Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 400
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70822
biomed163693
Yssup Rider61273
gman4453360
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48819
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37415
CryptKicker37231
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2019, 08:17 AM   #31
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

of course it is curious

that the intelligence community worked to help frame trump about Russia

that they leak information they hope would somehow embarrass trump

that the whistleblower rules were 'secretly" changed

almost makes one believe that a plan was in place, poised, awaiting some event that could be spun

and when they thought they hit on something but it was hearsay, the rules were changed to be able to accomplish the plan
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 08:41 AM   #32
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

you guys keep bringing up hearsay, to dodge the fact that Trump's own provided transcript showed the complaints were all TRUE.

your defense is like that of a murder defendant trying to dismiss charges, by saying the indictment spelled his name with a "t" instead of a "d".
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 08:45 AM   #33
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

there is no impeachable offense in the transcript

as listed in the constitution
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 08:48 AM   #34
Chung Tran
BANNED
 
Chung Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2013
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 36,100
Encounters: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought View Post
there is no impeachable offense in the transcript
oh, ok.. I'll take your word for it.
Chung Tran is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 08:53 AM   #35
nevergaveitathought
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 18, 2010
Location: texas (close enough for now)
Posts: 9,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
oh, ok.. I'll take your word for it.
you're more wise than was previously evident
nevergaveitathought is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 09:41 AM   #36
lustylad
Valued Poster
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,787
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
The rules were changed effective August 2019. Which means the change was planned before trump's phone call was a blob of cum in the corner of his mouth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You'd be a liar. Trump's phone call was on 25 July. The rule was changed AFTER the phone call by individuals at the highest level to facilitate the submission of the "complaint", and the "complaint" was written by lawyers that are tied to Soros and hildebeest. The blob of cum is in your eyes and ears.

Uh-oh! What does munchy's WaPo fact-checker have to say say about his post?

Oh dear! It rates the dickmuncher's post as a PANTS-ON-FIRE lie!

Hmmm... does July 25 precede or follow the month of August?

Someone's eyes are so blinded by cum he can't even read a calendar!!
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 10:39 AM   #37
matchingmole
Valued Poster
 
matchingmole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Only minutes from downtown
Posts: 7,183
Encounters: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
The Truth TRUMPS hearsay every time. still waiting for Schiff to present his Russian collusion "evidence" .. i guess he'll make that up as hearsay too.


BAHHAHHAAAAA
There's evidence of collusion with Ukraine now
matchingmole is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 10:57 AM   #38
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matchingmole View Post
There's evidence of collusion with Ukraine now
If there's is so much evidence then why did Adam Schiff have to make up his own version of the phone call transcript. Then when it's obvious he lying he passes it off as a parody. We don't need a parody we need the truth. The truth is this whistle blower story is total bullshit. Nothing about it is factual.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 11:01 AM   #39
matchingmole
Valued Poster
 
matchingmole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Only minutes from downtown
Posts: 7,183
Encounters: 30
Default

If Trump thought he might win the 2020 election...then why pressure Ukraine to get dirt on Biden?
matchingmole is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 11:34 AM   #40
themystic
Valued Poster
 
themystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You'd be a liar. Trump's phone call was on 25 July. The rule was changed AFTER the phone call by individuals at the highest level to facilitate the submission of the "complaint", and the "complaint" was written by lawyers that are tied to Soros and hildebeest. The blob of cum is in your eyes and ears.
fuck a bunch of cum on dress's, whistle blowers and rules. Donald dipshit is going to be impeached for trying to get info from a foreign government about a political rival. that's what time it is you fucking traitot
themystic is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 12:32 PM   #41
Austin Ellen
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 248809
Join Date: Jun 25, 2014
Posts: 5,654
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Oh Oh meltdown is coming. This dumb shit can't even spell.


Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
fuck a bunch of cum on dress's, whistle blowers and rules. Donald dipshit is going to be impeached for trying to get info from a foreign government about a political rival. that's what time it is you fucking traitot
Austin Ellen is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 12:41 PM   #42
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
you guys keep bringing up hearsay, to dodge the fact that Trump's own provided transcript showed the complaints were all TRUE.

your defense is like that of a murder defendant trying to dismiss charges, by saying the indictment spelled his name with a "t" instead of a "d".
No. It's not "all true".

The very premise of the letter is false when the writer claims to be acting "alone" when it's obvious the letter was drafted in lawyer legalese -- and the known lawyers involved are associated with hildebeest and Soros.

Further, the writer falsely subscribes to "know" Trump's "intent" for his every action and impugns his actions are illegal.

But Trump's actions are NOT illegal but rather those prescribed to him by the Constitution as chief executive officer of this great country.

It is the writer and his associates who committed the illegal acts.





Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
fuck a bunch of cum on dress's, whistle blowers and rules. Donald dipshit is going to be impeached for trying to get info from a foreign government about a political rival. that's what time it is you fucking traitot
You're sucking on a big one, Moscow Mystic. This is going to take down several senior dim-retards, starting with Biden, Schiffty and Nadler.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 12:42 PM   #43
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought View Post
there is no impeachable offense in the transcript

as listed in the constitution
The transcript opened the door to impeachment....try and keep up and filter out the nonsense.

Do you or do you not think DJT will be impeached?

WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 12:45 PM   #44
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
No. It's not "all true".

The very premise of the letter is false when the writer claims to be acting "alone" when it's obvious the letter was drafted in lawyer legalese -- and the known lawyers involved are associated with hildebeest and Soros.

Further, the writer falsely subscribes to "know" Trump's "intent" for his every action and impugns his actions are illegal.

But Trump's actions are NOT illegal but rather those prescribed to him by the Constitution as chief executive officer of this great country.

It is the writer and his associates who committed the illegal acts.



.
Is that the FDR defense?

WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 12:53 PM   #45
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Is that the FDR defense?
An intelligent person could discern that FDR was never mentioned.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved