Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 406
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
Starscream66 285
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 273
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70869
biomed164180
Yssup Rider61770
gman4453562
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48948
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37769
CryptKicker37281
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2012, 11:59 PM   #376
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Assup's mommy didn't hug him enough when he was a kid.
.

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 12:06 AM   #377
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,770
Encounters: 67
Default

Misquoting me again. I guess we're going to have to report you to the DIPSHIT POLICE. IBCrying.

I think I'll miss you as much as I do The Whineman and Marshall... Which quite frankly isn't at all!
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 12:11 AM   #378
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Frankly, ASSUP IS A DIPSHIT that can't find his dumb-ass at all!
.

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 10:58 AM   #379
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You argued admitting West Virginia was constitutional, moron, but now you are trying to scurry away from that lame-ass POV. It violated Art IV, Sec 3 of the Constitution, so it WASN'T constitutional! Own your failures, you pretentious bitch!
I did argue that and I still do. That fact that the SCt. was not required to reach the constitutional issues in VA vs. WVa does not mean it was unconstitutional, idiot.

BTW, can you cite something from McPherson or Randall where they specifically mention Article IV, Section 3? Not that I would think their opinion would settle anything, but all I have read from you is that they allegedly documented a bunch of fraud in the election that was held. That's not the same as saying that Article IV, Section 3 prevented WVa from seceding from VA and rejoining the Union. That only means the election was not properly carried out, not that it was unconstitutional.
Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 11:20 AM   #380
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,770
Encounters: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
. THIS WORTHLESS COCKSUCKER MISQUOTES YSSUP RIDER IN EVERY SINGLE POST. NO WONDER HE'S DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR!

Nice cartoon, Bob Kane. I suppose you'll next be penning a comic book about a superhero named BUTTMANN!

Dipshit!
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:20 PM   #381
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Assup is bragging about a new comic book character based on Assup, it's called "Buttman".

.

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:22 PM   #382
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post

I did argue that and I still do. That fact that the SCt. was not required to reach the constitutional issues in VA vs. WVa does not mean it was unconstitutional, idiot.

BTW, can you cite something from McPherson or Randall where they specifically mention Article IV, Section 3? Not that I would think their opinion would settle anything, but all I have read from you is that they allegedly documented a bunch of fraud in the election that was held. That's not the same as saying that Article IV, Section 3 prevented WVa from seceding from VA and rejoining the Union. That only means the election was not properly carried out, not that it was unconstitutional.
One more time, for the mental midget ExNYer. Randall's argument is AG Bates' argument expanded, and Randall argues the process violated Art IV, Sec 3 of the Constitution (pp. 452-453, 1964 ed.). McPherson's argument is that the separate state of West Virginia was not established by provisons enumerated in the Constitution, but rather he argues the process violated Art IV, Sec 3 and describes how it was established by illegal elections, fallacious representatives and by force of arms (pp. 298-299). And it remains, the article you cited stated the constitutionality of West Virgina's independent statehood was never pointedy ruled on by the Supreme Court. A criminal act not prosecuted does not negate nor "disappear" the criminal act. All of this was stated before, you pretentious and ignorant prick.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:44 PM   #383
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,770
Encounters: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Misquoting me again. I guess we're going to have to report you to the DIPSHIT POLICE. IBCrying.

I think I'll miss you as much as I do The Whineman and Marshall... Which quite frankly isn't at all!
WHO'S READY TO FREE UP SPACE ON THEIR ECCIE PAGE?

LET'S JUST GO AHEAD AND PUT THIS ASSHOLE ON IGNORE!
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:47 PM   #384
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
One more time, for the mental midget ExNYer. Randall's argument is AG Bates' argument expanded, and Randall argues the process violated Art IV, Sec 3 of the Constitution (pp. 452-453, 1964 ed.). McPherson's argument is that the separate state of West Virginia was not established by provisons enumerated in the Constitution, but rather he argues the process violated Art IV, Sec 3 and describes how it was established by illegal elections, fallacious representatives and by force of arms (pp. 298-299). And it remains, the article you cited stated the constitutionality of West Virgina's independent statehood was never pointedy ruled on by the Supreme Court. A criminal act not prosecuted does not negate nor "disappear" the criminal act. All of this was stated before, you pretentious and ignorant prick.
Dipshit: Stop referencing "criminal act". This doesn't involve crime and there is no "prosecution".

