USA Today declares Trump unfit to be President.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Prolongus

http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement...es_trump_unfit

Google the title...lots of articles.
Has there ever been this number of politicians (his own party, lol), publications, news sources, etc. that have ever condemned a candidate as much as Trumpolini has? Nope.

"He is erratic."

"He is ill-equipped to be commander in chief."

"He traffics in prejudice."

"His business career is checkered."

"He isn’t leveling with the American people."

"He speaks recklessly."

"He has coarsened the national dialogue."

"He’s a serial liar."

The editors are in good company. No major daily newspaper has endorsed Donald Trump, and many conservative papers who boast having never, or almost never, endorsed a Democrat – some in more than a century – have been endorsing Hillary Clinton. Among them, The Arizona Republic, The Cincinnati Enquirer, The Dallas Morning News, the Houston Chronicle, and others.

Say what you want about Hillary or Johnson being unfit, clueless, evil, etc. you don't see this kind of condemnation Trumpolini gets.

Lots of people hate Hillary, BTW.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

FTFY, Ekim ,I am the Inbred Chimp.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

FTFYour "anti-semantic" ass, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

FTFY my "anti-semantic" ass, Ekim, I am the Inbred Chimp.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You'd be the most "anti-semantic" queer in the forum, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[Prolongus]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You'd be the embecile that posted the factually unsubstantiated superlative, pro-plunged-ass. Lincoln was a seriously derided candidate, and the consequenses of his election were seriously more contentious than this election ever will be, pro-plunged-ass; hence, your superlative is refuted.

Just a reminder, pro-plunged-ass, the last Clinton in the White House -- Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator -- misplaced the nuclear biscuit for several weeks and didn't give enough of a fuck to tell anyone that it was missing.

You have become a racially bigoted, misogynistic, lying sack of orangutan shit, IB Lemming. It is because you are in bed with Trumpolini, a racially bigoted, misogynistic lying sack of orangutan shit, IB SuckinDick. You are who you support...congrats.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Prolongus

You have become a racially bigoted, misogynistic, lying sack of orangutan shit, IB Lemming. It is because you are in bed with Trumpolini, a racially bigoted, misogynistic lying sack of orangutan shit, IB SuckinDick. You are who you support...congrats.

Your superlative was still factually incorrect, pro-plunged-ass, and Johnson will still be in the toilet mentally incapacitated and crawling on his hands and knees when the election returns announces someone else won.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I would be the most "anti-semantic" queer in the forum, Ekim .

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

FTFY, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by Prolongus

"He isn’t leveling with the American people."
"He’s a serial liar."
.

the shock, as if theres anything still remaining the left does thats shocking, is the twisted "attack them first with the big lie technique" machiavelian incongruity of calling the Donald a liar by the hellary campaign minions including its media

i mean, come on, the worlds ugliest serial inveterate self serving bitch of a liar calling someone else a liar?

Originally Posted by Prolongus

""He has coarsened the national dialogue."
.

is this about political correctness?

so hellary speaks her truth within some secret sanctuary heard only by her sycophantic suck-up's ?

and wears a different face for the public?

give me the Donald please

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

history shows us that Lincoln turned out to be the right man for the job at hand

some would disagree with that.

I don't think he was considering the abuses he did during the war.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

some would disagree with that.

I don't think he was considering the abuses he did during the war.

He did some atrocious things in regards to civil rights abuses, but ultimately, he held this country together. A world without a 'United' States to intervene in WWI and/or WWII would be substantially different, and probably not a difference for the better.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

He did some atrocious things in regards to civil rights abuses, but ultimately, he held this country together. A world without a 'United' States to intervene in WWI and/or WWII would be substantially different, and probably not a difference for the better.

WWI would be debatable. If U.S. had not got involved, there likely some sort of treaty(ies) by all parties involved, WWII most likely would have been avoided. I think the European common market (and maybe the EU) might come into existence earlier, rather than later.

But with the influence of WWI as a major factor, no question on WWII.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

WWI would be debatable, but WWII no question on that.

Imperial Germany might have won WWI without U.S. intervention on the side of the allies.

Its worth noting how there was a qualitative difference between Allied and German troop quarters in the trenches built along the Western Front during WWI. The Germans invested in major, permanent structures anticipating that they would have troops remain there after the war ended. The British and French never dreamed that their fighting positions were anything more than temporary; hence, the creature comforts provided in their trench bunkers never approached the level of development enjoyed by the Germans.

Hitler's vison of world domination had its origin in Imperial Germany's dreams of a world empire.

[Yssup Rider]

IBGoebbels is back on das schtumpf fur Drumpf!

Chachachachachachachacha,