’s not needed from me to provide.

Tommy said “Again, those weren't Democrats.”

He must have a source, a poll, or some buttoned up logic. I can’t wait to be enlightened soon.

[HDGristle]

Seems needed

[Jacuzzme]

You’re in denial or being deliberately obtuse. When one side wants to send in the guard to quell the riots, and another side encourages them to continue, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what side of the spectrum the rioters are on. There was no poll taken on January 6th, but I’m pretty sure they weren’t Biden supporters.

[HDGristle]

Thought they were mostly goverment plants and Atifa according to some sources on the right.

Sad you can't just admit that you don't know and be a paragon for Chizzy's 1st Law of Wisdom.

I don't know the political affiliation of the rioters. Did you poll them?

[Green_Mountain]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Seems needed

Agree.

Needed to be provided by who said the original statement, Tommy.

[HDGristle]

Your posting style is fairly familiar

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Thought they were mostly goverment plants and Atifa according to some sources on the right.

Sad you can't just admit that you don't know and be a paragon for Chizzy's 1st Law of Wisdom.

I don't know the political affiliation of the rioters. Did you poll them?

Why would I admit to not knowing something that I know? What’s obvious is obvious.

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Why would I admit to not knowing something that I know? What’s obvious is obvious.

That's implicitly admitting you don't know but feel like you know enough to say you know despite not knowing.

Delicious rationalization

[Green_Mountain]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

That's implicitly admitting you don't know but feel like you know enough to say you know despite not knowing.

Delicious rationalization

You’re the guy at work that can’t make the obvious decision.

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

That's implicitly admitting you don't know but feel like you know enough to say you know despite not knowing.

Delicious rationalization

If I walk into a room with a bunch of black guys I don’t need a poll to tell me they’re black.

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

If I walk into a room with a bunch of black guys I don’t need a poll to tell me they’re black.

But you might wanna poll them about their political affiliations

[Devo]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

But you might wanna poll them about their political affiliations

Come on, enough rioters were caught and affiliations are well known, usually mostly non local Liberals.

Even Kyle was attacked by 3 known libs, and at least one convicted person, before he sent them to liberal eav......., err, sorry I forgot there in no Liberal Heaven.

[HDGristle]

Liberal isn't a political affiliation, unless you mean The Liberal Party, or Libertarians It's a polticial ideology.

You do know there are Liberal Conservatives, yes?

As for Kyle... I define him as a "little bitch" but the prosecution didn't make the case. And now he's mostly an irrelevant pariah

[Jacuzzme]

Make the case for what? Defending yourself from an armed mob?

This isn’t even a serious discussion. HD is just trolling.