Slave G proves once again she lacks discretion. She is all about herself.... Don't make the mistake guys!

[OldYeller]

Originally Posted by Whispers

Welcome to the insanity! Step right up and be the new queen of San Antonio!

Yeah, be the new Queen so that Whispers starts attacking you!

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by OldYeller

Yeah, be the new Queen so that Whispers starts attacking you!

We need one that will stay above the crap... not BE the crap....

This lady is so incredibly free with information meant to be private that she needs to be muzzled.

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by savak

Actually that washed up sack of germa-phobia that you and the other band of hacks defend is the one getting owned.

One of the beautiful things about meeting her was knowing how much she actually gives a shit about this site. How much she actually cares about her reputation, she takes all this shit sooooo seriously. Right now she's shitting herself clean inside out from all the over-saturated amounts of obliteration whispers is handing her. He rightfully pointed out early on how much of a bullshit artist she is over faking some bullshit about a dog outing her more than her own tattoos or her outing her own medical condition, and now he's owning her for using another client's name to clear herself publicly here on the board over an alert issue. As well as outing information from the men's locker room and outing information about a member's sexual tastes..... and soon to be information for screening she provided me of all people.... about not one.... not two but a "few" members of this community....

At a certain point this shit was over and done with, Yeah... a lot sooner than I thought..... but then her band of jack-tards reignited this shit up Yup! Next9 kick started it and it's doubled in views in just a few days! and the decimation of the 44th runner-up to be Whisper's 2013 sugar baby contest is continuing.

That is so unfair of you to bring up.....

Ok... I changed my mind... It was fair...

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Whispers

Welcome to the insanity! Step right up and be the new queen of San Antonio!

Yup.

My advice to that: Keep an eye on the Court Jester.

[OldYeller]

Originally Posted by Whispers

This lady is so incredibly free with information meant to be private that she needs to be muzzled.

She once said something that she thought was public but wasn't. She was banned. Her sentence has been served, but the crap from you continues.

Another gal blamed her vouch for a problem client publicly, and she said that she vouched for another client. Yes, she stated a handle, but another gal had publicly accused her of giving a bad vouch.

These two incidents are no way balanced by the vicious vendetta you have declared against her.

God may love ya, Whispers - but everyone else thinks you're an ASSHOLE!

[SofaKingFun]

Originally Posted by Slave Guinevere

Hypocrites and the things they INDISCREETLY POST WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF OTHERS!
Originally Posted by Slave Guinevere
WHY DID JESSICA ROMAN HAVE TO GO OFF THE ECCIE MAP? WE HAVE STALKERKINGFUN TO THANK FOR THAT:

(WRONNNNNG!!skf)

CK1942 POSTED THIS IN THE ALERT SECTION ON 7-10-2013


http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=785847&highlight=

Default Bad behavior!
I was trying to reach a lady who left the board some weeks ago, and we finally connected today, not quite 24 hours after I made the post above. (see link at bottom) After hearing her out, I recalled this post and went back and read it to her.... and I made the following addendum:

One of the not so good things about the Hobby is when folks (male/female, doesn't matter) feel the action is all too real and take it to heart in the wrong way.

To make my summary short and sweet:

She left since "a well known and influential hobbyist" had

-- fixated on her,
-- tracked way too much of her personal data
-- appeared at her personal residence
-- flat out jammed her several e-mails, including personal ones
-- jammed her cell phone
-- and threatened to use his influence on the board to ruin her with payback

And texted her while we were talking even though yester her vowed he was through...

... and, well anyone here who cannot see the picture needs a personal consultation with me at the next HH on the 17th.

NOW - before someone says to me "what about HIS side of the story" let me remind you that I never take everything unless with a grain of sale.

However, in this instance I do believe her side almost explicitly since the male in question to my personal knowledge has previously done this type of thing back in the ASPD days.

Needless to say, yes, I will get his side of the story and after that, well....