It is a legal dispute between states about the procedure by which WVa re-entered the Union. And it was tried before the SCt., which ruled in WVa's favor because the VA legislature was bound by the decisions of the governor in the handling of the election. So they were stuck with the governors decisions and could not attempt to plead fraud. That's the reason they never had to make a decision on constitutionality.

And the cites in Randall and McPherson are no more that 2 pages in length. I've never heard of a constitutional analysis that is only 2 pages long. I'd like to see exactly what they said, since I don't trust you for shit.You are the Queen of Cut-and-Paste. How come you can't cut-and-past those two pages?
Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 04:00 PM   #385
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
ASSUP SAYS LET'S JUST GO AHEAD AND PUT ASSUP THE ASSHOLE ON IGNORE!
.

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 04:05 PM   #386
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post
Dipshit: Stop referencing "criminal act". This doesn't involve crime and there is no "prosecution".
Voter suppression by armed men!?! Illegal voting!?! Perjury before Congress!?! Since when were such acts not illegal, you pretentious dipshit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post
It is a legal dispute between states about the procedure by which WVa re-entered the Union. And it was tried before the SCt., which ruled in WVa's favor because the VA legislature was bound by the decisions of the governor in the handling of the election. So they were stuck with the governors decisions and could not attempt to plead fraud. That's the reason they never had to make a decision on constitutionality.

And the cites in Randall and McPherson are no more that 2 pages in length. I've never heard of a constitutional analysis that is only 2 pages long. I'd like to see exactly what they said, since I don't trust you for shit.You are the Queen of Cut-and-Paste. How come you can't cut-and-past those two pages?
The pages cited marked where the authors made their concluding arguments. You'll need to buy the books or go to the library, you cheap pretentious bastard!
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 04:48 PM   #387
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Voter suppression by armed men!?! Illegal voting!?! Perjury before Congress!?! Since when were such acts not illegal, you pretentious dipshit?
Your ignorance is overwhelming. The case was tried before the SCt, which had original jurisdiction. It was not a criminal case. The SCt settles disputes between states.

To put it differently, in the case of VA vs. WVa, who do you think would have gone to jail? West Virginia?



Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 04:52 PM   #388
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The pages cited marked where the authors made their concluding arguments. You'll need to buy the books or go to the library, you cheap pretentious bastard!
So, in other words, you never fucking read it. You just cut-and-pasted it from somewhere else.

But that's all right. If you say those two pages are where their conclusions are, I'll read the conclusions. Cut-and-paste, great Queen.
Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 05:19 PM   #389
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post
[SIZE=3]Your ignorance is overwhelming. The case was tried before the SCt, which had original jurisdiction. It was not a criminal case. The SCt settles disputes between states.

To put it differently, in the case of VA vs. WVa, who do you think would have gone to jail? West Virginia?
Persist in your willful and ignorant blindness, you pretentious jackass. The unconstitutional process was filled with illegal acts.

So, in other words, you never fucking read it. You just cut-and-pasted it from somewhere else.

But that's all right. If you say those two pages are where their conclusions are, I'll read the conclusions. Cut-and-paste, great Queen.
Once again you are wrong, you pretentious jackass. Read McPherson's book years ago. McPherson's book is considered the one-volume touchstone on this period of history, and it is still subject to copyright laws. Randall's book arrived in the mail Saturday -- and read the pertinent chapter on-line as cited above. Whereas, your lame ass never progressed beyond citing a wiki article that refuted your lame-ass POV, you pretentious jackass. You'll need to buy the books or go to the library, you cheap, pretentious bastard!

Persist in your willful and ignorant blindness, you pretentious jackass. The unconstitutional process was filled with illegal acts.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 06:01 PM   #390
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,770
Encounters: 67
Default

Just ignore the cretin...

He'll post thread after thread by himself in the dark.

then I suppose he'll call himself pretentious.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved