symbols are not facts

[Guest062813-1]

Originally Posted by JCM800

isn't the "donation" for time spent only?

Of course it is. However, say a review went something like this:

Description: I put the money down on the table played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw....then she proceeded to give me the best bj of my life her hott, tight mouth all over my cock dripping wet. I flipped that bitch over shoved my cock into her tight pussy and BOOM I exploded in pure extasy.

Best 20 dollars I ever spent!

Anyone else see the problem......

Not to mention that site had very minimal security....

[Guest062813-1]

Originally Posted by Gemma34

OMG! Hell yea, lol, I had so many reviews on there too. That was the first site I was on. But, I agree, not everybody is smart and that makes it worse for us professional & legit ladies and gents.

Agreed! Don't mess the game up! One dumbass can change everything. Couldn't have said it better myself. Gemma you seem like an intelligent lady. <3

[JCM800]

Originally Posted by Miss Cherry

Description: I put the money down on the table played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw....then she proceeded to give me the best bj of my life her hott, tight mouth all over my cock dripping wet. I flipped that bitch over shoved my cock into her tight pussy and BOOM I exploded in pure extasy.

nice review.... did she allow CIM?

[Wizard of Ahhhhs]

Originally Posted by Miss Cherry

...played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw...

Glad to see you included DATY activity in your scenario! Smart girl!

[luvlittlemilkers]

I wish all the reviews were written like this...it would save me a lot of money.

Originally Posted by Miss Cherry

Of course it is. However, say a review went something like this:

Description: I put the money down on the table played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw....then she proceeded to give me the best bj of my life her hott, tight mouth all over my cock dripping wet. I flipped that bitch over shoved my cock into her tight pussy and BOOM I exploded in pure extasy.

Best 20 dollars I ever spent!

Anyone else see the problem......

Not to mention that site had very minimal security....

[KCQuestor]

It is commonly accepted that $ means "US$100" ("one hundred dollars in US currency") and $$ means "US$200" and $$.50 means "US$250." It is commonly accepted that BBBJ means 'bareback blowjob" ("oral sex without a condom") and CIM means "cum in mouth" (or "ejaculation into the mouth"). These statements could easily be shown to be true in a court of law.

Therefore, saying "I paid her $$ for BBBJ and CIM" is no different from saying "I paid her two hundred dollars for a blowjob without a condom and I ejaculated into her mouth." The codes do NOTHING to protect clients or providers. The codes are either convenient (in the case of "BBBJ" and "CIM") or ridiculous (in the case of "$.5").

The stuff about "dreams"? Bullshit.
The stuff about "roses", "diamonds", "kisses"? Bullshit.
The stuff about "time spent for companionship only"? Bullshit.

If you paid a woman for sex, all the euphemisms in the world won't protect you from prosecution if they want to get you.

The only money codes that don't bother me much (as if anyone cares what bothers me) are "$$" and "$$$" as both of those are unambiguous and shorter than saying $200 or $300. Everything else is not worth doing.

[blade78]

Originally Posted by KCQuestor

It
The only money codes that don't bother me much (as if anyone cares what bothers me) are "$$" and "$$$" as both of those are unambiguous and shorter than saying $200 or $300. Everything else is not worth doing.

Finally, I caught on and urban dictionary helped out
I am not a fan of text talk, likely since I am in school and read quite a bit. Reading is a process that I learned by memorizing words when I was little, not sounding them out. So I read by scanning.
This means I'm not used to the "text-talk". It's used my most people these days, and it trips up my scanning since I pretty much have to look at letters and then stop and think what they have said.
Not a light of time, but definite bumps in my reading, which used to bug me. But I'm getting used to people doing that, as I'm used to see so many fat people eating large quantities of food then blaming genetics for their CVD or diabetes.

[KCQuestor]

Originally Posted by blade78

But I'm getting used to people doing that, as I'm used to see so many fat people eating large quantities of food then blaming genetics for their CVD or diabetes.

Where did THAT come from?

[dirty dog]

Originally Posted by KCQuestor

Where did THAT come from?

KC I think the poster is Rex Reed

[i'va biggen]

@#%$#$^%&%^%$# What did I say?

[Guest013121]

Originally Posted by Aceysexyazz

Of course it is. However, say a review went something like this:

Description: I put the money down on the table played with her tight pussy which tasted delicious btw....then she proceeded to give me the best bj of my life her hott, tight mouth all over my cock dripping wet. I flipped that bitch over shoved my cock into her tight pussy and BOOM I exploded in pure extasy.

Best 20 dollars I ever spent!

Anyone else see the problem......

Not to mention that site had very minimal security....

HILARIOUS! I don't care who you are, this shit is funny as hell! You are hilarious girl, yet you make a very good point.