The target of the unwanted attention has posted an alert in the ladies' only area and, I ask that any ladies who see her information to please let me know if they, too, have had bad experiences with this hobbyist since I personally and professionally don't want folks like that to feel welcome at any events I organize.


If anyone wants to see the genesis of this thread,


http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=775388

****************************** *****

--What the drama queen failed to include was ck1942's follow-up reply...snipped for your reading amusement...

CK1942 is the"off campus" event organizer...I forwarded my proofs to rebut the allegations against me to ck1942, (he can confirm this). After reviewing my evidence, I WAS NOT removed from the events invitation list and to this day, I remain active, on said list. (He can confirm this as well).

****************************** **********************

WHY DID AIDEN MAKENNA HAVE TO LEAVE ECCIE FROM 11-19-2011 UNTIL 02-19-2012?

Why don't you tell us?

Aidan Makenna 11-15-2011 (NATIONAL FORUM)

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=326950&highlight=

"Goodbye... I'm Just Saying…"

AIDAN MAKENNA was gone by 11-19-2011….stayed gone until 2-17-2012

---------------reply------------------------

Where does it say ANYWHERE that I was the cause of her departure?

I've already replied to these bullshit allegations (see below)

And that's just what they are, bullshit!!




****************************** **********

WHISPERS…. STALKERKINGFUN…SAVAK…DDSA…

I DO NOT CARE HOW MANY THREATENING PM'S THAT YOU SEND ME… I WILL NOT BE RUN OFF. ARE WE CLEAR?

SAN ANTONIO, DO YOU REMEMBER MY QUESTION 4 MONTHS AGO? WHO IS NEXT?


SLAVE GUINEVERE


P.S.

Flinde, if you get a chance I would love to hear more about TERESA BROWN….

Slave Guinevere

Slave Guinevere, you are summarily, unequivocally, and absolutely full of shit!!

Now we can add LIAR to the ever-growing list of things that you are.

Amongst those are;

Over-the-top, out-of-control, vindictive, spiteful, drama queen, reckless with clients information, careless with said clients information, hypochondriac, ceaseless player of the victim-card, unaccountable, and unwilling to admit your fuck-ups, and last but certainly not least, a BOLD-FACED LIAR!!


I vehemently, emphatically, and categorically deny ever sending you any kind of threatening message in any way, shape, form, or fashion and I challenge you to prove otherwise!!!!

This is an egregious lie, fabricated to deflect from the fact that you have not, and will not, answer to the fact that you are careless with your clients information. Period.

I demand that you retract that lie post haste or prove that I did.

To the rest of your so-called allegations, I have already given my replies here;

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=207

Originally Posted by SofaKingFun

Ahh, oh spinner of tales, you fail to mention that ck1942, while being organizer of the various events, not only approves but also removes unsavory characters from the invitation list.

As you must be trying to overlook is the simple fact that in my reply, I stated that I would forward my proofs to ck1942 for him to look over and see if my invitation privileges deserved to be revoked...

Guess what? I did, and would you believe that to this day, I remain on that active invitation list?

If I were the dickhead that she allegedly painted me out to be, do you honestly believe that I wouldn't be removed from the list, with prejudice?

Of course I would, however I was not and am not.

I was at the last meet~n~greet, night before last. Missed seeing you there, punkin!




Next spin attempt?


Haha! Aiden MacKenna? Yep. She and I are cool. Saw her about, 6 or so months ago. We had dinner. In fact, she even invited me over to her place for the evening afterwards. I had other plans, and declined, but what was your point again?


If you're trying to insinuate that I had anything to do with her multiple board exits, you're sadly mistaken. She left again not too long ago, did you miss that one? What about the two or three times before those you've mentioned? My fault too?

Come on, guin...you're reaching here. I'm just saying...
.

.

Again, Slave Guinevere, I challenge you to prove differently.



***I'll make a deal with you, Slave Guinevere***

Prove that I had anything to do with either of them leaving.

-If you can, I will leave the board.

-If you cannot, you leave the board.

Do we have a deal?


