WHY WOULD THIS DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVE STEAL THESE RECORDS ???

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Nope but if a democrat is speaking you can bet they are lying about something.
Best to keep your hand on your wallet and your money clip too.

With either you are lucky to have anything in your money clip.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

Guess DUMB ASS rang one AH Don't bump old threads you got my last word on that one live with it.Retard

Ekim the Inbred, you are the 'retard'. It must be your lack of genetic material from the brother-sister thing your family and you perpetuates. And you obviously haven't figured out that your last word doesn't mean shit; especially since your 'last word' was completely ridiculed and dismissed by your one and only authoritative cite: Rothschild.
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount= 81 __________________

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Ekim the Inbred, you are the 'retard'. It must be your lack of genetic material from the brother-sister thing your family and you perpetuates __________________

My god I B the pompous are you going to plagiarise every thing I have said to you.Surly in you bloated ego you can come up with a original thought.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

My god I B the pompous are you going to plagiarise every thing I have said to you.Surly in you bloated ego you can come up with a original thought.

Ekim the Inbred, you are lying again.

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=77
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=79
. . . .

BTW, Ekim the Inbred, one cannot 'plagiarise' you since 'plagiarise' isn't a word. . . . .

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Ekim the Inbred, you are lying again.

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=77
http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...7&postcount=79
. . . .

BTW, Ekim the Inbred, one cannot 'plagiarise' you since 'plagiarise' isn't a word. . . . .

Whine and cry all you want I B the pompous you have nothing new except your inability to grasp what others say.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

Whine and cry all you want I B the pompous you have nothing new except your inability to grasp what others say.

Funny coming from you Ekim the Inbred, considering you didn't 'grasp' what Rothschild was saying when you used him to support your POV.

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount= 81

[i'va biggen]

[quote=I B Hankering;2461301]Funny coming from you Ekim the Inbred, considering you didn't 'grasp' what Rothschild was saying when you used him to support your POV.



Ok I B the pompous Plagiarise means to steal someone else s work it is a word look it up. Used in a sentence like "why do students plagiarise"
In recent years pre columbian skeletons such as unearthed at the Hull friary in england have been found with distinctive signs of syphilis.And if you bitch about a thread fuck you look it up I did.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

Ok I B the pompous Plagiarise means to steal someone else s work it is a word look it up. Used in a sentence like "why do students plagiarise"
In recent years pre columbian skeletons such as unearthed at the Hull friary in england have been found with distinctive signs of syphilis.And if you bitch about a thread fuck you look it up I did.

'Plagiarise' isn't a word. So fuck you. The skeletons at Hull Friary have not met and passed the test of scientific scrutiny.

‘the big problem with the Hull site is the dating so none of the individuals studied (including skeleton 1216) can be reliably dated to before 1495. Until the Hull researchers can demonstrate that their dating is solid, I think their claim to syphilitic fame is suspect.’”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...m-America.html


So fuck you.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

'Plagiarise' isn't a word. So fuck you. The skeletons at Hull Friary have not met and passed the test of scientific scrutiny.

‘the big problem with the Hull site is the dating so none of the individuals studied (including skeleton 1216) can be reliably dated to before 1495. Until the Hull researchers can demonstrate that their dating is solid, I think their claim to syphilitic fame is suspect.’”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...m-America.html


So fuck you.

Facts really fuck you up,don;t they I B the pompous

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

Facts really fuck you up,don;t they I B the pompous

Then why is it every time you try to employ a fact, it bites you in the ass, Ekim the Inbred.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Then why is it every time you try to employ a fact, it bites you in the ass, Ekim the Inbred.

If you ever came up with a fact it would be the 8th wonder of the world.I B the pompous

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

If you ever came up with a fact it would be the 8th wonder of the world.I B the pompous

Fact: you cited Rothschild to support your POV. Fact: Rothschild shot your POV to hell and back. Fact: you are an ignorant fuck that posts bullshit hoping others don't call your bluff, Ekim the Inbred.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Fact: you cited Rothschild to support your POV. Fact: Rothschild shot your POV to hell and back. Fact: you are an ignorant fuck that posts bullshit hoping others don't call your bluff, Ekim the Inbred.

Excuse me fool you are the one trumpeting Rothschild and his findings,he is the one disputing all findings showing the old country had syphilis prior,he doesn't want people to know his ancestors fucked sheep.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

Excuse me fool you are the one trumpeting Rothschild and his findings,he is the one disputing all findings showing the old country had syphilis prior,he doesn't want people to know his ancestors fucked sheep.

Ekimthe Inbred, it was your stupid ass that cited Rothschild to support your POV:

Originally Posted by ekim008

The things you mention are a theory same as the french having spanish mercs with them at the battle is a theory they were carrying the disease.you also didn't read Rothschild's report he never found a skeleton dating back more than 600 years in north America .They have given him skeletons from the old country dating back 2000 years showing the disease,but he discredits them.I think he is in denial like you are,and where it came from .

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...2&postcount=76

History of Syphilis

Bruce M. Rothschild

Origin of Syphilis

It is clear that syphilis was present in the New World at the time of Columbus' arrival [19, 49]. Especially pertinent is documentation of syphilis in the area where he actually landed, the Dominican Republic [95]. The periosteal reaction characteristic of syphilis has been recognized in 6%–14% of skeletons from the El Soco (800 a.d.), Juan Dolio (1400 a.d.), La Caleta (1200–1300 a.d.), Atajadizo (1200–1300 a.d.), and Cueva Cabrera (1200–1300 a.d.) sites. The average number of bone groups affected ranged from 1.7 to 2.6. Sabre shin remodeling was often so marked as to erase all surface indications of periosteal reaction. The osseous evidence documents the presence of syphilis in the Dominican Republic where Columbus landed. Columbus' crew clearly had the opportunity and means to contract and spread the venereal disease we now call syphilis.

http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/40/10/1454.full

[Guest123018-4]

Back to the topic.
that is the job of most democrats.