THAT is what is called a Put-Up or Shut-Up.

Now bring it.

I'm willing. The question remaining is; are you?



.


.

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by OldYeller

She once said something that she thought was public but wasn't. She was banned. Her sentence has been served, but the crap from you continues.

Her continuing to share private client information continued...

Another gal blamed her vouch for a problem client publicly, and she said that she vouched for another client. Yes, she stated a handle, but another gal had publicly accused her of giving a bad vouch. Ok.. So in your opinion does one girl accusing another girl of something justify a client's information being brought into it?

These two incidents are no way balanced by the vicious vendetta you have declared against her.

Let's add in to that her discussing the sexual preferences of another member..... the comments of detailed vouches and another lady commenting on how much she keeps..... and then a lady tells me that Slave provided a detailed vouch to her without even knowing she was who she said she was because she had texted her from a number she had not used before..... which led to my testing that theory.....

God may love ya, Whispers - but everyone else thinks you're an ASSHOLE!

Oh well..... I guess it's a good thing that the opinions of people here that have never met me does not matter to me in matters such as these,,,,....

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by SofaKingFun

Slave Guinevere, you are summarily, unequivocally, and absolutely full of shit!!

Now we can add LIAR to the ever-growing list of things that you are.

Amongst those are;

Over-the-top, out-of-control, vindictive, spiteful, drama queen, reckless with clients information, careless with said clients information, hypochondriac, ceaseless player of the victim-card, unaccountable, and unwilling to admit your fuck-ups, and last but certainly not least, a BOLD-FACED LIAR!!


I vehemently, emphatically, and categorically deny ever sending you any kind of threatening message in any way, shape, form, or fashion and I challenge you to prove otherwise!!!!

This is an egregious lie, fabricated to deflect from the fact that you have not, and will not, answer to the fact that you are careless with your clients information. Period.

I demand that you retract that lie post haste or prove that I did.

To the rest of your so-called allegations, I have already given my replies here;

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=207



Again, Slave Guinevere, I challenge you to prove differently.



***I'll make a deal with you, Slave Guinevere***

Prove that I had anything to do with either of them leaving.

-If you can, I will leave the board.

-If you cannot, you leave the board.

Do we have a deal?


THAT is what is called a Put-Up or Shut-Up.

Now bring it.

I'm willing. The question remaining is; are you?

uh oh.... I think we have us a genuine dog fight....

Attachment 316459

Note: Bitch is used in character to the pics displayed. As in the female of the species...

[SofaKingFun]

Originally Posted by OldYeller

She once said something that she thought was public but wasn't. She was banned. Her sentence has been served, but the crap from you continues.

Another gal blamed her vouch for a problem client publicly, and she said that she vouched for another client. Yes, she stated a handle, but another gal had publicly accused her of giving a bad vouch.

These two incidents are no way balanced by the vicious vendetta you have declared against her.

God may love ya, Whispers - but everyone else thinks you're an ASSHOLE!

Thank you, Old Yeller for stating that.

Which has been my contention all along. She absolutely should not have posted that. She could have refuted the claim against her without posting something that was given to her in confidence; his handle.

That's all I was trying to address, which she continues to ignore.

However, this is just another example in the ever-growing list of examples where she goes to defend herself and indiscriminately throws out clients information without regard to those clients. That's all I have been trying to address, yet, she refuses to acknowledge that it's a problem.

All it would take is a simple and sincere, . "
I see what you mean. I was wrong, and I apologize. It won't happen again".

Or,

"I don't feel that I was being indiscreet because..."

and we could have discussed it, and this would have never gotten to this point. It would have been squashed and we would have moved on..


Instead, she ignores it and goes onto hew Twatter account and posts all sorts of bullshit and plays the Victim card, and the saps buy into it.

Not only that, but we have guys coming out of the woodwork defending her for those indiscretions.

They're so busy trying to defend her that they can't understand just how wrong she is...and she absolutely IS wrong for tossing that sort of thing around in public. Can you not see that?

At least be honest with yourself and take a step back and see what kind of shit this could create for someone.

It is not cool for a provider to mention anything about anything a client that was said to them in private and in confidence..

This was a reference request, asked in private and in confidence..

Would you be alright if your handle was brought to light because you asked for a reference-request from some other provider (in confidence)?

(what about if it was some provider that Slave Guinevere didn't like that posted it publicly..and we both know that there are more than a few....still cool with it, now? be honest......lol)

Can you not see how wrong this is?

That's all I was getting at and since she refuses to overlook it, here we are...

.

.

[savak]

Originally Posted by Whispers

uh oh.... I think we have us a genuine dog fight....

[INSERT YELLOW COLORED DOG PICTURE HERE]

Bitch is used in character to the pics displayed. As in the female of the species...

careful now whispers, we're dealing with a woman whose very good at coppin' some bullshit to get funny pictures removed.

[OldYeller]

No, SFK, I don't see how mentioning someone's handle is a security lapse. Hell, we all use handles all the time! This case was started when another provider publicly claimed that she had given a bad vouch to her, when the vouch she actually gave was for another person. Since this was public, she had to reply publicly.

I can't see tar and feathering her over that.

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by SofaKingFun

That's all I was getting at and since she refuses to deal with it, here we are...

11,648 views and 415 posts later.....

Yes... Here we are.....

Several days ago I drafted a PM to Slave Guinevere that suggested how all of this could be laid to rest. It suggested that she do what others have done in the past. Retract her lies, acknowledge her indiscretion, apologize and pledge to be more discreet in the future....

I let a couple of other people read it and critique it.... More people tend to prefer the never ending drama over any possibility of this ending but a few of us were curious to see if she would see the wisdom in simply "owning" this and rebuilding vs living forever in the shadow of her own indiscretions.

I sent the PM and shortly thereafter I'm accused o sending her threatening PMs in a manner that insinuates there have been many. OK. It was tried....

BTW. I BCC'd the PM to a staff member.. Three have seen it now.....

There are no threats..... Just a summary of what both her and I know as the truth and a suggestion on how to end it all...

at least until her next discretion.......

A few of you seem to have thought it should be handled in that manner.....

I am sure I will hear a 100 reasons why it's too late now for her to be willing to do something about it.... After all... that SHOULD have been done as the first post after her ban....

Then again.... as I explained it to her.... a few of her supporters would be disappointed to hear that she had lied.... that she had made a few mistakes..... but like I suggested to her..... most of those wusses would simply make a new excuse for it where she was concerned and still worship her....

At the end of the day gents...... ladies....

Slave Guinevere is the professional that broke trust with clients and disclosed information that she was privy to through her business dealings with them and she is the one that has lied and misled you.

Let her know you will forgive her no matter what. It might be what she needs to hear....

[john_deere]

Originally Posted by a10bomb

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by savak

careful now whispers, we're dealing with a woman whose very good at coppin' some bullshit to get funny pictures removed.

Attachment 316468

Well... In the words of my favorite provider....... "oopsie"

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by OldYeller

No, SFK, I don't see how mentioning someone's handle is a security lapse. Hell, we all use handles all the time! This case was started when another provider publicly claimed that she had given a bad vouch to her, when the vouch she actually gave was for another person. Since this was public, she had to reply publicly.

I can't see tar and feathering her over that.

so if at the same time she is announcing that this guy was seeking a session with someone and that she herself had seen him and vouched for him......

what if the guy has an ATF that hates Slave and would have nothing to do with this guy if she knew he saw her? What if he was playing games with other ladies that he is broke and can't afford them and now it is out there that he's seen slave as well was trying to see the other lady?...

Those are just 2 real world examples....

It was NONE OF ANYONE'S BUSINESS that was posted....

Let me ask you a question.....

If to refute the allegations that she is innocent I were to post revealing information about you or some other guy that posts in her defense that she provided me when I asked for a vouch pretending to be a Provider in a text message..... would I get a pass on it?